Leaderboard

Excuse me, Sir, but we can't have you barging in here and using parentheses and commas this way. That is my domain. I aware you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.

From your link: Sounds like the way I pictured villages and settlements was not too far off.

I have to wonder about the 'christianity' of someone who claims to be a christian yet pours such invective on someone else who they believe has such a low IQ score. Is that really the christian way ? If so then count me out of it.

It is even worse. @joigus, Sabine H has a blog, in which she spells out her videos, so you can read them in your own tempo. Here is the one of that video. And this is even 'worse' than what you quoted: And in the comments. A commenter: Next try! You keep repeating this. But my list becomes longer... Susskind Gell-Man Kracklauer Sidney Coleman (thanks, Joigus) Sabine Hossenfelder 2 Names added on the list thanks to your references... For clarity, let's take the following 3 propositions QM does not allow for FTL causation. Watch my wording: causation. So no signal, (inter)action, affect, or whatever. The conclusion of Bell's theorem is: no local hidden classical system can reproduce the correlations predicted by QM. These correlations were experimentally confirmed, so QM is right. Conclusion: the experiments can be explained by QM, without needing non-locality. Classically, we would need non-locality. So find an acknowledged author that rejects one of the 3 presumptions that together support that QM is local. If you keep repeating that the mainstream think QM is non-local, then it should be easy. But be careful not to shoot yourself in the foot again.

The existence of an aether - I presume you mean the luminiferous kind - would imply a violation of Lorentz invariance, and thus also of CPT invariance. This has been extensively tested for to very high levels of accuracy: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modern_searches_for_Lorentz_violation Based on the fact that all these experiments came out negative, I can pretty much guarantee you that whatever it is you have in mind will also come out negative. In all likelihood, your specific experiment has already been conducted in some form anyway. Your concerns are misplaced - these tests have all been done already, this isn’t a new thing.

! Moderator Note When discussing religion please limit yourself to citing religious texts, and for science, mainstream science. Asserting that "The Holy Ghost is Electromagnetism" crosses a line into speculation, which is is not appropriate for discussion in religion. And without some kind of theoretical and/or evidentiary support, would not be appropriate for our speculations section either.

It is not 'speculation' and I proved it. I even followed the rules despite you and everyone else breaking them. The fact that you deleted my posts just goes to show how dishonest and quite frankly how cowardly you are. What a stain on the Scientific Community you turned out to be. You really are an 'Evil Liar' like your motto says. I noticed you never go after those that violate the Forum Rules as long as the violations and insults are directed towards myself. That makes you are Hypocrite as well. You should step down as Moderator or just close this subforum as it is obviously a Trigger to your Safe Space. Lol. and used only to unfairly attack anyone that would dare use the Scientific Method as I have to win the debate. All the rest of you that support this behavior should be ashamed of yourselves. You are just as Evil as @swansont claims to be. No doubt you are all very Prideful of this fact, so enjoy it while it lasts. Although you folks do not realize it yet, all of this will come back to you in a very bad way. It always does. I won the debate. You lost. Go ahead and ban me like the sore loser you are. How pathetic. Delete this post too if you are too Chicken to keep it. You big Cry Baby... lol what joke you are. By the way, the rest of you post as if your I.Q. is below 83. I now have confirmation that it is as said. Not a single one of you could offer anything near a counterargument. Unbelievably unimpressive. I would suggest you 'men' out there have your mom buy you some more Tucking Underwear as you have no use for that part of your body anyhow. 🤣 Base12 Out.