acsinuk

The magnoflux spin effect is a new physics explanation of how a magnetic field will spin if activated by a voltage at right angles to that field. In classical physics the ions would be attracted straight toward the anode or cathode but the magnoflux spin effect as demonstrated in the salt water cell shows that the deflection is accompanied by an extra un-accounted for spin. Watch the effect here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dllAJzPI0LY

In classical physics it is assumed that galaxies obtained their rotation at time of big bang creation. However, researchers in the 1990's established that galactic clusters could be formed by a strong magnetising field which is surely producing their spiral spins.

Yes, radio signals are magnetic waves and move at near the speed of light so are not limited to electron particles

The Norfolk Island effect was discovered in 1945 when scientists found that at dawn and dust disturbances on the suns surface could interfere with radio/radar signals. So the fact that there is a magnetic link between the sun and planet was demonstrated and established. Now this link is permanent for as the earth rotates then the link advances around the world until in 24 hours it comes back to start again.

Classic physics consider that like charges will always repel each other; yet in the nucleus of molecules they are forced together short range by the Casimir effect. Is this at variance with the standard model??

Thanks for your replies. But just think, if I take off in a rocket and go straight upwards for 12 hours then parachute directly back down I would land on the other side of the world as in that 12 hours the whole planet has rotated half a turn!

The Coriolis effect is a new physics explanation of earths rotation . If the flight route distance is 11,000km and aircraft speed is 880 kph in classical physics terms it should take 12.5 hours each way which is confirmed for north/south routes. But due to Coriolis 3D rotation effect the east/west routes in fact takes only 12 hours from London to Malaysia but the return flight from Malaysia to London takes 13 hours as witnessed in flight schedules. To save fuel; fly east into the sunrise. Happy Whitsun landings

Mordren If the stars radius reduces then to maintain the angular momentum the spin rate must increase. Do you mean matter momentum or the magnetic momentum of that material?

Yes, the Wiki explanation is great. A thimble full weighs 100 million tons??? Well, it would be much better if they just stated the facts. A magnetar is emitting huge amounts of energy in the form of electro-magnetic gamma rays etc, and stop speculating about how the energy was formed; which is a question that electric engineering experts will need to answer not astro-physists. They do confirm that the energy has something to do with magnetic momentum rotational energy which I will follow up with later.

Sorry for link try this " ". My MS surface 8.1 cant copy and paste url ? If your flash player is not working then look at 3D magnoflux blog part 9 which has a copy attached. The helixing of ions by a magnetic field has never been recognised before and calls for modification to physics laws and maths to cover this effect. Also, Magnetars; of which over 21 have been discovered, many in our own galaxy, had not been witnessed by our esteemed forefathers such as Einstein; now, need to be explained. Dark energy and matter are almost certainly the electro-magnetic forces associated with galactic magnetisation which in our galaxy centrers on the induced magnetic hub in Sag A* As there is no evidence that the galaxies are not magnetised except ancient citations then we must assume that the universe is magnetised and reassess how galactic stars are spun with minimum collisions CliveS

Here is the link to my repeat of the magnet flipper video " www.YouTube,com/watch?v=dlAJzPIOLY " . No citations will be provided as this is new physics and our esteemed scientists of the past such as Einstein had no knowledge of the magnetars or the helical spin created by magnets. The inner universe is magnetises and unless you can produce positive evidence that it is not, then physicists should assume that not only the solar system but the whole of the milky way galaxy is magnetises from the magnetic hub situated in Sag A*. CliveS

I have repeated the magnet-flipper experiment and uploaded a copy on YouTube which you can see by Googling "ACSINUK YouTube" and selecting the first video. The universe is absolutely certainly magnetised. If you have any proof that it is not then please declare it and at the same time explain how magnetars manage to exist and emit gamma radiation.

The WMAP experiment was made to prove the universe would balance with just gravitation and inertia; but it did not balance so the dark forces were dreamed up. Faraday rotation experiments confirm magnetization and neutron stars can't exist. Existing theory is insufficient to explain any of the above but if the universe is magnetize we have spin and if galaxies outer stars repel each other we have expansion. All we need to do is work out what the strength of these dark electric and magnetic forces are!

See magnet-flipper vortex video YouTube clip. There are several and I have repeated the experiment with a 12 volt battery electrolysing a NaCl solution with magnet as cathode and a carbon rod anode. It works a treat. Will do a YouTube of it tomorrow

The magnetisation of the universe is absolutely essential otherwise the transmission of light which is an electro-magnetic energy vibration will not be possible. We know from Faraday rotation measurements that this is probably the case but proving it is something else. The magnet-flipper video demonstrates that ions are spun helically by a magnetic field which if applied to a galaxy would result in the stars spinning into spirals as witnessed by cosmologists who using only gravity have no explanation of this phenomenon. The stars, which are positively charged environments, all repel each other electrostatically which not only stops them colliding with other stars in their own galaxy but also results in the gradual expansion of the volume of the universe . To mathematically balance the forces, we will need to re-visit the WMAP results and forget about dark energy and dark matter; just attribute the forces in the universe to their electrical origins

Yes, like charges repel each other in galactic terms at 23 times the force of gravity. But now consider; if each individual galaxy is separately magnetised; then it will be rotated by a magnetic force that is at right angles to voltage direction and there you have it, an electro-magnetic universe that balances as shown in the 3D magnoflux blog

The large scale structure of the universe is the result of electro static repulsion of galaxies whose stars are spun, as demonstrated by magnet-flipper vortice video; in spirals and bar-spirals by the 3D magnoflux or magnetic momentum energy that is linking them together magnetically. There is no spare magnetised space inside the universe; so the universe can only expand around the edges into the unmagnetised space of nothingness. The Faraday rotation investigations are proving beyond doubt that space is magnetised and this effect must be taken into account in order to balance the universe. For galaxies this repulsion accelerating force is about 23 times stronger than gravity and is called dark energy.

The evidence that magnetism is a force that can rotate particles is shown on the magnet-flipper vortice video. If this unaccountable magnetic force is applied to a galaxy of stars then both dark matter and dark energy can be visualised, in my opinion, as a 3D electric magnetic-flux affect

Yes, dark energy is in my view the incorrect name for the dark repulsion force that pushes stars apart. Now if that repulsive force were electrostatic that would make sense to me. But to spin galaxies in bar spiral all together we will require to have a common magnetic field extending outward from a magnetic hub holding the galactic stars in position; thus avoiding collisions. Do you think the standard gravitational model can explain how bar spiral stars are held together without some modification ?

The horizon program on Thursday casts doubt on the existence of gravity waves; as the ripple could be cosmic dust generated. Anyway, this is just as well as gravity is attractive not expansive so would makes balancing the universe even more difficult. Dark energy should in my opinion be renamed dark force as we are looking for a repulsive force to push the galaxies apart. A sort of repulsive accelerator.

Sorry for the typo. Yes, I mean the real and imaginary components of EM light. The parity connection is from the idea that the real EM component helixes forward clockwise but imaginary EM component helixes forward anticlockwise. This is mathematically similar to the Eular progression as during any 2 cycles together both average to zero but yet exists as an electro-magnetic tube or tunnel through which the 3D electricity or light passes. Thus, external electric or magnetic fields do not affect the overall velocity or angle of transmission. CliveS

The fundamental question you pose is are there rear and imaginary components in Electromagnetic light. Well Faraday discovered electromagnetism and electrical energy long ago and later established that light was electromagnetic also. A really knowledgable article on Faraday effect on rotation in Wikipedia states in its final paragraph "The composite magnetic/plasmonic nanostructure can be visualized to be a magnetic particle embedded in a resonant optical cavity. Because of the large density of photon states in the cavity, the interaction between the electromagnetic field of the light and the electronic transitions of the magnetic material is enhanced, resulting in a larger difference between the velocities of the right- and left-hand circularized polarization, therefore an enhanced Faraday rotation." The power grid runs at only 50 hertz but still the current moves at nearly the speed of light. AC electric theory is easier to study than light and engineers are well aware that grid power is comprised of an area of current being pulled forward by a voltage at right angles to the current. If the phase angle is incorrect then the 3D electric power is reduced by the cosine of the angle and reactive current [ either inductive or capacitive] produces VAR's which are imaginary power instead of Watts. I am not aware that any physicists have yet identified the rear and imaginary components of a light or whether the 2 3D components will rotate in opposite directions as expected in the Euler series. CliveS

ajb, we do need new physics to explain an alternative 3D universe as SM even with Higgs is insufficient in my view to stabalize the universe. All the evidence from WMAP is that their is no dark matter detectible in the solar system and certainly no dark energy has been witnessed pushing the stars apart in any of the galaxies. Could be there are 3D electric force in deep space but to date that has not been detected either. CliveS

Happy New Year John, This thread appears to have been transferred to speculations which I certainly object to. Concerning your point that classic physics does acknowledge magnetism I take it you mean the domain theory; but mathematically this does not described the 3D nature of the magnetic force at all; as the particles inside the magnetic material have not changed physically or chemically. We will just have to wait for the voyagers to find the evidence I guess. CliveS

Yes, they certainly should know after 20 years of experimenting but perhaps they have signed the official secrets act? What is the difference between an unmagnetized metal bar and a magnetized one. As far as chemistry and classic physics nothing. As far as electricity and new physics are concerned there is a whole universe of difference. Happy Christmas CliveS