Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Apparently [latex]xe^{-x^2}[/latex] is an odd function. I found out the long way finding the integral sums to zero (btw, excluding trivial cases, is that a sufficient condition to conclude a function must be odd?). However, i am supposed to be able to tell this was odd by inspection (similarly for even functions).

 

I'm sure they don't mean i need to be able to determine the parity of any function by inspection, but does anyone know of any hints and tricks for doing so? I'm starting to see a pattern where the parity of a Gaussian integral multiplied by a polynomial is equal to the parity of the polynomial. Any others?

Posted

I would break it down and grok what bits do what for different portions of the number line; ie big negative, fractional negative, zero, fraction, big positive

 

x^2 is always positive,

so -x^2 is always negative

so e^(-x^2) is symmetrical about y axis

the multiplication by x means that the expression will change in magnitude by the same amount on each side of the y axis BUT that the sign will be flipped for negative x. ie f(-x) will equal -f(x)

Posted (edited)

 

 

I found out the long way finding the integral sums to zero (btw, excluding trivial cases, is that a sufficient condition to conclude a function must be odd?).

 

No.

 

The definition of an odd function is

 

f(x) = -f(-x)

 

The definition of an even function is

 

f(x) = f(-x)

 

That makes the zero function even, but the integral of the zero function over any interval is zero.

 

There is no such thing as a trivial case in proofs.

Edited by studiot
Posted

 

 

Nope where x = root(y) =( -y^1/2)^2 = -y^(2/2) = -y

 

 

That doesn't appear to have anything to do with the question. If x = -y then x2 = y2 therefore -x2 is negative.

 

x2 is always negative (unless x is complex).

Posted

I would break it down and grok what bits do what for different portions of the number line; ie big negative, fractional negative, zero, fraction, big positive

 

x^2 is always positive,

so -x^2 is always negative

so e^(-x^2) is symmetrical about y axis

the multiplication by x means that the expression will change in magnitude by the same amount on each side of the y axis BUT that the sign will be flipped for negative x. ie f(-x) will equal -f(x)

I think you've mixed up a bit; "always positive" and "always negative" are irrelevant here. For example, e^x is always positive, but isn't even. What's relevant is:

 

x^2 is even (symmetrical about y-axis)

so -x^2 is even

so e^(-x^2) is even

 

x is odd

so x e^(-x^2) is odd.

Posted

I am not quite sure what's going on here - perhaps some are conflating the notion of odd/even numbers with that of odd/even functions.

 

Here's a (sort of) definition: A function is even if, for every element in its domain, its sign id preserved in the codomain (sometimes called the "range")

 

Example: if [math]f(x) = 2x[/math] for all Real [math]x[/math], then obviously [math]f(x)+f(-x)=0[/math]

 

Conversely, a function is odd if,for every element in the domain it reverses the sign in the codomain.

 

Example: if [math]f(x)=x^2[/math] for all Real [math]x[/math], then obviously [math]f(x)+(-(f(-x))=f(x)-f(-x)=0[/math].

 

What's hard about that?

Posted (edited)

 

xerxes

A function is even if, for every element in its domain, its sign id preserved in the codomain (sometimes called the "range")

 

You might like to consider if you have this the wrong way round.

 

Consider f(x) = x3.

 

If x = -3 then f(x) = -27 so the sign is preserved.

 

Is x3 odd or even?

Edited by studiot
Posted

Is x3 odd or even?

I don't understand the question. [math]x^3[/math] is a number, and is odd or even according to whether [math]x[/math] is odd or even.

 

the function [math]f: \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R}, x \mapsto x^n[/math] is even or odd according to whether [math]n[/math] is odd or even,

Posted (edited)

I don't understand the question. [math]x^3[/math] is a number, and is odd or even according to whether [math]x[/math] is odd or even.

 

the function [math]f: \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R}, x \mapsto x^n[/math] is even or odd according to whether [math]n[/math] is odd or even,

 

The question refers to the quote taken from your previous post and highlighted in my post # 8

 

In your terminology, x is not a number it is an element of the domain and x3 is not another number, it is an element of the codomain.

 

You are the one who chose to introduce this method of describing a function.

 

The point I am making is that the sign of the element (-3 in this case) in the domain is the same as the sign of the element in the codomain (-27 in this case), which was your specified definition of an even function in your post#7.

 

This contradicts your statement in your post#9 which states that if n = 3, and therefore odd, the function is odd, since 3 is odd.

 

As a matter of interest the range and the codomain do not necessarily coincide for a function.

Edited by studiot
Posted

This contradicts your statement in your post#9 which states that if n = 3, and therefore odd, the function is odd, since 3 is odd.

I said no such thing. Read again, paying particular attention to word ordering
Posted (edited)

I said no such thing. Read again, paying particular attention to word ordering

 

Yes indeed I missed the order reversal so your two posts are consistent.

 

Sadly they are consistently wrong.

 

post-74263-0-09701300-1478986750_thumb.jpg

 

post-74263-0-95419300-1478986870_thumb.jpg

 

 

 

 

Edited by studiot
Posted

You say "Apparently b5494fba9f52e1afcbe59c94d5a88763-1.png is an odd function. I found out the long way finding the integral sums to zero"
That's interesting.

If I wanted to find if it was odd or even I'd split it into two parts.
x and e^-x2
y=x is clearly an odd function.

and y= e^-x2 is a well known function- give or take a scaling factor- it's the normal distribution and it's symmetrical so it's even

 

Here's the important bit- the product of an even function and an odd function is always odd

and that answers the question for you.

 

But I'm more interested in the integration you did.

There is no analytic form for the integral of the normal distribution- that's why there are lots of table for it, but you have integrated a very similar function and I'd like to know how.

Posted (edited)

You say "Apparently b5494fba9f52e1afcbe59c94d5a88763-1.png is an odd function. I found out the long way finding the integral sums to zero"

That's interesting.

If I wanted to find if it was odd or even I'd split it into two parts.

x and e^-x2

y=x is clearly an odd function.

and y= e^-x2 is a well known function- give or take a scaling factor- it's the normal distribution and it's symmetrical so it's even

 

Here's the important bit- the product of an even function and an odd function is always odd

and that answers the question for you.

 

But I'm more interested in the integration you did.

There is no analytic form for the integral of the normal distribution- that's why there are lots of table for it, but you have integrated a very similar function and I'd like to know how.

 

 

I haven't worked it fully through, but does not the substitution

 

z = x2

 

dz = 2xdx

 

[math]I = \frac{1}{2}\int {{e^{ - z}}} dz[/math]
Not suffice?
Edited by studiot
Posted

Thanks for all the tips, i find just being aware helps a great deal.

 

 

.

.

.

That makes the zero function even, but the integral of the zero function over any interval is zero.

 

There is no such thing as a trivial case in proofs.

 

I thought i was using the term correctly, for instance this wikipedia page refers to the zero function as trivial. Does it depend on context?

 

 

But I'm more interested in the integration you did.

There is no analytic form for the integral of the normal distribution- that's why there are lots of table for it, but you have integrated a very similar function and I'd like to know how.

 

Its not quite a normal distribution though (integrated over the entire set of reals, which is what i did, its the expectation of a normal), its multiplied by x which allows the substitution studiot gave to work.

Posted

Thanks for all the tips, i find just being aware helps a great deal.

 

 

 

I thought i was using the term correctly, for instance this wikipedia page refers to the zero function as trivial. Does it depend on context?

 

 

 

Its not quite a normal distribution though (integrated over the entire set of reals, which is what i did, its the expectation of a normal), its multiplied by x which allows the substitution studiot gave to work.

 

What is trivial does indeed depend upon the context.

 

Remember it only takes one except to disprove the most elegant theory in maths.

 

The zero function is y = 0 for all x.

 

This is not quite the same as for instance y = ax3 which is odd for all a except a = 0, when it is neither odd nor even.

 

It is a subtle point and I wanted to move on from towards noting that in general functions are neither odd nor even, but may be decomposed into the sum of an odd function and an even function.

 

Odd and even have significance in science, in that they are examples of a wider phenomenon known as parity.

Even functions have parity +1 and odd functions have parity -1

 

Parity is related to symmetry,

so an even function is symmetric with respect to the y axis, x = 0

and an odd function is antisymmetric with respect to the x axis, y = 0

Posted

I'm a bit odd ... But would that make me an odd Function?

 

 

A bit odd??

 

But what about the other bit ie the rest of you?

 

So you are really like most functions, the sum of an odd and an even function.

 

:P

Posted (edited)

 

A bit odd??

 

But what about the other bit ie the rest of you?

 

So you are really like most functions, the sum of an odd and an even function.

 

:P

 

Okay, we're even now.

 

 

 

 

 

There's the other bit; the even Function.

 

But if I am like most other functions, would that make almost every Function a bit odd? ;)

Edited by Function
Posted (edited)

 

Okay, we're even now.

 

 

 

 

 

There's the other bit; the even Function.

 

But if I am like most other functions, would that make almost every Function a bit odd? ;)

 

Touche +1

 

:)>:D

Edited by studiot
Posted

But if I am like most other functions, would that make almost every Function a bit odd? ;)

Yes, just like 2 is a very odd prime.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.