Leaderboard

Generally a tensor may be represented as a product of vectors. A “reducing tensor” may be represented as the average of vector triple products. A reducing tensor will also “reduce” to an average of scalar products. Acceleration may be represented as a vector. A field (gravitational, electric, or magnetic) may be represented using “reducing tensors” of acceleration. An “equivalent EFE” may be written as reducing tensors. The equivalent EFE will then reduce to scalar products of acceleration. Suitable definitions of acceleration will give the Schwarzschild metric. Christoffel symbols are not required. Is a “reducing tensor” mathematically valid? Reference; http://newstuff77.weebly.com 02 The Reducing Tensor 02 Reducing Tensors.pdf

Why would the purpose of the data recording matter? I invite you to contemplate why that might be. The recent changes in climate, like the "rise of man" have both happened in the blink of an eye. https://xkcd.com/1732/ We know that CO2 levels have gone up . We know the temperature has gone up. We know that CO2 is a greenhouse gas. In effect, what you believe is that we put another blanket on the bed, and we are now warmer, but the two things aren't related. Are you surprised that you are called "called stupid, brainwashed, denier, ignorant of science, "? And, of course there's this aspect of it.

The nano-scale. You'll likely need to make your question a nano-more precise in order to receive an answer that’s a nano-more helpful.

It's not a design...

Countries that haven't the self-control to avoid shooting down passenger aircraft should certainly not be allowed nuclear weapons. Oh!, hang on... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran_Air_Flight_655