Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 04/24/24 in all areas

  1. To which the first retorts, "Easy for you to say, when your wife makes such good soup!"
    1 point
  2. The explanation is exactly what the maths says - pick a different path, and you’ll walk a different distance. There’s nothing else to it. No, I showed you that there’s no paradox that needs resolving. It seems to me that you’re wilfully refusing to “get” this. There’s no such thing as “relative to waves”, because light has no rest frame. The speed is always between emitter and receiver. Because it’s he who experiences acceleration locally in his frame. The equivalence principle tells us that uniform acceleration is locally equivalent to a uniform gravitational field; differently put, the accelerated twin sits at a different gravitational potential, which implies frequency shift.
    1 point
  3. Really? From his article that introduced the theory that later would be named 'Special Relativity': On the electrodynamics of moving bodies I think it is time to close the thread?
    1 point
  4. I don't know relativity oh my that's a laugh. I would never have have gotten my degrees without knowing let alone past the undergraduate stage. It's literally part of my job dealing with SR on a regular basis lmao. You might want to try again mate For me it's not a hobby or a curiosity but a career requirement
    1 point
  5. That's an interesting philosophical question, do you have scientific evidence you do believe in God? Aww bless, you seem awfully confused, are you saying that a belief in god is necessary to not rape women? Is that why some priest's choose to rape little boys?
    1 point
  6. This abusive approach does not seem likely to make a person “repent and turn to Christ”. Surely it is more likely to confirm them in their low opinion of religions and religious people generally, isn’t it? From a stylistic point of view, some paragraphs would help, too😉
    1 point
  7. The musician finally gave up and began to erase all the lines of notes. His wife walked into the room and asked, "what is that smell?" "I'm decomposing," he replied.
    1 point
  8. He sought the advice of a mathematician who told him to work it out with a pencil.
    1 point
  9. Here's where studying evolution would really help. Eggs don't evolve. Evolution is the change in allele frequency within a population over time. So what happened was that a creature who was almost what we classify as a chicken laid an egg that became eggxactly what we classify as a chicken.
    1 point
  10. Do you have scientific evidence you don't believe in God? Also why are you being a dumb a.? If you choose not to believe females have a right not to be raped because "i don't believe in absolute morals" that doesn't mean "well I don't believe in absolute morals therefore I can't hate that females have a right not to be raped". May I rabidly insult your demonic psychopath self now? Say you have a dad you hate and put him out of your mind, and someone says, "you hate your dad" and you reply in childishness: "how can I hate him I don't think of him!" And if you love someone, you think of them. Are Satan's blinders coming off yet? Seeing your immaturity now? It's really bad man, it's stinking childishness. "But God how could I hate you I only said you didn't exist despite endless evidence, I didn't believe in you that is why I hated on your messengers and rejected Jesus' Golden Rule which I chose to reject and not lying, stealing and murdering." Good luck with that on Judgment Day, your "but God I chose not to believe and stay ignorant and stubborn". Try it, see if your rotting flesh isn't shredded with flails. Bless you.
    -1 points
  11. This is your science you hypocrite? "As soon as you abandon scientific rigor, you’re no longer a mathematician. You’re a numerologist." Meaning what genius? Do you know what science is? Look it up, it isn't "my huffing and puffing and telling someone they aren't being scientific and my personal feelings." Your reply isn't scientific, and you show massive ignorance and superstitious stupidity by saying "numerology" as if means "opposite of math". It means study of numbers you numbskull ignoramus. Duh can't you see the word components you giant moron? Science isn't merely "math" and science has nothing to do with your rigor mortis brain, there is no "science is rigorous" in any dictionary you pretentious oaf. Science is not just basic addition and subtraction that you half learned in your woke rainbow school in downtown Chicago it is also theology, gematria, linguistics, textual criticism (as in the study of ancient texts), cryptology, psychology, statistics none of which any of you seem to be adept in, unlike me, with the exception of statistics, but I do use statistical analysis. It's also archeology, which no doubt you are all repelled by who hate the Bible being that you hate your Creator. Something the load of you babblers don't know due your complacency and hate for God is that the Bible is filled with math codes, that besides symbology, metaphors, riddles, musical annotations, acrostics, prophecies everywhere, codes all over the text, and even encrypted codes. Unlike most of you empty babblers babbling in ignorance I know this as I bothered to study the research, it's all over the net including YouTube, besides that I have code scanning software and have been using it for years. Another thing most of you don't seem to remember is to apply scientific analysis to the supernatural not simply material. For exanple if God hates everyone as Psalm 5:5 says, due to their arrogance and hatred for him, well then as Jesus said count on being confused and blinded, deluded with Satan's hell, God's weapon against mockers, scoffers and arrogant hatemongers. And you love God and are humble and asked him for extreme wisdom (for HIS GLORY not yours) repeatedly, it is reasonable he would comply. So then don't expect to know anything but what is shallow with regards to God's word. Why would he share his secrets with those he sees as imbecilic mocking goblins and next to no morals, morals are required for correct science, did you forget? Yep. Stop with narcissistic gaslighting and feelings babble. You are like the Pharisees Jesus said he was thankful God his his secrets from. Repent and turn to Christ before the Antichrist subdues you and gets your spiritually dead selves to take his mark. Do you know what his name is? I do, your harbinger of doom: he will strike your heel, but you will strike his head God said of his chosen. And when Antichrist comes back to life will you then believe in the supernatural? Will you believe if dead man comes back as a spirit to tell you there is life after death? How many videos of people using ouija boards or going into haunted houses or spots or talking to demons they think are dead people using stupid electronic contraptions do you need to see? You have no brain to "scientifically analyze" what you see and hear, you are that blind and stubborn? So if a rock out of no where hits your eye in a haunted house is it science to think, "oh rocks just fly all the time, oh it must have been a midget hiding in the dark or bats that throw rocks or my friend conspired to blind me". That's your science, conspiracies everywhere. Narcissists are paranoid, big surprise.
    -1 points
  12. When we say that the speed of light is invariant with respect to all frames of reference, it is as if all frames of reference were the frame of the ether. This is also how Einstein saw it, he thought that there was an ether which was stationary for everyone. So the observer is always at rest and the object observed is in motion. The relativistic Doppler effect is therefore postulated as always produced by the observed object. LTs do not contain any indication of the speed relative to light because they are symmetrical and we cannot distinguish this speed. I gave the calculations. ----------------------------- I can't stop because you really don't understand relativity. You don't even know that the hypothesis of the invariance of the speed of light is a useless hypothesis for the theory, and that it only serves to get rid of the ether. ------------------------------- Time is not physical, so you don't age? Why would the wavelength decrease?
    -1 points
  13. TBH, I'm indifferent to the issue, it doesn't even crack my top 20 of thing's to give a shit about; why would I waste my emotional energy, spending my daily chip allowance needs deeper problem's to warrant a reasonable return on my investments.
    -1 points
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.