Trash Can

Why does SpaceX lie about everything? Here is an example: This is a flat out lie. Falcon Heavy total thrust is 3.4million lbs sealevel. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falcon_Heavy Space Shuttle total thrust was 6.78million lbs sea level. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_Shuttle And the lies don't stop there. Will someone please tell me why SpaceX lies? SpaceX's biggest rocket is almost 1/3rd the thrust needed to match SaturnV. SaturnV came it at a whopping 9.2million lbs total thrust. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saturn_V SpaceX isn't close to getting anyone to the moon.

Seems to be an overlooked problem. Rockets are meant to operate in "0G". Sort of. There are solutions to this problem not present in your design. The only thing keeping everything downstream in your design is gravity itself.

So what happens when you have to build an actual ramp and it doesn't look flat at all? The ability to abstract is the point of all education. Generalization is the goal of mathematics. Some things are more easily understood if not abstracted or generalized but then how are you any better than a sheep herder counting stones to keep track of all his sheep? A sheep herder would never make it to the Moon. Remember. Egyptian mathematics was binary based and ingeniously simple for mental calculations. Look what they accomplished with it. Absolutely nothing. The pyramids got us as close to powering a light bulb as it did to getting us to the …

I think a saucer has as much relationship to anything as my idea of blowing smoke rings will make a toroidal plasma magnetic bottle work. I.E. not at all related. Just because something looks related (a smoke ring looks like a toroid) doesn't mean it'll make a more efficient torus. The work in a fusion reactor (mathematically) happens mostly in a small part of a torus and looks like a banana. Does that mean I should throw bananas into my reactor to improve its yield? I personally don't think wormholes are at all practical and is stupid waste of braincells. "Throw your self into a blender. Because your blended self contains all the s…

If I had a choice of flying on an airplane in turbulence with screaming babies or a crackling tesla coil that moves like a wobbly hoverboard....I'd choose the f-ing jet engine. OK? Technology is people dependent. I don't want to sail a submarine on hydrogen peroxide either. Sure it's fantastically better physics. But it explodes easily. Which is why the Russians called such submarines cigarette lighters and the UK sailors literally named theirs "the Exploder". Neither Navies continued the effort because people wouldn't put up with them. So your ionocraft is a waste of time. No one wants to fly to see Grandma in a Faraday c…

Many of your points are valid. However, many are standard Royal Society armchair recitals of current beliefs which are the same as ancient beliefs. I noted that you did not mention Benjamin Franklin, the other side of the coin, the man who started science on earth. A man whose inventions were better in many ways than even Tesla's inventions due to a basic understanding of the universe. The Royal society laughed at old Benjamin Franklin for thirty minutes, as his letter about static electricity and lightning being the same was read by a friend who knew of Benjamin Franklin's working lightning rods. They claimed he was spouting off. They challenged him to fly a kite i…

Magnetically levitated bearings would be excellent in space where lubricants in a vacuum tend not to work because they evaporate as if they were extremely hot. Metal-to-metal interaction can create abnormal heat and wear because there are very few air molecules between the metal parts, not as there would be on earth. Even substances like Teflon may malfunction in space where friction is involved. The only problem I see is that magnetic fields can interfere with insulation materials, nullifying their ability to contain electrical charges completely. If electrical contacts near the magnetic field are insulated and covered in metal and bonded to the ship, it should not cause…

Yes there are Genes in the human Genome which influence human sexual orientation. And yes hormones(Neurosteroids) change the epigenetic mechanism of the brain and body. I am extremly suffering under my sexual orientation. My face is the living truth, that sexual orientation has a biolocal explanation. And btw I habe exome sequenced(80x) my Genome. I also have full genome sequenced my genome(50x). And 3 times genotyped by 23andme. There is 100% certain that biological there is some flawed in my case. Sexual orientation is neurobiological, genetic and or epigenetic organized.

I cannot convince myself that Democrats are/will be doing much better than the former republican one . Democrats & Republicans both are either directly or indirectly almost always playing into the hands of corporate America + Wall Street. During the process of electing Obama , especially the 2nd term , much interest and enthusiasm was aroused for doing something in favor of a semi-radical reform to return America back to some simulacrum of normalcy : especially over the issue of abject poverty // but also over the slavery that is called a lifetime job or a long-life job. Then you see what Obama did to all those crowds of truly willing young people ? He simply told …

Biden and the Corporatists don't really want the 15 mw. Their actions are a charade.

Following Occam's razor, the Wuhan lab leak hypothesis is the most logical explanation for the origin of Covid 19 at this point. More and more scientists are going on record in support of this hypothesis. There was a great piece in Politico back in March about it. The WHO will never be truly objective, due to political influence from China, and it seems somewhat of a taboo subject in the scientific community writ large (due in large part to the politicization of the hypothesis and other conflicts of interest). It's entirely logical that a respiratory pathogen with this level of infectiousness might accidentally find its way out into the surrounding area.

I see Quazi_Scientists here have awarded me 2 negatives,,,,,,,, Many Thanks ! seems they (whoever they are/ I don't know) just only wish the scientifically faulty system to be never ever criticized . . . .only to be blarneyed and flattered and cajoled....... People's lives are in real danger ,,,,,,,,, Some groups totally unaware of the biology of the thing are fooled into believing firm in the present defective vaccination system . . . . .. Other than we--truly expert biologists--who is responsible for the deaths and injuries incurred ? Are we not to openly warn non-biologists of the malfunctioning of the whole agenda ? Are we dut…

In fact, gravity an anti-scientific hypothesis, since action at a distance is rejected by true science There is still evidence of the falsity of gravity, it seems this antithesis was put forward by Galileo. If there was gravity, then 2 objects of different gravity, connected between them, would fall more slowly, because a lighter object would slow down a heavier one. Consequently, an increase in mass both accelerates and slows the fall. This is contradiction.

The American nation is rightfully considered the guarantor of human rights and freedoms in the world. Why doesn't US interfere in the affairs of Afghanistan and China, on the genocide of the Hazaras and Uighurs? As far as I know, there is no official US position on these issues, moreover, Turkey is doing this at least under the pretext of protecting Muslims in relation to the Uighurs.

In fact, oxygen is the main destroyer of life. Oxygen leads to aging and cancer in humans, it destroys cells, it leads to decay in the plant kingdom, it is a toxic substance, and a decrease in its concentration in the mountains has a beneficial effect on life expectancy and on athletic performance. In eukaryotes, the native mode of energy consumption is fermentation, not oxidation. Oxidation is only native to bacteria, and humans do not consume oxygen themselves, they feed them to mitochondria, a type of bacteria in cells. By the way, I am not good at chemistry, but I think it would be reasonable to ask whether the effect of oxygen is reduced to the leaching of carb…

I think that oxygen reduction is a positive factor for humans. Oxygen is toxic and destructive and leads to aging and cancer. Mountain air with a low oxygen content is considered healthier, and people live there longer, athletes train there. It is also likely that an excess of the ozone layer leads to a lack of solar energy. Smoking could be an evolutionary maneuver in the fight against excess oxygen. If it weren't for the benefit, natural selection would not have gone down the path when inhaling smoke is enjoyable and satisfying. The qualities that lead to survival evolve.

There is no proof in a subjective measurement. I can give some examples if you like. Is shadow a physical object? Is a hole a physical object? If the physics of the universe, has created an effect that we can notice and define or measure, then it is a physical object. That's all any subjective perspective is capable of. THIS IS AN EDIT. I wanted to reword this. If the physics of the universe, has created an effect that we can notice and define or measure, then it is a physical SUBJECT. Not an object. In all terms of reality, we have no objective proof of anything. Math could be said to be an objective truth, but it only solves the truths that we realize i…

Do you ever expect that I will want to express myself honestly to you ever again? HAHA...cute.

There are numerous ways to "cheat" gravity. We can throw ourselves forward and using our legs to convert the momentum to lifting. Essentially we can use most of our muscles to lift ourselves rather than just those designed for the task. As you get older you find that such tricks are less a luxury and more a necessity. Where you were once able to leap to your feet from a prone position in one single movement you'll find that six or eight movements become needed. They say if you can get up in two or fewer movements you won't die for five years. It's been a long time though since I could do it in two. I don't believe there are "laws of physic…

quote from iNow : " No. It was a singularity such as those predicted at the center of BHs, but was not from a BH itself. " Singularities have little meaning in maths , let alone in truly objective physix. Big bang seems to be very scarcely different from Creationism ....... The two are intrinsically the same .... __________________________________________________________________ quote from Migl : " There is no upper limit on BH size. There is only a limit to how much you can feed them. Once they 'eat' all close by mass via their accretion disc, they can't overcome farther out stable orbiting material, and stop growing. Direct collap…

seeing scarcity of revisionist theories or alternative one, think not just as skepticism room but also for greater viewability SF should introduce adequate subforums in the main one, not that like that will pop up many pseudo scientist but if Particle Physics indeed is in vacuum definetily it wont hurt to have alternative views on the mainstream science if not else as fact-check debunking space ... ... Speculative subforum how is piled with topics from all subforums, simply is not usefull as empirical recheck of the mainstream theories, I mean I am not somehow against them but just say without skepticism for what kind of science we talk jere, elitist or arogant, inst…

Too many conceptualisations? Which ones do you have in mind?

I was watching an episode of ancient aliens and conspiracy theory came up , all sorts of theories but none of them spoke truth . It is my belief that we as humans are directly associated with aliens through genetic manipulation , it is my theory that that is actually where we came from . Oh yes the evolutionary scale is the foundation of our existence but what I believe was left out is just that , we where created by extraterrestrials and now they are coming to earth to check up on their creation . I also believe that religion came some time later in an attempt to through us off the track of the truth , now today there is talk on the show saying the us government is beh…

Is time travel really possible? Does the time exist? What we call time is actually a periodic counting system. When we count from 1 to 60 at certain intervals, we call it 1 minute. Time is something human made up. Time in the universe is zero. So there is no such thing as time in the universe. For this reason, it is not possible for time to go backwards or forwards. The assumptions made, such as time travel or twisting of time, are wrong. Everything happens and ends in the earth and the universe. So the video doesn't rewind or fast forward. While the water in a container boils for 15 minutes, this boiling time decreases to 10 minutes when we increase the heat. T…

… AND HUMAN LIED TO HIMSELF. - HOW DOES THE HUMAN BRAIN WORK ? - WHY DO WE DREAM ? - HOW DID RELIGIONS START ? - MYTHOLOGY: RELIGION AND EVOLUTION HOW DOES THE HUMAN BRAIN WORK ? In humans, the soul is actually consciousness. There is no soul. The organs of consciousness are the eyes, ears, nose, tongue and skin. The brain is like television broadcasting live with these consciousness organs. Consciousness System; Consciousness Organs, Subconscious and Inquiry Section. The Consciousness Organs and the Inquiry Section are connected to the Subconscious. The subconscious has a duty to manage and decide the body. The shape below shows the Consc…