Leaderboard

The receiver instantly knows if it is “0” or “1” but they can’t know what it means because even the sender can't know what they sent. In other words. You're saying that somehow, what you say is true, just because you say so, but nobody can ascertain experimentally, or even in principle, that it's true. Your simulation of an explanation is more or less the same in all your posts: You somehow know you're right, but you can't quite put your finger on why it's right, or even what exactly it is that you're right about. At this point I'm only just curious about your convictions from a purely psychological point of view. There's certainly no science to be learnt from anything you say here. And again, quantum particles have no identity: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Identical_particles#:~:text=In quantum mechanics%2C identical particles,one another%2C even in principle.

The non-relativistic Schrödinger equation in thre dimensions is exactly solvable. It's not deceptive at all what happens in one direction, as it's completely separable. The propagator can be obtained exactly and shows equal dispersion --in empty space-- in every direction, as couldn't be otherwise, because it's completely symmetric under rotations. Because the Schrödinger equation is linear, it has no soliton solutions. You are right though in that other very different things are very different things than the thing I was talking about.

Thank you for your reply to my post the photos are the most useful informatuiom you have posted so far. Coin cell bateries may be housed in stainless steel, but there are lots of things on you Nintendo that are not and all, including that battery are subject to some forms of corrosion. Given the photograph which also shows failure of two decoupling capacitors, one showing serious leakage and lead corrosion I would question the history of your apparatus, rather than accusing your CR2032.. I can't identify the orange component next to the edge of the board by the battery, but that looks also to have suffered catastophically and may be the source of your issues.

Lake Nyos disaster is worth googling, on the dangers of CO2 accumulation on a large scale when there's a sudden belch of a lake. The cloud hugged the ground and moved down valleys, killing 1700+ people.

I'm sure others have addressed some of the long established science on CO2 and radiative forcing. I'm just here to point out that you forgot that water vapor amplifies the GH effect of CO2 and throws off your calculations. Increased water vapor in the atmosphere amplifies the warming caused by other greenhouse gases. It works like this: As greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide and methane increase, Earth's temperature rises in response. This increases evaporation from both water and land area. Climatologists have made more predictive models by accounting for this increase in water vapor as a positive feedback mechanism in global warming. As absorbed energy radiates up from the Earth's surface, water vapor is very good at absorbing and holding that heat in the lower atmosphere. And the atmosphere can hold a lot of water vapor - it's a very long way to saturation.

Same energy is not a requirement. Entangled photons can be different colors as long as the entangled parameter is not tied to one energy e.g. if vertical polarization has the higher energy, it won’t be entangled with a photon having horizontal polarization, since you can tell the photons apart.

To entangle two particles they have to have some (common) property that can only take two different values, but possess the same energy. In a bonding orbital you have two electrons that have this property since they must have opposite spins, due to the Pauli exclusion principle. Conservations laws, eg momentum may provide a pair of entangled particles in the right circumstances such as pair creation. But you can't just take any old pair of particles that happen to be close and say they are or will become entangled, for example adjacent electrons in the cathode ray stream impinging on your cathode ray tube are not entangled. Does this help ?

The length of a world line between given events in Minkowski spacetime is defined to be equivalent to the proper time of a clock travelling between these events that traces out that world line. In other words, it’s simply the total elapsed time that’s physically measured on a clock that travels along a specific spatial path between event Excellent short answer +1 I would like to add to the second answer to the question "what does it mean....?" Minkowski imposes a cartesian coordinate system, which as Eddington pointed out a century ago, actually adds unneccessary mathematical structure. The same result could be achieved by a set of events and a set of the invariant intervals between them. This would form a network of linked events, with no cartesian structure superimposed. The sum of these invariants connecting any pair of events as a mathematical 'graph' (since this thread is partly about geometry, whch includes geometrical graph theory) then includes the shortest path. Ref Eddington The Mathematical Theory of Relativity pages 8 - 16, Cambridge 1923 (my ed 1954)

You know what they say "if you build it, they will come." Have a nice game. What list? Don't touch the fire, because it hurts; define hurt and how would it's elimination benefit other's? Or, that other question, how can we use fire? That won't hurt anyone?

Future research will eliminate ten existing questions and introduce twenty new ones! 😁 😎 🙂

By all accounts it seems to have been Ukrainian AD system that went off course. The argument could be made for giving Ukraine mor emodern AD, like the Patriot or ( Israeli ) Iron Dome AD systems, so similar incidents are not repeated.

If you are interested in my private research about the direction of the Wow! signal, you can find it on free hosting infinityfree. Please note, the website is still under construction.