Trash Can

The Theory of Life Before we begin, I must say the key to learning is self reflection, well it's history. What is history? Everything and every moment and every event ever that happened before where and when you are now. The new studies of History and the way we teach it show that we need to stop being biased...for any reason whatsoever, if we truly want to understand history/what people did/our previous illnesses and discoveries and truths and revelations, we must do so while "being in their shoes." We have to study it as not factual information, but how people do what they do, why do it, how do they do it, what led them to do it, what was the result, why does this m…

This frankly sounds like a load of bollocks

Above all, don't deny this idea - that changes in the Earth's climate are caused by man-made carbon emissions. Admittedly, the idea is laughably stupid. But - it's the current fashionable theory. So contesting it will get you nowhere. Except for getting lots of negative rep,

I_m a extended time watcher and I just believed I_d drop by and say hi there there for your very 1st time. I critically take pleasure in your posts. Thank you You are my role models. Thanks for the article thank you for valuable ideas and simply good information i can agree with the post r u sure that is certainly true? Not so poor. Exciting factors right here genuinely great issues here, just thanks hey buddy, this is a really fascinating article Study it, liked it, thanks for it I am looking to get a qualified writer, long time within this location. Exceptional article! I've read not one write-up in your blog. You are a big lad This can be exactly what I used to be sear…

Right. All kinds of contingencies can be responsible for differential reproductive success. So, what are the necessary and sufficient conditions whereby we attribute the success to natural selection? Or to luck? Or to genetic drift? My point is that the science gets sloppy when we say that we surmise various mechanisms but can't determine which ones contribute how much to any particular outcome. Shouldn't a science be picky about distinguishing one causal agent from another? For example, what are we to make of the notion of "fitness" -- or should we just drop it, since we have no criteria for distinguishing it from reproductive success? Is it just a synonym for r…

As Mordred has pointed out you choose not to take the time to actually study the evidence. Instead you indulge yourself with a mish mash of superficial thoughts and ill informed questions. You imply that the error in understanding lies, as Strange has noted, with those who have studied these matters, rather than yourself. There is a passive-aggressive arrogance in that approach I find quite distasteful. Thank you for your time. You are now on ignore.

I don't knwo where you see any insult. I say that you did not read the litterature and you did not even read my links where are 153 peer reviewed science. you clearly depende a position based on no data, and I can forgive you as it is very common. I insult nobody as groupthink a a very common disease that jhave been identified in academic communities since centuries... as in the story of Germs theory, started with oliver Gordon de Aberdeen, continuing by killing Semmelweiss despite his fantastic statistical work, and finishing with the very commercial behavior of an unrespectful chemist, Pasteur. Please as i said, don't give statement until you are seriously …

There is no hard evidence that the European rocket landing on the comet actually happened. We've all been deceived.

Everything observed is information. (sound scientific theories point to this) Everything observed is in. (reality as observed is not a closed system, it's part of) Everything observed is form. (reality has space, the space in spacetime) Everything observed is mot. (reality has time, the time in spacetime, the method) Everything observed is ion. (greek for "going", going from one thing to another, Alpha to Omega) To lay is to lie everywhere but the present. In the present tense being still is a lie. Everything observed is mot. (latin for "move") Coincidence? If reality is information then it seems to me everything is conserved. Bits of information cannot be des…

Explain the difference between a hypertonic and a hypotonic solution.

The Feynman-Stueckelberg diagrams are a pictorial way of expressing the principle of recursion. It is the recursion principle that propagates quantum information. If we imagine that information is propagated by means of reflective surfaces, and if these surfaces are relative to other surfaces, then the phenomenon of recursion emerges. If we view a surface reflection as a beginning of information (origin point of information- past) and we view the recursive stages that follow as the continuation of this beginning (present and future stemming from the past(beginning)..starting at a certain point and continuing along a time line )-( spacetime continuum)..then we see an …

Moderator Note Note: multiple posts have been split off: several OT posts and their responses. http://www.sciencefo...etry-in-nature/ http://www.sciencefo...-supersymmetry/ Some explanations why I asked a question to the author of thread ”Supersymmetry in nature- prelude to new paradigm” and why this is a legitimate question. Even though is addressed by a lay-man that has very little to ad in this “high articulated debate” between moderators and author, I think that I have the civil right to take information in very natural reality, of physics, astronomy etc. As the base of the thread was the repetitive reflection of properties of physics cubic objects in “a mir…

Strange, on 27 Oct 2014 - 12:21 PM, said: Of course we do... No wonder we get such nonsensical "theories" posted here when people are this divorced from reality. ------ Your beautiful Photos, miss anatomy, and the panorama of the cosmos. You forget that they all, are composed by tiny spherical material objects called atoms and further; and, I think, is for those that poster aim to explain: how they interact between each other; what is the role of distance and why; what is the role of space between them and why. If, this was not the aim of author, I beg pardon for readers and o.p. for interfering in debate. It is really Strange that you bounce in whatever “speculatio…

Almost all problems are caused by language. Beliefs arise largely through language and beliefs are the motivation for individual human actions. It is these actions which cause most problems. Philosopy has not been able to progress because of language difficulties; it's impossible to build on the work of others if you don't understand what they mean. We use words whose meaning varies in each application and to each listener. Problems in business arise the same way but tend to have practical explanations such as some individual is ignorant of an important fact (often caused by language) or has the wrong understanding. Everyone is own a different page.

It sounds like a good idea, in your novel - having a female virologist as the main protagonist. That's very politically correct. It gives your book a good start. However, this good start seems spoiled, when you go on to say - "she and other members of her team are ultimately unsuccessful" Such lack of success by the female-led team, is bound to evoke invidious sexist thoughts. But the thoughts can be ameliorated, by a modification of your novel. Along these lines - Keep the central character female. That goes without saying. But - allow her to have a supporting male character, who will be her companion. Acting as a contrast to her brilliance. Like Dr …

Or just because the equation is wrong. I take a number of samples of several different elements all the same mass of course they are each going to release a different amount of energy because different elements aren't the same. As you can see in the graph.

The earth's core generates an electromagnetic field? Electrons are involved in which part of the process?

Energy is it's personality here, or what I mean when I say personality; it's characteristics, attributes, mechanisms; what I would call it's 'nature' but it's probably not accepted.

OK, let me get ready for some personal attacks and name-calling... I only know of one demographic which carries out these types of suicide attacks ( although it is starting to spread ), and I will be first to name the 'elephant in the room' and ask the question. Would racial/religious profiling not eliminate at least 90% of the threats? Any response to this will be off topic, so please move appropriately,

So I realized it's not my theory that's wrong it's language. Here is a visual representation of my previous Theory of Everything and Nothing: Simple and Elegant. I can't think of anything more right.

Really?!? I sure missed that contrary evidence! If I had actually seen it I'd have had to google up the widespread studies that have been done on the subject. I have no unique insight and never said I did. I have a unique perspective derived from stumbling on the solution to an engineering problem and being forced by naysayers to prove it. I've made no momentus discoveries but have likely made the biggest rediscovery that will ever exist in human history. Truth to tell the biggest thing I did will probably never be seen at all as it will be considered incidental; I debunked the paradigm. If I'm right the paradigm will be seen as so easy to debunk it's…

Over/under recycling of lights density. Through constant progression cycles of lights trajectory/momentum are seen on dimensional seperation of fielded symmetric stabiles. In other words a ray of light condenses inward its gravity (time constraints) allowing cylindrical waves of photon/lapse as density to emerge. On the other hand this density seen as light wavelengths are ejected via destabilizing orbits around their constant movement. This collapsable paradigms of movement converge outside it's momentum yet inside it's collapsed dimensions forwarding its 2nd dimension the ray as a cone of depth. Its rotational mass supersedes it's density so dispersal of cosmic radiatio…

Although I only understood and accepted this recently, matter existed long before the universe had any concept of life or consciousness. So conscious observation most likely doesn't change what any particle is or does... all particles / atoms / molecules were there and doing the same thing to begin with. Personally however, I believe there are systems within this complex mechanism of the universe that make awareness and thoughts project certain effects directly onto particles. How no one knows... and speculations without a mathematical formula likely qualify as paranormal more than anything. I believe the first step in finding an answer will be explaining how consciou…

energy is everything.

@ Ophiolite, The last post was answered but the thread was moved so I will answer again. One already open. Have at er. I must admit I'm looking forward to this sound scientific thrashing you are about to unleash there. Here is the thread. http://www.scienceforums.net/topic/83658-low-energy-nuclear-reactions-cold-fusion-thread-split/?p=810199 (Maybe it might be you who learns something)