Leaderboard

Sure, that was me! It had absolutely nothing to do with his response to you. I would have upvoted him no matter what he said. The reason I gave his post an upvote was because you got annoyed that he received an upvote previously. Sometimes I cannot suppress that little bit of troll in me... 🤪

If you are bored, don't trash other peoples conversations.

You can run the 'take my pile if you think it's bigger' method for powers of 2, but not 5. OK, so the first step is to get the 1st pirate out of the way. 1. Rough out 1/5 of the loot, and ask if anyone wants it, if no-one wants it then keep adding to the pile until someone takes it, or if everyone wants it, keep removing pieces until there is only one pirate asking for it, then they get that. A pirate considering whether to take it has to decide whether they are more likely to get more at this stage than if they go to the next, so there is a motivation to 'lock in the deal' early. Then you can do this with any power of 2; 2. Roughly halve the remaining pile and the two pirates standing next to a given pile will spilt it like for two people. If there are 3 or more pirates standing next to a pile, move the treasure piece by piece to the other pile until each pile has two pirates who want to share that particular pile.

I have to agree Migl. The chances of finding a CPT violation is extremely difficult without being a macro system. To get a rather large summary of the CPT and Lorentz invariant datatables one of my favorite look up references for various relations etc is here "Data Tables for Lorentz and CPT Violation" https://arxiv.org/abs/0801.0287 It's a 146 pages of sheer useful datatables lol. It's also been updated this year.

CPT symmetry is based on Lorentz invariance and the locality of quantum field interactions ( as Markus has mentioned ). The symmetry is based on the total of the three properties and each individually ( or pairs ) can ( and have been found to ) violate the ruleas long as the emaining property ( or properties ) make up for it, such that total CPT symmetry is conserved. Since in alarge system ( Avogadro's number of particles ) there are many ways for these individual symmetry violations to occurr, while conserving total CPT symmetry, I don't think there is any way to guarantee that total CPT symmetry of a macro system is conserved.

The red marks/ticks won't change what is the reality....17 February 1600 Giordano Bruno burnt for going against the establishment of his time.... always happen when people forget history,and become overconfident of themselves that they can not stomach challenges... nothing new.

If that is the notion...good luck while you try to look for answers about issues of the Universe like baryogenesis...hope you won't take forever.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nondeterministic_Turing_machine NTMs have exactly the same computational power as standard (deterministic) TMs. They may or may not be more efficient in terms of complexity. This is the famous P versus NP problem.

👀😎 😴🤐🤐