cixe

I gave at least one link that graphically shows great circle planes. If you cannot figure out what a great circle plane is or how to conceptually create one, then I can help you figure it out via one of the links in my post plus others if need be. I dunno what AFAICT is. Is that a mainstream term? Do you have a mainstream dictionary with that acroynym or whatever it is? I'm not sure what foundation your talking about. If there is a word or sentence you don't understand I can try and help you. I'm not aware of any tests invovling any of my comments as stated. r6 Why would I compare what two? I missing some part of thoughts above. If you mean by "not widely accepted" you meang eometry is not mainstream, then you may be correct. I know my last formal education of geometry was in 9th grade. Many people may not understand geometric terms like triangle, polygon, sphere/spherical, octahedron, polyhedron. Many people avoid math like it was a disease and I must admit to be very dense in the brain when it comes to mathematics. I guess that is why I like geometrical math because teh visual part doesn't require all those complex fourmale of algebra etc... most of that goes way over my head, tho I have have learned some simple algebra stuff along the way in doing my geometric explorations and ponderings of their specific numerical sets as potentially related to all aspects of our cosmos. imho. I.e. my personal pursuit of theory of everything via relatively simple geometric pursuits. imho r6

Hi I'm Cixe or r6. G.E.Diploma big fan of Fullers Synegetics ideas and my extrapolations thereof. They Call Me Gem Cixe alias OS-jbug perhaps a diamond in the dip casting Rubies onto the road pearls from the sea silica out of quartz cyrstaline tears protein bells photo-pops pie in the sky? or, a sandstone humus combing my terra-cognitive loosening the pebbles in my brain absorbing the fungus among-us feasting on moonlit vegetation bathing in the algae and bacteria I liquify and evaporate, towards cosmic heaven.

Regarding great circle planes( GrCP's )--- i.e. axi of great tubes imho ---I've arrived at two possible scenarios that add to the desired 206 mass differrence between the electron and the muon electron. (8 * 25 ) + 6 = 206 I like/prefer this option above, because, it allows for only using the GrCP's of 3-fold and 4-fold polyhedral systems and not the 5/phi-fold. 450.11A 25 GRCs ergo, this means that were using the VE/cubo-OCTAHEDRON,and that we're in the neighbor hood of my considerations of an electron particles association with the OCTAHEDRON and specifically the its 3-GrCPS, that are found in the contracted VE/jittebug cubo-octahedron ergo double-valenced as 6 GrCP's. http://www.rwgrayprojects.com/synerg...s04/p6000.html 3, 4, 6, 12 = set of 25 GrCP's http://www.rwgrayprojects.com/synerg...gs/f5011a.html So, we may say that we have 8 sets of the above 25 GrCP's + 6 GrCP's and that may be the only actually set that is double-valenced. http://www.rwgrayprojects.com/synerg...gs/f5011a.html I know this all appears somewhat adhoc, but then again, if others have any other ways of arriving at the desired 206 then please share them. Not likely any have any solutions. This approach is the only scenarios I've ever seen that works. In some ways it is like my questioning in many groups-- and couple of forums --- for years, that, if any others know of any toy-like, hand held models, that will present/express more cosmologically exotic shapes/confgiurations, than the VE/jitterbug/cubo-octahedron, then please share. Fullers discovery of the jitterbug is the Euclidean basis for a relatively simple Operating System of Universe( OSU ). In ten years, none have ever offered anything else for the latter above, and now I'm offering this new challenge to others here at Sf(n), to present any way of arriving at the desired 206 mass differrence between electron and muon electron, that, have significant correlations to geometry or whatever, and is not just a summing arbitrary sets of numbers to 206. Cixe/r6 The mass of muon electron is approximately 206 times that of the electron. Below is two ways of adding together great circles to arrive at the desired 206 or come close to 206. (7 * 25) + 31 = 206 ..31 being the 31 GrCP's of the 5/phi-fold icosahedron (8 * 25 ) + 6 =206 ...could be 4-fold, 6-GrCPs or 5/phi-fold, 6-GrCP's... I believe the electron is associated with the 4-fold octahedron's, double-valenced set of 3 GrCPS' but neither 3 nor 6 evenly divide into 206 206 / 3 = 68.66 66 66 206 / 6 = 34. 33 33 33. 206 / 9 = 28.88 88 88 206 / 27 = 7.62 96 29 ..3^3 = 27.... 206 / 81 = 2.54 32 09 87 ..3^4 = 81.....