Leaderboard

When you die, what part of the body dies last? The pupils… they dilate.

Oh, sure. That's a great idea. Very simple.

I cannot cover the pool. I can experiment with 'buckets' of different sizes and shapes. I don't think the difference would be so dramatic. If any, I'd expect that relatively shallow buckets heat up and evaporate faster than the much deeper pool. Plus... Buckets have the same or more exposure to the sun. The pool is located on the property in such a way that it is protected from winds. Plus... I am sure that in the last several months I need to add water to the pool about weekly rather than bi-weekly as it used to be for the last 20 years. This was how the project started.

@Imagine Everything I truly find this thread and you truly inspiring, to of started off with an idea that you couldn’t even grasp or comprehend truly how it came to you. But your dedication, commitment and passion to pursue whatever you can find to keep building on your idea and making sense of the insensible. I find this tremendously inspiring and I hope I can one day understand and appreciate the posts on a more comprehensive level when into learn to understand all that’s being discussed here and on the forums. Your scientific knowledge has grown so much in such a short time and I truly congratulate you for all you have accomplished and continue to achieve going forward.

And to add to all of that, pro- and anti-inflammatory categorization is also a simplification of the mechanisms that are happening. Sometimes, it is an extrapolation of in vitro experiments but then it is not clear whether oral consumption would have similar effects, for example. I have not seen smoking-gun level of evidence of the benefits yet. But to be fair, it is easier to figure out harmful stuff (for the most part). I would not glamorize European diets too much, though. The US sticks out but the trends are not great in many, if not most countries. In almost all countries obesity rates are increasing, but I think in countries with a strong food culture the rates tend to be a tick lower. It depends a bit on the precise measure, though.

The members of this forum are seriously biased against religion and even philosophy, so I don't know why you posted in this forum. I suppose you read that this was the philosophy forum so you thought it would be OK. No. The members of this forum believe that science is the beginning and end of knowledge. This means that if the information did not come from science, then it can not possibly be knowledge. It could be imagination, speculation, or maybe garbage, but it is not knowledge. But I found your thoughts interesting. You still need to do some work on your ideas, but I doubt that you will get any help here. Gee

Very good. This nutcase has actually published a book: https://authorfrankdimeglio.blogspot.com/2013/06/author-frank-dimeglio-is-real-agenda-of.html The link is quite funny. After several tirades from Frank, somebody else shows up to ask: "Are you a real person?".😆 And that is the sole comment from anyone other than Frank.

Bye Bye idiots. You can't be that stupid, but you are definitely an ass.

This appears to be the output of a random word generator.

If they found the actual time chemical make up or cosmetic diagnose for example. Theoretically understand how to manipulate it only back in time, as my theory going forward is far superior more dangerous if you fuck with the idea of time travel. Reason being is theoretically there is nothing scarred in the time continume forwardly, so yea... Say these crazy willing to die for the sake of science theoretically gain the cosmetic diagnosis and make up of time. They theoretically manipulate going back words in time. My theory is they would have to be stable and not move to even exist on a past time event, and theoretically they may not even be able to be present in the area they even start and end. Basically they would maybe able to get readings but that might be it, than theoretically they may have to reverse there manipulation out of the past in their designated line of travel. The data they would be able to gather may be as much as environmental reading and that's it, the data they would gather would not be able to actively allow there readings to see time be progressive but instead frozen. It can't be progressive theoretically because of the fact on their inability to actually be there physically. So is time travel even worth it if my theory is correct? And is the data they gain even enough or whatever? Also the reason in my opinion they have to reverse and clean up their travel is if they take the same path again it may not be an accurate reading like the first travel.