s1eep

I see you ignored the rest of my post.

If there is life after death, there definitely would be a copy of ourselves out there where we could resume our lives, or possibly there are more than one dimensions to our lives; when we die, we change to a death dimension; this could be an ultimately greater dimension. In dreams you are able to use senses such as proprioception and noiception, with full control. We create environments with our minds and desires, and we have commonly good experiences. The dream state is there, for it has been experienced. Why can we not change to a dream state in a dimension where that was possible? What I'm suggesting that when we die we return to a place that is so complex (or we return to a certain complexity), we are in a living dream, we may be exactly like ourselves, because a 'spiritual' copy of ourselves existed in this dimension that co-exists with us right this second. Dream-states occur, some place in all the dimensions there may be a place that has produced a constant dream-state. It may be the aura of the World. I believe in life after death, none of your wordplay will ever change my mind. And I'm not stupid, it's arrogant to believe you are intelligent on this matter because you are not the self of the individuals in question. They haven't come back to tell the tale.

I was told, genocide can cause an orgasm one-hundred times greater than sex; I guess that this happens by psychological impulses and chemical reactions in the body (such as adrenaline). Here the surroundings may play a part in our total orgasm; the things we look at, the things we relate to, we can have imaginative thoughts on the beauty of our metaphysical persona. If I had killed one-hundred men in an organized terrorist attack, the police fear that I am overcoming can be an enlightening prospect. We may feel ultra-masculine, and with religion applied, like hero's for an ultimate objective. The event that's unfolding is related to us in such complex ways, that we are having orgasmic experiences with the meta-physicality of life. Can our systems react with the metaphysical that we interact with during a psychotic-induced orgasm? It could be described as a "streak" perhaps, if your species killed, in pre-historic conditions: pre-sentient man, or pre-intelligent man, many people with your right hand, your right hand evolved. An animal may become reliant on a certain technique, and this technique, because of it's current difficulty, may cause it rush upon completion. Can the body evolve via psychological/physical orgasm?

Intelligence can be related to arrogance because intelligence is an unfair competition, we are forced to be in the same pool, and we must understand each other. You are not as important to everyone, as you are to your imaginary simplification of everyone; the egotistical thought that you are a benefit to everyone is false, the observed genius would not be worthy of the meaning of intelligence to some people, everyone leads different lives, but by a common with which they can inter-relate. If this inter-relation is intelligence-based, it is likely to be unfair, because of how intelligence effects our quality or quantity of life, or reasoning and rationality.

I think you have made a mistake; a persons insecurities can be because of real life pressures, therefore a persons personal "insecurity", is not breeding arrogance, but rather the enmity between geniuses that causes them to interact with each other on such a frequent basis. I suppose it can be thought of as intelligence, but I would say it's reality-based. Reality is arrogant, as well as other 'socially perverse' things. You could say it was luck and pin it to the person but it's not necessarily luck and the scene which brings geniuses together is more to blame - predisposed luck.

Before the human pursuit of understanding life, what were humans pursuing?

Humans are the only known species to use word-communication, and all other species communicate traditionally. The methods that other species use are similar to each other, primarily they talk with signs and symbols, or through exerts of masculinity. Humans have trained their tongue to talk words; they communicate with their own minds to think. The vocabulary is quite extensive, there are many attributes to the word, it is an intelligent technology, but it is natural? Aren't we somehow differentiated with nature; shouldn't we be talking in signs and symbols like the rest of the animal? A man's mind is silent, are we meant to think in words? Isn't thinking a skill attained by rote-education? (i.e. teaching your tongue to say words and routing their associations in mind). And although I said that words were an intelligent technology, are words of the same intelligence as humans or are they beneficent for human beings and their lives, survival, reproduction, social means and so on - and are there more traditional, and possibly greater alternatives?

How is that understanding life, and not the parts of life that are attributed to yourself? It's the same as me asking, "How do I understand your thoughts"? And you respond with a wiki page encircling thought; that wouldn't be understanding, you are a conscious creature, you could be thinking anything, I'm almost guaranteed to be incorrect about your thoughts if I tried to answer "What are you thinking?". How do you know that other beings in life don't have cognition and emotion of their own, through which a more complex sense of life for them can be achieved, one that you may understand if you could access it, but you cannot. Why is what the Sun may feel not a significant when understanding life? If you truly knew everything, you would know my next move and what each and every star looked like close up, the types of life on other planets, etc. You do not understand to the highest degree possible, life, and that is not the word simplification of life (the life you know), that is all of it's associations (the life you don't know) - you do not know enough about life to question it, you are not life-worthy, prior to having your say. You do not know what is central to everything in the universe, everything is an individual and has it's own personality. Because you are a different life form to these things, you cannot know what they mean, or meant, truly, by living - and they are just as significant as you are to life. Life is like a complex question that is weighing on your head, you cannot answer everything, but you can answer some. You haven't got enough information to build a correct basis of life let alone to answer the question. What is life? Looking around, what I sense in myself, everything about myself, my perception, my pattern recognition, my body, etc, it's much more complex than something that can be defined on wiki. It's even got 360 degree 20-20 vision, how do I speak in the language of what I see? Can I even understand anything about life in the way that it was meant to be? There are so many visions unheard of and not experienced. To truly understand life, I would need every vision. That's impossible. The life you understand is a simplification, of things that are much more complex, so complex that it indicts you as unworthy of life, to even question it. It's just something you can apply to every life, but the application is egotistical - you believe that the subject is dead, or life-less, and forget that it has things central to itself, that you don't know.

That is confusing human education and natural wordless education, and you do not understand life in a broad sense. I asked you to explain before, I'll ask again, what then is life?

You do not understand life in the broad sense (i.e. the whole of life), like it is presented to humans; the state of mind prior to education. A wordless mind.

Is reality a lie? Are humans supposed to be living for the femininity of Nature, and not in the masculinity of themselves? The human species had become a civilized people, great minds invented great things and gradually humans built a reality. They use words to communicate - and this is a notable trait, no other known species has a word-based language. A human’s best understanding of life comes from its own masculinity; words it created, and other inventions. But is this the path of true intelligence? Shouldn't we be harmonized with the femininity of Nature? We were born natural thinkers, and we have natural instincts; a human evolved, but they have evolved for a particular reason, to greater benefit their harmony with Nature. Is the fact that humans are more alike the Earth than they are the universe a sign that we should be affectionate towards Earth, in order to reap the benefits of life only obtainable with human to Earth interactions (such as evolution, or good feelings)?

But you still don't understand life; when the pursuit of understanding life is concerned, science is not the best methodology, is the point I am correctly making. Why is productivity significant? For what reasons is science associated with human intelligence? (i.e. people have the capacity for science, it would be intelligent to credit it where life is concerned; why is that so?) EDIT: inb4 something totally irrelevant, "i don't understand", depression.

I agree. Science, like everything else in the universe, has got too old and now exists as a aged entity that's only good due to it's productivity. It makes cool things, that's all science is now a days, it's coolness. Scientists themselves may deny this fact, but enjoy the egotistical boosts you get from being a scientist, and having the reputation that scientists have socially; they even use it to their advantage subliminally; they are associated with intelligence, socially. For the understanding of life, a youthful subject, science is a lesser methodology than spirituality, because it has edited life too much to suit it's own ego and idea of understanding.

You can't imagine a square circle, that's illogical. The only things you can imagine are life alike things, since that is where your pool of knowledge comes from. If you can imagine it, it is possible, because the universe(s) is without limit. It is infinite, if you can build a mental picture of something, it is likely it is already in the universe, since the universe is much greater than you and probably had a similar thought. You may even create it, the universe(s) are so massive that they have infinite dimensions- each move you make is but a ripple in space-time, creating possibilities for future events. Your imagination, with the correct powers, could create life. It is in that much harmony with the universe; if you try to imagine a square circle you cannot but if you try to imagine a dragon you can; that's because it is more life alike. That was a illogical example.

Free Will is an illusion. It does not exist. We are given liberty of ourselves, and ourselves are a finite organism with limited configurations; I can only use my arms the way that they were meant to be used; just because I have the choice between using any of my body parts does not mean I have free will, I have dominion of a finite system. We can only ever use ourselves were confined to; we may be able to take ourselves to particular activities but we can only interact with them in a number of ways. I guess free will is the illusion of having so much difference, and being able to choose between doing many different things, but only what yourselves are confined to. Freedom in limited space. I suppose it comes down to what you mean when you say "will".

Whatever, it's easy to understand. You could even discuss it assuming it was wrong it's worded so understandably. It's not wrong, but I'm just saying. Your imagination is weak. Stop responding if you're not going to discuss it.

That was word-salad. It's simple, there is you, and everything else which is the life you live in; you cannot possibly comprehend all of it, the most you can do is try to comprehend parts of it at a time to broaden your intelligence and maybe come up with something in the future. It is a total organism that you exist with, and it is far more complex than your mind can comprehend. How do the two co-exist? The whole of life, and the individual in life. Same question, different format. If you don't understand it this time, you are the dumbest man on this planet, and my discussion with you is over. You're either suppressing discussion, or too damn egotistical.

You've dodged the question again.

That makes no sense. Life, in broader sense, "the whole of life", is more complex than you, it is so complex you can't understand it, but you are supported by it. You see the light from stars light years away, but you never see what's going on in closer, possibly more meaningful range. It is that complex, you can't acquire the knowledge you need to define life. You don't know what it is, you believe your own perception of it to be sufficient enough credit to claim yourself as above life, or to have life comprehended. You are no where near comprehension. You do not know what these things mean, you what they mean to you. What supports us against this incomprehensible meaning? (I've reworded my original question, it is not the same question, but with a bit of effort, and wordplay, you can see what is meant. Now let's not do the typical modern day scientist thing and discuss meaning, it specifically appoints an aspect of life you can see in front of you right now. With a bit of leniency, you can discuss it. It is possible for you to discuss; and if you 'don't want' to discuss, then your opinion has no credibility, it is egotistical. You believe you are 'more intelligent', and that's it. It can be regarded as a type of laziness.)

It's possible to change what is significant, but nonetheless, Earth is our primary source of food and drink. Another reason, without Earth, humans wouldn't exist. It is as much a significance ancestrally as it is for survival; though, it's possible to believe you are above the Earth, is that not only part of it's greatness, that it allowed us to adapt with this much liberty? If afterlife exists then the Earth may be a significant for it to occur. It is the reservoir of the human spirit. That's a maybe, I do not know. I still don't understand how you can't grasp the complexity of life. I'm going to get poetic; it's so different and vast, there's so much you can't do; look around, you cannot believe how much life can be crammed into your vision, you can see stars millions of years away, and there are way over a trillion stars, probably infinite, in the universe. The 'complexity' of life is there; how are we supported when life is complex like it is? And what I mean with nature is that I want to evolve, and I want to evolve naturally, so it's good evolution, like the evolution that came prior. You are a scientist but you do not believe in evolution, you just theorize it. I truly believe, meaning, with my body, mind and spirit; it is my objective. It's not yours...

You are welcome to your own opinion.it's not something I have proof for, just a superstition. I hear your words of wisdom, I just don't believe them as of yet.

The perfect harmony of life, basically, the universe expanded, and life made perfect everything within the constraints of what it expanded to; there was a perfect harmony of life. That's hard to explain, but I had a try at it to give you a break of the hard stuff.

I'm not saying that didn't happen, I'm saying it was perfection in the criteria that was met.

When it came into formation.

Of course it makes sense, it means that what's on Earth is above you sometimes. Go ahead and try and find food and drink, for the majority, Earth is a significance.