Leaderboard

It could have been reasonable before you jump into conclusions to follow someone threads which are available in this forum to know the reasoning behind the diagram .... 1960 ideas were a stepping stone to get us to this point...without those ideas you go nowhere....as you were publishing the discussions were all already started taking place in this forum in relation to the diagram that I have posted.if you go deeper to following those ideas you will realise what you are trying to do are just a layer before the cores issues outlined by ideas in this and other prior threads. Anyway we are all looking for knowledge. Hi Am still trying to think about the implications of that.... however given the position of an object( e.g Earth) on orbit around massive body( e.g sun) at a particular time is certain,this might be the reason behind that.

Being biased is very human-like.

I think that our use of language is determined not only by the intra-language connections, but also by connections between the language and our sensory / motor / affective experiences. IOW, intra-language connections themselves don't have enough information to generate verbal responses indistinguishable from humans. The precedents should also include sensory / motor / affective precedents related to the linguistic experiences.

I think the gold standard amongst the AI-consuming public for what constitutes an acceptable human-like response will be much lower. If it tells you what you think you want to hear on human-level of consistency, i.e. not perfectly consistent , I think it will be enough for most folk. in fact, I think a 'perfect' response everytime would actually reveal its source. There needs to be jitter built-in probably. i feel that some who are sceptical of 'sufficiently complex' and emergent-process models are inadvertently backing themselves into a Cartesian duality stance.

A hot air gun is probably the option that minimises exposure to nasties (including lead). It leaves any lead compounds in a sticky painty mess which falls on the floor and can be disposed of. An abrasive will turn it into dust which will get everywhere including your lungs. Get a fire extinguisher, just in case. I think a hot air gun is the cheapest option too. One vital point. Do Not Combine DCM And Either A Heat Gun Or A Blowtorch. You will generate phosgene. (DCM is bad, but nobody ever used it as a war gas.) It's obviously possible to add some chemical to CDM to thicken it- because the manufacturers of paint stripper do just that. But I don't know what they added.

@MJ kihara Good stuff, but... you are holding yourself back like 99% people still. Quantum Gravity and all ideas are all 1960s stalemate thinking. Outdated. New diagram Gravity is a elemental matter. Gravity itself is the creation itself. Gravity is a open and closed system that can be open to the ground state. Extracted and harvested for potential energy.

Isn't String theory and QFT and all the stalemate ideas are all pet theories. String theory is one of the biggest pet theories of all times, yet people throw it around as it's not a pet, because of money, completely prove nothing and has not shipped a product for over 30+ years 😒 1960s stalemate sadly.

@Phi for All It's all good my buddy. Trash it 😀 and end discontinued the thread ✨️ Substack has explained the mission to trash all 1960s ideas. And move along to next sites. My mission has been completed 🙌 Let it be known, prime mechanics has be published posted and established.

Serious, after 20 post now you brought a made up a lie? Oh, jeez My 1st post here. After a masterpiece diagram that you can even comprehend. At the bottom I wrote: S_phi = ∫ d^11x √|g| [(1/2) g^{ij} ∂_i phi ∂_j phi - V(phi)] where: S_phi is the action for the scalar field phi in 11-dimensional spacetime ∫ d^11x denotes the 11-dimensional integral over all spacetime coordinates √|g| is the square root of the determinant of the 11-dimensional metric tensor g_{ij}, which describes the geometry of spacetime g^{ij} is the inverse of the 11-dimensional metric tensor g_{ij} ∂_i phi is the partial derivative of the scalar field phi with respect to the i-th coordinate V(phi) is the potential energy function of the scalar field phi This action describes the dynamics of a scalar field in 11-dimensional spacetime, including its kinetic energy and potential energy. The equations of motion for the scalar field can be derived by varying this action with respect to the scalar field phi. The action is a scalar quantity that describes the dynamics of the scalar field phi in 11-dimensional spacetime, taking into account the effects of Gravity, Dark Matter, and Dark Energy through the 11-dimensional metric tensor g^{ij}. The action is used to derive the equations of motion for the scalar field phi, which describes how the field evolves in time and space. This is 100% correct. Dont lie now Also your Fernando thesis paper is incorrect from the equation you posted. I corrected it and you went dead silent and ignore it!! 1960s errors. Not even moderator cant even comprehend and you should of been called out for it.