Leaderboard

So you made one up. I think you need to get back to that point of view, and then learn the science. Eise has given an excellent short summary. If you want more detail, then I recommend Feynman's lectures to a non-technical audience on QED. He explains how this works, extremely well: http://www.vega.org.uk/video/subseries/8 (Also available as a book, if you are old-fashioned like me.) There is no communication. It can be shown that this idea does not match experimental results (see Bell's Theorem) From the title: This is what is known as the logical fallacy of begging the question: you start with the (non-scientific) assumption that a god exists, then add the assumption that it controls every photons, from there you derive the conclusion that quantum theory proves that a god exists that controls every photon.

Sure why not? Mathematically, instead of having quantities that change with respect to some time coordinate, you can always have quantities that change with respect to one another, without reference to any notion of time. ‘Change’ doesn’t imply time, and time doesn’t imply change. Derivatives (in the calculus sense) with respect to some quantity other than time are well defined and commonly used. For example, imagine you have a purely 3D universe, without time, that contains a tea cup. The handle of the cup has a certain curvature; the interior surface of the cup also has curvature, which is probably numerically different. So the surface curvature changes with respect to spatial coordinates, rather than time. So you have a universe that encompasses changes, but no time. This is perfectly consistent and valid, at least in my mind

Astrophysicists unveil biggest-ever 3D map of Universe: The map is very isotropic and homogeneous, the large scale galactic filaments are not as apparent on this scale. Discussion? Isotropic: .(of an object or substance) having a physical property which has the same value when measured in different directions. .(of a property or phenomenon) not varying in magnitude according to the direction of measurement. Homogeneous: .of uniform structure or composition throughout. Reference: https://www.ctvnews.ca/sci-tech/astrophysicists-unveil-biggest-ever-3d-map-of-universe-1.5030682

True knowledge sounds awfully religious...

I didn't say you did. I said you concluded God because you couldn't figure out an answer, and that's not how this works. You seem to want to know the "nuts and bolts" of why it happens, and science doesn't necessarily tell you that. Science models the behavior of nature. It isn't equipped to go beyond that. But we do have models that work, and one of those is that (basically) everything is a wave, so when you look at the double-slit experiment (and other phenomena) in terms of waves, you can predict what result you will get.

The analysis of the quantum structure of the five atomic elements composing the coded twenty amino acids and the four coding nucleotides of DNA working in the organization of the genetic code reveals an opposition of their respective constituents in always an arithmetic ratio of value 3/2 according to the parity of the number of their quantum shells. Also, the quantum analysis of the amino acid Glycine, the smallest component of peptides that can be confused with saturated base, reveals the same arithmetic oppositions of 3/2 value of its components by the differentiation, operated according to their number of protons, of its five chemical groups. Genetic code, quantum physics and the 3/2 ratio Quantum analysis of the atoms constituting the genetic code Jean-Yves BOULAY Genetic code quantum analysis.pdf Within the mechanism of the genetic code and therefore among the twenty amino acids, Glycine is distinguished by its absence of radical. Its radical is reduced to a simple hydrogen atom which in a way simply closes the "base" structure common to each amino acid. The quantum study of this glycined base, identifying with Glycine, reveals singular arithmetic arrangements of its different components. New quantum chart This quantum study of the genetic code is an opportunity to propose a new type of table describing the quantum organization of atoms. In this chart, illustrated in Figure 5, the different quantum shells and subshells are presented in the form of chevrons. At the top end of each rafter are indicated the names of the different shells and subsells; at the left end of these chevrons, the numbers of orbitals and electrons of these different shells and quantum subshells are indicated. At each chevron vertex is the orbital where the quantum number m = 0. The orbitals with positive quantum number m are progressively positioned towards the top of these chevron vertices and the orbitals with negative quantum number m are progressively positioned towards the outside left of these chevron vertices. In the appendix, the same type of table is presented describing the quantum organization of the shells and subshells up to the 5th shell (O) and 15th subshell (5g). This innovative presentation, more explicit in describing the quantum structure of the atomic elements, will be used in various tables of this quantum study of the constituents of the genetic code.

In QED photons (or any other quantum particle) take all possible paths, including the paths through the two holes. However, due to destructive interference the effect cancels out nearly everywhere, except on the place where there is constructive interference, i.e. there where we see the interference pattern. No need for Somebody to control where photons can arrive. QED is one of the best empirically proven theories in physics.

In Newtonian physics, gravity is a linear interaction - meaning the field does not self-interact, so it is not possible to attribute mass to it. One could thus have guessed at the end result without needing to solve this (really awkward) equation. For a model of gravity that is non-linear, i.e. where the field self-interacts, have a look at General Relativity as well as it numerous off-shoots and alternatives.

Nice example +1 A little milk but no sugar in my tea please.

By inspection, y=0 is solution. Now, after a couple of tries, one gets the intuition that the solution is some kind of potential function, so let's try that out: \[y=kx^{p}\] then, \[y'=pkx^{p-1}\] \[y''=p\left(p-1\right)kx^{p-2}\] Substituting and finding condition for p and k: \[k^{2}p\left(p-1\right)x^{2p-2}=ak\left(2-p\right)x^{p-3}\] \[\Rightarrow p=-1\] \[2k^{2}=ak\Rightarrow\] \[k=0\] (the trivial solution we found by inspection) or: \[k=\frac{a}{2}\] with which, \[y=\frac{a}{2}x^{-1}\] Mind you, non-linear differential equations may have more families* of solutions. Check me for mistakes. * Typically, not families. Rather, isolated solutions. Edit 1: Please, ask me if you're interested in uniqueness.

I think it's surface chemistry we're talking about here, rather than wax changing phase. Otherwise it would be incompatible with the principles of thermodynamics, I think. Waxes and rubbers have some surprising properties. Rubbers, e.g., cool down when stretched. When long molecules cool down under situations that would normally induce a temperature increase, that's because the very long molecules get more ordered when stretched, instead of disordered. Not same case as OP but, as I said, "surprising" properties. I share the puzzlement. +1 It can't be just the temperature that does it. It must be a combination of temperature, moisture, and most importantly, polar bonding with molecules in the skin cells. Otherwise, I'm clueless about what goes on here. +1. I agree. Again, it must be polar bondings and their effect, having to do with introducing molecular ordering in the very long wax chains.

Please, sorry to repeat again and again: read the entire article carefully.

This has analogies with the organization of matter especially within quarks which are with electric charges of thirds of electrons

If this is numerology, then so is the Periodic Table of Elements! The first two primes for example. and 2 + 3 = the 3th prime. Just 5 is sum of two consecutive primes. Have you a published paper for give lesson?