Leaderboard

This work is actually fairly decently thought out. Though I'm still thinking about the advantages of using hyper operations in modern physics applications when typically the majority of the math operations are done in Natural units. The advantage of Natural units being all the major units are given an equivalence of length. I'm still thinking on this, but I do not wish to discourage your work as I would like to see it progress further as it has the potential in certain applications on improving computation times. Anyways still thinking on this as well as kicking ideas around in my head on where the application can be more readily useful. Also I have to do some digging as this has familiarity in certain research papers I've read in the past. I can't shake the feeling that this technique is already used in various physics papers

Well its your model, no one will do the work for you particularly since its poorly defined mathematically. Little hint try applying a coordinate system and go from there. I recommend polar coordinates. You will need to define properly and with proper terminology your model if you ever hope to get it off the ground.

I came across this, recently published in Nature : https://www.nature.com/articles/nature25029 " A density cusp of quiescent X-ray binaries in the central parsec of the Galaxy " by Charles J. Hailey, Kaya Mori, Franz E. Bauer, Michael E. Berkowitz, Jaesub Hong & Benjamin J. Hord Partial Quote of the Editorial Summary : "Many black holes in the Galactic Centre Simulations predict that the supermassive black holes near the centres of all large galaxies are surrounded by a concentration of stellar-mass black holes. Such black holes, however, have not previously been detected at the centre of our galaxy. Low-mass X-ray binary systems containing black holes are proxies for single black holes. Charles Hailey and collaborators report finding a dozen such binary systems in the central parsec of the Milky Way. " https://www.nature.com/articles/nature25029 References to and Articles about the Letter have been Published @ : https://news.nationalgeographic.com/2018/04/black-hole-stellar-binary-stars-milky-way-galaxy/ - " Thousands of Black Holes May Lurk at the Galaxy's Center The discovery could help scientists better understand the space-time ripples called gravitational waves. By Sarah Gibbens PUBLISHED APRIL 4, 2018 A gaggle of black holes has been found clustered around the center of our home galaxy, the Milky Way—and the discovery hints at a much larger population of black holes hidden across the galaxy. The discover offers a new test bed for understanding the ripples in space-time known as gravitational waves. For years, scientists have known that a monster black hole sits in the middle of the galaxy. Called Sagittarius A* (Sgr A*), the compact object is more than four million times as massive as our sun, but it's packed into a region of space no bigger than the distance between Earth and our star. Scientists had long suspected that as many as 20,000 smaller black holes were orbiting the galactic center. But as the name suggests, black holes are not easy to see directly. (Find out how astronomers are trying to take the first picture of a black hole.) " https://news.nationalgeographic.com/2018/04/black-hole-stellar-binary-stars-milky-way-galaxy/ and @ https://www.newscientist.com/article/2165505-the-centre-of-our-galaxy-may-be-swarming-with-10000-black-holes/ - DAILY NEWS 4 April 2018 " The centre of our galaxy may be swarming with 10,000 black holes By Adam Mann As many as 10,000 new black holes have been discovered buzzing around in the centre of the Milky Way galaxy. The galactic centre is already known to teem with stars, supernovae, pulsars, gas and dust, and the humongous black hole called Sagittarius A*, whose mass is equivalent to four million suns. Simulations have long suggested that many smaller black holes – those with masses around the same as our sun – also exist in the Milky Way’s centre and the middles of other galaxies, though only a single one has ever been spotted. Combing through archival data from NASA’s Chandra X-ray Observatory, Charles Hailey at Columbia University in New York and his colleagues were able to finally tease out a signal that appears to be coming from 12 stellar-mass black holes that have sun-sized stars orbiting them. " https://www.newscientist.com/article/2165505-the-centre-of-our-galaxy-may-be-swarming-with-10000-black-holes/ I found the nature article and subsequent Science site articles very interesting on many levels, to say the least.

Medicine is not science. It's medicine. That's not looking down on it. Lots of things are not science. Medicine has a long history of using conventional wisdom, rather than empirical data. While it has become more adept at basing its decisions on science, that still doesn't make it science. And you cited an example from > 100 years ago. Not science. To what end? Math does not rely on nature, so there is no guarantee that you can find a physical example to represent any mathematical concept. They are different disciplines, and it has nothing to do with religion. No, it does not.

The answers are mainly in the first paragraph There are a large number of stars created and dying in the centre of the galaxy, because of the large amounts of gas and dust there, so there should be many black holes. They can't be detected directly (because they are black holes) so this study looks for indirect evidence that they are there.

I was thinking more about my own example which falls under the consumption factor not spillage. I found that it causes inflamation over time which in effect causes several consequences...like having to walk up to a mirror to inspect my penile region - „Acute Abdominal Mirrorilemis”

When it comes to jobs that may very well require the sacrifice of your life, all should have a choice. If someone believes in a cause, they should have the right to fight for it and sacrifice the self for it, and if they don't believe in it they should have the right to abstain. It should have nothing to do with male or female. The US draft system is sexist in the least and barbaric in truth.

Assess each person according to their individual abilities. Treating any group in a blanket way does a disservice to those that can.

Maybe

For the same reason the tooth fairy and science are so often separated

Lack of evidence for the existence of oneor more deities. An unwillingness or inability to provide said evidence. More logical alternative explainations for events previously ascribed to them.

Out of curiosity, couldn't you add two modules and each spins in a separate direction? Would that counteract the effect of one? Assuming we have the technology to spin them both to the same speed, at the same time.

! Moderator Note Unfortunately for those in the philosocopter, the clouds cleared to show a looming mountainside. No amount of hands on the collective could pull up in time. BOOM.

In science, you accept the facts even if they don't agree with your beliefs. In religion, you accept your beliefs even if they on't agree with the facts. Science can't be a religion.

You mean if something has just proof science can not use it? Lets say Nature is the proof of God? Why this information useless for them? Aren't they interested about Nature and what/how/why it is? There are quite some good God alternatives here. Thanks op for the special One

You are right. Sorry for the expession. Science has religious tendencies. Imagine the human before the mayor surgery. Doesn't it need trust and faith that s/he lets an other human physically manipulating in the brain? If there is any problem during the operation his/her knowledge and experience and the our technical advancements s/he can believe in... That is science in application I often find that things I find irritating on others are fundamentally my problems... I am in constant conversation and I try to speak about things I think is interesting and important. I layed out why. I work as well so I do not have infinit (chuckle) time.... And you are accusing again... Why I can not take my time to learn and understand... why are you so stressed? We can have different opinion, I accept and respect that. That is why the conversation. There are few questions and recognitions in the thread which you could argue with reason. You seems to be lack of that. You rather accusing most of the time... Are you a scientist? You rather show the tendencies of a tired priest (chuckle) I have layed out a thought experiment based theory on space and time. We discussed the Nature of time and whether it can or can not be infinite. My conclusion is that it is finite and I reasoned this point in the thread. Point please if you comprehend where and why I am mistaken.(e.q expession of Nothing).

Hmmm... based on your knowledge how high would you put the probability that minimum one advanced AI exist longer than 10 million years in this minimum 13.8 billion lightyear big system? Now that we are their at it's gates in our own reality (let it be 1000 years). Does an advanced AI would count as a supernatural entity for you? Any advanced AI supported biological entity could be supernatural maybe? What is supernatural? You, me, we? Maybe for our gut bacteria if they would be able to perceive US. I kind of believe that someOne/something is out there evolving with (in) the system. I would put it's probability on 99.99.9...% I can not imagine that there is exactly One such superintelligent entity exist in the system... Note we do not have the same habitat as they, so what they would want from us? They would want to have earth as a London resident would want the spot of space of an universally harmless bacteria in the Amazon river.... Than what is leading to Advanced AI if not Science...? Or is it the final question? Is there a God or not? There is consciousness in the universe... Who knows how small God could have been.... Maybe the smallest information after Nothing....the moving force behind the velocity of spacetime. Which just had had to be a basic consciousness(fundamental information) in proportion to nothing... Seems to be singular...