Leaderboard

Exactly, it has no meaning except in relation to a proposition, or a collection of propositions judged to be true.

The funny thing is democrats weren’t talking about DEI any more than they were talking about trans rights. The MAGA right wing information ecosystem coupled with Elon controlled Twitter and Putin troll farms force fed these narratives on an endless loop and micro targeted the audiences with extreme precision. It’s adorable that you don’t think I understand the results of the election. Egg prices are high bc companies are trying to remove bias was the message, and millions upon millions of voters were too busy to see how ridiculous that assertion is. Apparently DEI also caused a helicopter to crash into a plane. It’s like a Swiss Army knife of explanations for morons.

It leads either to an issue or a wife with steady hands

Really? People verify their information all the time in our threads. Did anyone say that it has to be personally verified? The point is that AI is known to fabricate information, rather than using reliable third-party references. A short time ago I wanted to know what the orbital velocity would be at the surface of the sun (to point out an absurdity of some claim). I figured someone had done the calculation, so I Googled it. The AI summary said it couldn’t be calculated. We don’t need such nonsense introduced into scientific discussions.

FYSA, the AI policy has been added to the rules

Yes, AI can be discussed. But the arguments one makes in any discussion can’t be AI-generated. AI can’t be used as a source of information. IOW, you can’t support an argument with anything that’s equivalent to “ChatGPT said <something>”

How?

The following was posted in the forum announcements AI-generated content must be clearly marked. Failing to do so will be considered to be plagiarism and posting in bad faith. IOW, you can’t use a chatbot to generate content that we expect a human to have made Since LLMs do not generally check for veracity, AI content can only be discussed in Speculations. It can’t be used to support an argument in discussions. Owing to the propensity for AI to fabricate citations, we strongly encourage links to citations be included as a best practice. Mods and experts might demand these if there are questions about their legitimacy. A fabricated citation is bad-faith posting. Posters are responsible for any rules violations stemming from posting AI-generated content ___ We are happy to discuss the whys and wherefores, and consider modifications. In addition, a reminder that accusing people of being bots, or using AI, is off-topic. You are, however, free to ask for clarification in any discussion, including links to any citations. Faking a cite is easy, but a valid link with one is a little harder to manage.

Plz use password Thomas Walker to read the document Life Everlasting.pdf