Leaderboard

Appearances can be deceiving. Everybody, and I mean everybody, is dealing with something. Some are dealing with lots of things. It’s easy to think that you’re the only one. Consider this example: in a country with a constant population of 36.5 million people, and an average lifespan of 100 years, a thousand people die each day, on average. They have friends and family, so tens of thousands of people are dealing with news of this loss. Every day. Many more are dealing with lesser crises. It’s just that most of them don’t show it. You not seeing it doesn’t mean it’s not there.

Plus food quality; Deborah Blum’s “The Poison Squad” is a compelling look at all the junk that was put onto food before we had government protections.

Sorry. I was editing and it came out by mistake. I'm working on a proper answer. Ok. Here's my answer. As @StringJunky said. You need enzymes, if you want to digest anything. If you have molecules that constitute cellular walls it makes a lot of sense that they be stable under a wide range of conditions. Eukaryotes use phospholipids as cellular walls, with the phosphoric group pointing out, and the fatty acid pointing in. I think there are good evolutionary reasons why no eukaryot would 'want' to evolve an enzyme that digests cellular membrane, as it is shared by all eukaryotes in the form of a double layer, like this: It would be like a suicide mechanism for all eukaryotes. Why do it? It's not because nature can't do it. Nature can, if it sets its non-mind to it. Think about N2. A sturdy molecule if there is one. Yet organisms have developed enzymes to break it. But why break down something that's the first chemical step to make you?

I don't think Gen Z people today can imagine what it was like. Daily life went on like none of that was happening though. Our parents and grandparents had seen much much worse.

Based solely on what’s been posted in this thread, it’s hardly surprising you can’t find a mate nor get laid. It’s been an uninteresting mixture of crybaby and caricaturing and cartoonish dehumanizing throughout.

Is this any different than me being involuntarily poor, since I could not find a rich woman who would give me the time of day?

Oops, I've turned them into quantum objects.

With one simple answer: observation bias.

You can tell a lot by looks too, texture, weight, essentially feel, and different hair colors and skin color can have various effects on various psychologies. That's light therapy is a thing. Accent, phonetics, blah blah blah the list goes on if something about any of those things irritates me, it's strange that's exactly what my only options are. Too taxing to go over every nuance of the bs I have to deal with in life, in general I don't see them getting away with this. No literally I look around and everyone else is floating on clouds.

Thank you Phi for All, Mesotron gave birth to the stars. I apologize for my imprecise "sand box" language. Sorry but it's all I have to work with. Big bang creation theory from the beginning of star ignition has been mostly proven correct in my view, except for the misunderstanding of how gravity actually works. What I have been trying to say is, before the time when the stars began to light up the heavens; before big bang expansion, the electronic organization and formation of vast clouds of hydrogen gas from dark energy and dark matter that would eventually collapse into star ignition by the force, mass and power of mesotron, may have taken 100 million years. Exactly how long is not important, but a lot longer than big bang expansion is the point. The part in star ignition explanation where science says "and then gravity takes over" seems to suggest that gravity alone, some how, has the power to create star ignition by collapsing a cloud of hydrogen gas. I don't think so. I predict that one fine day science will say "and then mesotrons take control and collapse the clouds of hydrogen gas into stars...and then gravity takes over." No more magic gravity, only gravity left over from a mesotron that was mostly destroyed by star ignition. As long as you go on trying to cram 100 billion years of evolution into 400 million years, your big bang math cult will live on, but just because your math is alive doesn't mean that it can lead you out of the big ban dead end; that is unless you embrace mesotron and the fact that, in the beginning, dark energy and dark matter became the source of energy for the atomic cosmos to explode into existence. Quasars are the model for mesotron. You are not seeing a black hole. You are seeing mesotron. Galaxies are mesotron winding down. I may be the lone voice calling B.S. to the big bang nonsense, but at least my suggestion of the creation of matter can lead to overcoming a Masotron gave birth to the stars