Leaderboard

There was a geek T-shirt joke about this topic 151.194.25.39 —> is a Public IPv4 address quad. 127.0.0.1 —> is the special ‘Loopback’ address for your own computer on a LAN. 19:08:AF:51:11:08 —> is the MAC or ‘Ethernet’ hardware address of your device in hexadecimal.

Like astronomers' perversion of the term "metals", you mean? 😁

You're doing horribly. You're intellectually dishonest and you have no inclination towards learning anything of substance. You seem entrenched in your confirmation bias, and can't reason your way through the scientific replies you're getting. You somehow think this is a competition rather than an opportunity to educate yourself. We're used to people coming to a science discussion forum to learn. It's not as common to have people join and then insist that their opinions and wild ass guesswork are equivalent to the knowledge accumulated by scientists over the centuries. You act as though education was a punishment your were able to avoid, rather than a goal you missed. I'm sure you're a lovely person IRL, but here you come off as willfully ignorant, which is shameful and wastes everyone's time. People here have studied intensively, and love sharing the knowledge they've gained, so your posts are often insulting in their lack of understanding and civility. You're more curious about what our "red line" is than about science, and that means anything you say from here on out will be in bad faith. Let's just part ways now. There are plenty of wild ass guesswork forums out there for you. This site requires more rigor than you're willing to give, but I guess that's our fault? Goodbye.

If you really want to study this, The subject is called paleoclimatology. Here is a graph of the C02 levels compared with temperature levels over the last 10,000 years. You can see the timestamp from the video lecture by Roger Palmer. The whole video is the first in a series and is 1 hour and forty minutes long. However it is really excellent and I heartily recommend it. If however you would prefer a book, The Emerald Planet by David Beerling provides a different perspective. Good luck but it is up to you to do some work to get up to speed on what scientists have found out and how they found it. Data comes from ice cores, tree samples, rock analysis, deep sea sediments.

Aorta know the answer to this. (chuckle)

Very obtuse of you. Can’t tell if it’s deliberate, but… This is why people accuse you of trolling. The statement above, and this: You asked a question in the first post, and I answered it. By saying “I never said science can find God” you are implying that I suggested you did. It’s not a response made in good faith. You should be aware of your own statements, particularly ones made so recently.

You equate a man made rocket going to an asteroid with the expanding universe. Man is very smart and all of the mathematics and science doesn't end when the rocket takes off. The rocket gets the probe on a course and then the probe is controlled as a separate entity. It is nothing like throwing a dart, the probe is controlled all the way making adjustments as it goes. It is man controlling the probe, Man does not control the universe. Your point is not helpful at all and makes a mockery of my post.

You don't ask questions you just look for a fight, It is not my problem the James Web telescope has failed to fill your hopes. You really do love the word troll.

firslty, humans'd have to focus the real reason of global warming to have good solutions. -about CO2 reason: 2 years ago a 2,000 year old alpine pass (the time of the ancient romans) was found after a swiss glacier melted, but 2,000 years ago there was no greenhouse gas. it's a visible test -> CO2 reason isn't sure, even because there's a real reason scientifically speaking! -real reason: First law of thermodynamics states that energy can neither be created nor be destroyed but can be transformed from one form to another -> biomass energy comes from solar energy, a part of solar energy's transformed to biomass energy so wood production(etc...) removes solar energy from the environment -> it's against global warming, the loss of a lot of forests in the past years is a real reason for global warming.(fires and bacterial decompositions return heat to the environment) -real solutions... 1) palm oil for diesel: this palm's an high growing tree that produces a lot of wood. furthermore, in plantations the tree always grows, it does not die(it doesn't decompose) like in nature but it is cut and replanted, but after the vegetative cycle trunks're used for furnitures etc...-> wood's stored! another aspect to consider is the possible breeding based on waste fronds(about 10 t/ha). 2)pellet from agricultural residues for heating/(new steam engines etc...) 3) wood from forest crops for industrial use etc... to store wood. breeding(based on leaves. goats're an example) in symbiosis with these crops so it's REALLY possible to contrast global warming if good humans want.

Yes, you are correct I may have overstepped the line again so you have my sincere apologies. You still haven't answered my question as to saying I am biased. Why. You must read what I said and keep it in context. You read like an 11 year old. Do you speak from a scientist's perspective if so you must be biased as well. Goes both ways. Being a Christian is an extra quality, not less quality.

the left has the same problems today: social well-being comes later. it's not a priority.

You keep an eye on that blood pressure you know what happened last time.