Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 10/23/21 in all areas

  1. If you are open to new ideas here, I will suggest there's a basic newbie rule everywhere on the web, which is: start out courteous and low-key, then bring out the colorful and wild as you get to know people and understand how your comments will land. Without all the information-rich channels of body language and facial expressions and vocal tones, the limited signal path of a message board means there is more time needed establishing a friendly vibe, humor, genuine intent, etc. If you start out stepping on toes, people may not charitably assume "it is just a fluke." I liked some of your writing, like "naked and crying in a ripped bean bag chair from the 1990s," and don't forget punctuation and capital letters, properly deployed, helps readability and humorous impact.
    1 point
  2. Not only. When you whisk an egg white, it turns a white color without any cooking. ps. Have you started pumpkin season yet? I made a pumpkin pie last week. You need: a cup (i.e. 250-300 mL) of oil, a cup of sugar, a cup of pumpkin, 250g of flour, 3 eggs, a teaspoon of baking soda, a teaspoon of baking powder, and eventually a teaspoon of cinnamon and/or vanilla/vanillin sugar. Whisk the egg white, blend the rest, join with egg white and to 40 minutes to the oven. Takes less time of work than me writing this recipe..
    1 point
  3. Coincidentally(?), this is the troll mantra, and what most every bully, stalker, and other extremists say when their behavior is questioned. I wonder how your experiment would have turned out if you'd actually discussed science on a science discussion forum, instead of posting what you have.
    1 point
  4. Are you just yolking around with this thread? Omeletting that question go, for now. The albumen is called the white because we cook it. It is referred to by color because there is a significant change in color. The yolk stays it's color, so it makes sense to keep calling it the yolk.
    1 point
  5. In other words our youth is being destroyed and you don't even care!!
    1 point
  6. That is (or was) something in the registration process one had to explicitly acknowledge. ! Moderator Note If that’s going to be your attitude, it would be hypocritical for you not to afford that same freedom to other members. Their attitude manifests in downvoting you. It’s not their problem, so there’s no point in going off-topic to complain about it.
    1 point
  7. You may like this image, but we're a science discussion forum. We're more interested in talking about science, so the social aspect is centered around mainstream explanations and learning more science. Most of your posts are NOT focused on science, so they're annoying and extraneous. We invite you to sit around the table and talk about science, but you choose to jump on top of it and shout like this about anything but science. It's unproductive and meaningless, so your posts seem like they're contrary to our purpose. Maybe you should try a site with more of a social emphasis, but I would warn you not to jump up on their tables either. Can you try to behave, or are you a person who revels in their rebel fantasies and won't give them up even when it makes sense?
    1 point
  8. At least we know now what wants to live forever, even if flopping around the floor in little pieces: this thread.
    1 point
  9. In French they do speak of un jaune d'oeuf (et un blanc, bien sûr). I don't know about other languages.
    1 point
  10. But we do call it yellow. yolk is Old English for yellow. (they spelt it geolca) pun intended.
    1 point
  11. Olber's paradox was shown not to be paradoxial at all once universal expansion was detected by E Hubble in 1929 ( I believe ). And Michio Kaku is fully aware that A Einstein's theory is not applicable at lo-separation/hi-energy extremes such as the center of a Black Hole or the Big Bang pre inflation. But saying "We just don't know ( yet )", doesn't sell many books. Being controversial does.
    1 point
  12. I presume that is considered cheating.
    1 point
  13. Try that with a cop, or a judge, when your license says Arete, but you insist on being called Bubba. Let me know how you make out. It could also be that "Ze' is just a way to grab attention, make yourself stand out, cause a disturbance, etc. IOW, spuriously made up. Then why would I need to acknowledge and validate his/her made up pronoun ? Other than as a courtesy ? If you would take the time to actually watch the video @ 2:57, so that you could speak from an informed position, you would hear S Paikin ask J Peterson how he would refer to the trans-woman taking part in the discussion. To which he calmly replies 'she'. Which seems to contradict your claim that he will not address trans people according to their own mentally perceived gender.
    1 point
  14. Your story, while very cute, is not similar at all. Tell me exactly what 'ze' means? Is it a country of origin ? France maybe ? It's easy to make claims. Proving them wrong is just as easy at 2:57 0f the following video ... Sorry about the idiotic title; it was the first one that came up in my search. It is everyone's right to have their OWN world view, and not have someone else's forced on them. Doing it voluntarily is a courtesy.
    1 point
  15. I couldn't agree more. That doesn't mean definitions are free from responsibility to be useful. 👍
    1 point
  16. Another handy trick is to post something that’s actually relevant to the thread topic. You might try that next time instead of judging all these people you’re only just meeting for the very first time in a community with which you’re still only just beginning to become familiar.
    0 points
  17. So much for being thread relevant. Carry on
    -1 points
  18. i was running a social science experiment PHI. i could not alert the test population.... 1. sorry i am sane ( unless you or someone can prove beyond a doubt otherwise), that probably doesnt sit well with you , but i cant help that. 2. by the way, you cant presume to know my angles can you? 3. I am a scientist . and read mostly here. 4. im just having a little fun , please try to lighten up yes? 5. also notice where im posting this thread and ask yourself what is the purpose of a "general area" thread category please? 6. Im have fun, obviously you are.
    -1 points
  19. Hi Im ____________________, you may have seen me in many versions of "Ill help you" get your life on track media applications across the decades dipping into the early 18th century.....you thought II was dead! well, Im back from the great void and simmering ether with a deal better than birth itself! Tired of seeing all those nasty red social slap down points for not being an original member or just plain not being in the inside double standard powers that be forum social elitist group? Feeling like an outsider looking in? are you naked and crying in a ripped bean bag chair from the 1990s eating not even a major food brand bag of chips trying to smoother the pain of not having a 300-1000+ green whole number social score on scienceforum.net? no, oh that probably didnt fit most of our ideal target audience, darn survey shenanigans is what i blame..... no matter, today is your luckiest of days, for a finite amount of time social F.I.T.S. which is a no where near a patented program that was just made right here and stands for Forgetting (or F*%^ ) intimidating thread stigmas, is here to help YOU , yes YOU ! sounds limitless you say........ but how does it work you ask? well Im glad you inquired......let me lay out this ugly bag of snakes for you and straighten it all out so even the wee lil ones can nod yes. for as long as this thread doesnt enrage the powers that be ( and it probably already has) and end up in the "we dont like what you posted graveyard" ill be giving all of you red flagged poor unfortunate souls plus 1s and a text of inspiring words of comfort! WHAT IS HE CRAZY?!!! you heard it right, I dont even know you , but Im going to give you the benefit of doubt like youve never had from your very own mother! just post and show your negative social credit score and Ill give you a +1 . FOR FREE! and if you feel slighted so bad as to give others that post here in this thread plus ones WELL C'est La Vie! "SURE WHAT EVER YOU SAY PAL" is what your saying? and whats the catch? ok you got me, i happen to want to see how many negative reputation remarks can be amassed to me the point of hilarity! to bring a little levity to here of the expense of the emotionally stifled "i think im better than all" so and so's. so give me as many negative marks as you can!!!!!!!!! seriously !!!!!! and surely they will be here with their self endowed massive green marks of glory to put down our effort!( most of them, not all of them are bad honestly, but those of double standards know who they are) with mouse clickers ready to take away your newly gotten green upclick. ( or worse) just ignore them, theyre not like you and havent the understanding you and i do. embrace your gift from each other and feel unalone here in the new wild running running of social science personal character labeling ( no matter if a person is aware of it or not) . YOU ARE A PERSON OF WORTH! except if you arent , and well we can be honest, some people are just plain bad! you know who you are! but rehabilitation may be in your wheel of fortune ....so consider your possible new path to sunny vistas you of nasty temperament. NOW LETS SEE THOSE social F.I.T.S. !
    -2 points
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.