Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 11/30/24 in all areas

  1. Just saw this in my FB feed. It's different to how I imagined it. I pictured a collision of solids with fragmentation and gravity doing its stuff after.
    1 point
  2. People feel “proud” or “guilty” about what they have done or not done. A simple emotional response for most people. And this depends on previous decisions. And these previous decisions depend on the previous historical decisions of you or someone else in an "infinite" number of loops and interconnections. Parents say: "I am proud of you (because you perform well in school), as a reward here is your new smartphone." You got a good score because you chose to study instead of playing computer games etc. or because of cheating. You got a good result because the teacher taught you well (or ignored your cheats). Quite obvious connections between past events. You are only on Earth because dinosaurs became extinct 65 million years ago.
    1 point
  3. won't particularly matter when you consider absorption distance section. The quoted section makes no sense ALL frequencies are time dependent. The time element is determined via the frequencies in question. So that quoted section will need more than just some handwave statement specifically some form of mathematical proof. You cannot have the same time for all frequencies that is impossible by the very definition of frequency I also hate that terminology " inside time" sorry but that terminology doesn't work and gives the visualization of little matter balls for particles instead of field excitations which is something modern physics now teaches example under QFT I would assume you have some mathematics to your conjecture as its been on your books the past 6 years if not longer and there is absolutely no mathematics for your 2018 thread nothing more than blanket statements. Have you not done any mathematical development in the past 6 years ???? Without the related mathematics you literally have nothing of any substantial worth. You can't even prove to yourself mathematical viability let alone anyone else.
    -1 points
  4. So, it’s magic ! Moderator Note Or at all, since you have given us nothing but hand-waving. No model, no evidence. As such, this doesn’t fulfill the requirements for discussion
    -1 points
  5. I'm just going to make my last post of the day to clarify two things: one, that entanglement across time requires a connection between the particles (an exchange of energy), and two, that my hypothesis is not dependent on entanglement, but rather on the collective unconscious. As evidence for the inter-temporal entanglement requiring an exchange of energy: "Transactional interpretation: Some interpretations of quantum mechanics, like the transactional interpretation, explain this concept by suggesting that "time-reversed waves" can travel from the future to the past, creating connections between particles across time." It's unknown how the particles exchange energy across time, but they must have some means of interacting with each other. Even if entanglement did not exist, there is still the collective unconscious which can be used to interact with distant phenomena across time and space, and while I have no hard evidence of this, in my life I've encountered many many examples of the collective unconscious working... for me this is a fact, but of course it would have to be tested officially to be accepted as theory or fact.
    -1 points
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.