Sensei

It's not just boolean true or false in the case of lie detector. There is list of dozen questions. List of dozen truth questions person has to answer. List of dozen lie questions person has to answer. From it, examiner is learning, how body of somebody is behaving when he/she is telling truth (just saying something from memory), and when he/she is making stuff up. Then graph is checked against to compare, with questions that are important. If graphs from test "truth questions" won't match each other, and important question, or test "lie questions" won't match each other, and important question, the whole examination is void. As person is trying to cheat examiner. The same is done with voice recognition and comparison of signature: there is data to examine, and there is reference, to compare against it. (see MRI lie detector checking brain activity during making stuff up, versus remembering it from memory) Obviously it's useless for somebody with mental problems, or who has hallucinations. But such person would be excluded (or at least should be) from being interrogated by court also! I gave example of graduated cylinder not accidentally. I knew somebody will tell that volume will be volume, no matter what, like Greg H. It's analogy and example of unexperienced lie detector examiner. Who does not know that pressure and temperature have to be taken into account while reading data.. Please notice, in the case of this thread, there are two lie detections which should be done: one with Anita Hill and C.Thomas. Problem would be if lie detectors would show up that they both saying truth. As their versions are mutually exclusive. That depends where DNA is found. On victim or somewhere in room. If police or prosecutor found DNA on coffee or wine cup, in a room of deceased murdered person they will treat person whose DNA is on it, as the first one to be suspect. So better don't go to somebody apartment just in case he/she is murdered an hour later, as you will never be able to clean from accusations... There is plentiful examples, were somebody visited deceased person, or even lived with him/her (how they couldn't leave DNA everywhere?), and police used DNA found on place to prosecute innocent, even though there were people swearing they were with him/her later when murdering happened and they could not do it.. Nobody seems to understand that in 99% it's not important what lie detector will show up. What matter is reaction of somebody to fact they will be examined. The real guilty will fear it and decline passing through. While innocent will have no objections to being examined and instantly agree to do it to have peace.

Take for example decay of unstable isotope in a box. At the beginning of experiment atom has rest-mass m0 thus energy E0=m0c2 (it's in the same frame of reference as box) After decay one decay product has rest-mass m1, but relativistic mass is [math]m_1\gamma_1[/math] and energy is [math]E_1=m_1c^2\gamma_1[/math] Second one has rest-mass m2, but relativistic mass is [math]m_2\gamma_2[/math] and energy is [math]E_2=m_2c^2\gamma_2[/math] Total energy E0, prior decay, is equal to E1 and E2 (plus what they gave away to medium) at any time after decay: E0=E1+E2 Initial mass is sum of relativistic masses of decay products: [math]m_0=m_1\gamma_1+m_2\gamma_2[/math] Decay energy is: [math]D.E.=E_0-m_1c^2-m_2c^2[/math] [math]\gamma_1[/math] and [math]\gamma_2[/math] are not constant. They are decreasing from their maximum at decay moment to 1.0 with time. While particle decelerate passing through medium in a box. If you will start analyzing it from frame of reference of particle that decayed, box will be accelerated in direction of particle movement instead, and particle stationary. When swansont says "mass" he means "rest-mass". Somebody else might interpret it as "relativistic-mass". That's why I am always saying rest-mass or relativistic-mass to not confuse reader, which one I had in mind.

You're right. I rushed too early to reply. Have to remember to reread fiveworlds posts multiple times prior replying.

Linux the first version was released 1991.. https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linux It was not "command-line prompt on Windows", but MS-DOS for IBM in 1981. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MS-DOS

Yes, it does. And liquid too. It's called thermal expansion. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermal_expansion Being too small, does not mean it's not existing. Some alcohol meters (Thermohydrometer) has thermometer inside, to be sure at which temperature reading of volume is done. http://www.ebay.com/itm/Proof-and-Tralle-Hydrometer-Alcoholmeter-Distilled-Spirits-Moonshine-Alcohol-USA-/291510995251 See, there is even table attached what readings will be at which temperature.

In the most of court cases there is no need to ask details during lie detection test. The all details were (or at least should be) given during testimony. Just ask questions: "did you lie during testimony?" "did you hide some important information during testimony?" etc. Just to correct some misinformation, that appeared earlier in this thread, about usage in court: According to various sources: "in Japan, polygraph evidence is admissible in court". Also "In one US state, New Mexico, polygraph evidence is (conditionally) admitted in the same way as other scientific evidence." http://lawschool.unm.edu/nmlr/volumes/13/3/07_note_lie.pdf "In the United States, most states permit polygraph test results to be used as evidence where parties have agreed to their admissibility before the examination is given, under the terms of a stipulation. " http://www.polygraphis.com/WebsiteFAQ.htm In the laboratory you use f.e. graduated cylinder 100 mL, that has +-1 mL (+-1%) tolerance. And you don't complain that it has not perfect accuracy. And yet you complain that lie detector has no absolute accuracy. Everything has some tolerance for error in measurement. It should be calculated at the end of measurement.

UI means User Interface. The all modern operating systems have their own UI (or GUI = Graphical User Interface). Search terms in Google.

Chikis, when I am having objections what result will be I am opening Open Office, entering some random chosen a,n (f.e.), and math formula. f.e. in your case: A1=some a B1=some n C1=A1-B1 D1=A1+B1 E1=C1/D1 F1=-E1 (or -1*E1) Then you can make a graph: A2=A1+1 select some A fields, Edit > Fill > Down. And whole A column is filled with values incremented by 1 (for example). Then fill the rest B-F Select E column, and make line graph from it. You see how it's changing with variable a.

Looks like numerology to me... But there is no single definition of "mile". There is Roman mile, English mile, Scots mile, Welsh mile, Russian mile... etc https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mile Even now there are three: International, nautical and U.S. survey mile..

What evidence are you talking about, when in such cases there are always only word versus word? She passed lie detector test, he refused. What else evidence can be added or found.. ? None. There is word of politician/judge/celebrity/etc high society member versus somebody else much lower class, typically. In her case, she was also from almost the same class, attorney, professor on University, and yet her word was ignored, and she discredited. If professor in University testimony, supported with lie detector test, is not reliable, then whose testimony is reliable, especially "John Doe".. ? It's not about molestation, but about lying in front of commission which is supposed to investigate whether nomination is good choice or not. What is sense of existence of such nomination commission if they are biased, and ignore everybody testimonies.. ? All of you are simply supporting view that people should not come up with true, just keep mouth shut and mind their own business. Because if people will tell truth, against high society member, they will be discredited and their life devastated.

Because now (16 April 2016) was released movie about this story. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt4608402/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clarence_Thomas_Supreme_Court_nomination http://www.imdb.com/title/tt4608402/

Such allegations always appear after the fact. There would be no nomination (or whatever else) in the first place, if allegations would be known in the past. Isn't it obvious and logic.. ? Your point is void. It looks like this: There is president, prime minister, minister, parliament member, or other politician, celebrity, etc. Somebody with knowledge how to speak, who is used to public speeches, eloquent, intelligent, with team of lawyers and people who advice behind his/her back what to tell, and how to tell to people believe. And there is average "John Doe", Alone, without anybody who will advice (and if there are some, they are from opposite to politician group, which means they degrade his appearance (because of their own politician reasons)). Person who is not used to public speeches, who is afraid of them, and being attacked by either media and people supporting politician. His/her life will be examined with the all detail to discredit him/her and immediately brought to press to make unbearable pressure on him/her. There is his word, against "John Doe" word. In front of cameras. Person will end up talking cheap. And nobody will believe. Obviously everybody will rather believe politician, as he/she can persuade people to believe. After all without this ability he/she would not be promoted. Now, "John Doe" pass through lie detector without any objections, while politician refuse to be examined. In her case, Anita Hill, it was secretary of parliament member, who was member of parliament commission investigating nominations, who called the all old employers asking "do you know of something about C.Thomson what could discredit him?"..

For example?? If you don't know him in person, there is no single reason, you would vote for him not for being judge.. What a gibberish.. Only people with serious crime on conscience can say so... (who can try to discriminate finger prints? who can try to discriminate DNA test?) Lie detector is extremely good and reliable. It's no joke, one guy in front of me, told he is murderer, he used to be soldier, commando member.. Lie detector is just a single step from reading mind. If you put lie detector of somebody lying, he/she will sweat instantly... Testimony in front of God (typical one for now), versus testimony with lie detector, the most reliable one, is second one, If somebody tells me that lie detector is unreliable it's immediately turning red light, that they committed some serious crime they won't people know about it... Delta1212, what did you do.... ? Trying to discredit lie detector is like trying to discredit finger prints, or trying to discredit DNA tests, but lie detection tests are more reliable. As people know what they did or didn't. While finger prints one can leave accidentally (drinking tea/coffee for example).

Clarence Thomas, disgusting nomination, and betray of democracy.. Guy who molested womans, she passed lie detector test (Anita Hill), he has been nominated to US Supreme Court Justice... That's disgusting to justice. Until he pass through lie detector test. Which he will never do... That's disgusting to democracy. ps. if you would put him in front of lie detector, he would piss off, because of afraid of being examined.... ps2. I don't want to be accused to attacking just russians. Like here: http://www.scienceforums.net/topic/94549-russian-democracy/ Nationality does not matter, really. It matters what you do, and who you are, really. I will threat all sides equally.

If we have equation in form: [math]\frac{a}{b}=\frac{c}{d}[/math] We can multiply both sides by b and receive: [math]a=\frac{b*c}{d}[/math] Then multiply both sides by d and receive: [math]a*d=b*c[/math] In your case it's: [math]-\frac{bp}{cp-a}=\frac{bp}{a-cp}[/math] so after rearranging it's: [math]-(bp*(a-cp))=bp*(cp-a)[/math] [math]-(bp*a-bp*cp)=bp*cp-bp*a[/math] [math]-bp*a+bp*cp=bp*cp-bp*a[/math] [math]bp*cp-bp*a=bp*cp-bp*a[/math]

6 months? It's way too small amount of time to learn anything to be ready.. Unless you will be doing it at home 14h/d, writing projects for yourself the whole day. Do you already know C,C++,C# .NET Framework,Java,JavaScript,PHP,anything? Buy C,C++ book (or use C/C++ on-line learning materials), download and install free Visual Studio Express from MSDN http://msdn.microsoft.com/vstudio/express and start writing. At the beginning book will have some examples (typically taking arguments from console and output to console, such tools are now obsolete, now matter GUI). Something that you would use by yourself. For instance make math calculator as project. Make GUI in GUI builder, learn how to attach code to execute after user clicked and interacted with common controls (button,text,listview,progress bar etc.), One such project a day, in 6 months you will have 180 apps, and plentiful of experience, with code that you can actually show. Electronics engineer should be familiar with robotics, so get arduino uno starter kit. f.e. http://www.ebay.com/itm/New-Ultimate-UNO-R3-Starter-Kit-for-Arduino-1602-LCD-Servo-Motor-Relay-RTC-LED-/221451495178 You will have to join electronic circuit knowledge with a bit of programing. After weeks you will have enough knowledge for f.e. making led advertising boards with programmable and animated content. And sell or lend them to f.e. shop owners directly. Computer programmer can work anywhere, as you just need good English (already you have), computer or laptop, permanent Internet connection, and PayPal account to receive money from your clients. Google for "freelance programmer" What is your country?

Computer bit can have value 0 or 1. Do you think it's complex? If you put together 8 of such, you can have 256 different combinations, If you put together 4.7 billions of such bytes (~38 billions of bits), that's all videos and games ever made (including the all future) and sold or stored on DVD.. [math]2^{38,000,000,000}[/math] Looks like quite a lot of combinations that are possible. It's enough for the all books ever written in the past, and future (single book would have to have more than 4 million pages to exceed that (uncompressed) size, couldn't be even taken to hand because of weight). 1 gram of water has 3.34*10^22 molecules. Each of them can have plentiful different energy states. Now imagine how many combinations of these molecules can be formed from just 1 gram of water..

We are all family. Close family of humans. And family of living organisms on the planet Earth. I was walking street this week, after rain, noticed some snails going in pretty wrong direction, straight to the road. I took my "cousins", as always in such case, put them in safe place, far from fast moving cars, to save their life..

"Ghost voting" http://www.wisegeek.com/what-is-ghost-voting.htm To be able to press button for somebody, parliament member has to have ID of somebody, and put it in the electronic reader. Computer "thinks" somebody is present in the chamber, while it's not true, as he/she is not present in the building/chamber.

I didn't know whether put it to politics or to "The Official JOKES SECTION", both fit IMHO quite nicely. See this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B7sH4zLPBb8 russian parliament members vote for their missing colleagues, every one voted for 4 in the same bench, one even voted for 8... Maybe it's open day in state duma, and they are just visitors?

What's your country? The majority of western countries went digital radio https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_radio

Fiveworlds, is of course, nickname of member of this forum, who replied the first to your post, and wrote post #2 with source code......

Pair productions are always symmetrical. Momentum of electron is equal to momentum of positron. Just their vectors are opposite. Kinetic energy of electron is equal to kinetic energy of positron. [math]h*f_c*2 \rightarrow m_ec^2\gamma+m_ec^2\gamma[/math] fc - Compton frequency for electrons/positrons. Equal to 1.23559*10^20 Hz (gamma=1.0) Momentum of proton is equal to momentum of anti-proton. Kinetic energy of proton is equal to kinetic energy of anti-proton. [math]h*f_p*2 \rightarrow m_pc^2\gamma+m_pc^2\gamma[/math] If higher energy is used than required, the remaining energy is in additional kinetic energy of newly created pair, equally divided by two to each charged particle. So if you have ~2 MeV initial photon, The electron will have 0.5 MeV kinetic energy and positron also will have 0.5 MeV kinetic energy (in other words gamma will be >1.0 in the above equation). The remaining 1.022 MeV energy is converted to rest-mass of electron-positron pair. [math]K.E.=m_ec^2\gamma-m_ec^2[/math] Energy prior pair production (energy of incoming photon) must equal to energy-mass post pair production (including their kinetic energy).

Say you have 1 Joule energy, this energy can be used in 1s, giving power P=1 J/1s = 1 Watt or it can be used in 1 ms = 0.001s, giving P=1 J/0.001s = 1000 Watts or it can be used in 1 ns = 10^-9 s, giving P=1 J/10^-9 s = 10^9 Watts. Star which is in deep space release energy per second, in the all directions, using inverse-square law: P=P0/(4*PI*r^2) P-power/area of star recorded at distance r from it, in units Watts/meters square. P0 - initial energy released by fusion from object using its own time per second in Watts = Joules/second. Bright hot star will release plentiful energy (photons) per second, while dying red dwarf will release f.e. thousands times less energy (photons) per second. Star emitting large amount of energy per second, will last short period of time, burns all fuel, and collapse, explode or other way die. Star emitting small amount of energy per second, could live billions years. It's fuel will last for long time. It's estimated that red dwarf can live trillions of years https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_dwarf If time would not exist in deep space, star would not be able to emit photons toward us.