Sensei

Look at my 100 mL bottle of brine after year (literally) of leaving it alone: One electrode was plugged to positive, and other one to negative DC (several hours electrolysis): For several months crystals grow exclusively only one of them.

So far I am aware that you're using words you don't understand meaning, in pretty random order..

Tell me: why neutrinos/antineutrinos were needed in the first place? Which conservations these particles cover.. ? ps. Are you aware that neither electron, nor neutrinos, are not baryons.. ?

This is just to show that you're talking about things you have absolute no idea about... "I didn't make up DM. It just coincided that the modelling of gauge forces I've done over the years turned out to need a baryonic coupling involving an electron neutrino." You dont even know WHEN these particles are created! The most basic thing in the quantum physics! What pair production?? Pair production that we know from laboratory is not creating neutrinos. Electron neutrino is created by beta decay plus, 2nd particle is positron. Electron antineutrino is created by beta decay minus, 2nd particle is electron.

Tell me: when electron neutrino is emitted, and when electron antineutrino is emitted.. ? Do you know?

Why electron neutrino? not f.e. electron anti-neutrino.. ?

There is video of whole accident. http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=522_1425183348

What particle you made up.. ?

It's well known that nucleus can make exotic atoms with other negative particle. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exotic_atom f.e. with muon- is called muonium: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muonium with pion- pionium: http://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pionium with anti-proton: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antiprotonic_helium There is also positronium: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Positronium The thing is they are extremely fast decaying..

You can't provide math for something that's basically made up.

It must be magic.. Anti-gravity (if it'd exist) would have to use negative mass, to reverse direction of force vector. Examples? Car producers don't make money on selling gasoline or oil.. That's petrochemical industry that is resistant to new technologies. BTW, have you ever heard about hybrid cars, LNG engines or Tesla electric cars.. ? But it's hard to persuade people to use f.e. electric cars. You need to charge them frequently. Which is difficult on road far from home. No. But there is serious difference between distilled water (electrolysis doesn't work, or so slow that it's barely visible. I was running 15h device and got not a single bubble of Hydrogen while using distilled by me 2L water)., tap water, sea water and brine. If you will use two different metals for electrodes placed in water with salt, and connected by wire, there will be flowing tiny tiny current through wire.

You need to learn how it's in your country. f.e. in western countries you can't just like that sell something to public school or public company. School/gov/company needs to make tender for something, with described detailed specification, and then there is picked up the best offer. Which might not be yours. Especially if product will be (I assume) your only product in catalog. And bigger producer can offer similar for less (buy monitors with retail price) or below costs. You might find more reliable (without tender) clients in private sector. You need to buy one touch monitor for experimenting.. No shortcuts. Not doable. Touch monitors are not cheap. http://www.newegg.com/Touch-Screen-Monitor/SubCategory/ID-514 The nicest one from this section is http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=9SIA24G1GC2409 Because it has small black border, without visible name of producer. Which would nicely invisibly blend with black color desk with right size. I don't know this producer, so don't know about quality of image. Looked from point of view of seamless integration with desk.

GeneralDadmission, if you really want to fill gaps in your knowledge look & read the all articles in Physics History Database. That should keep you busy for the next year or so.

1m30s, didn't she say "sea water".. ? Inside of engine when there is used water + salt, there will be growing crystals, which is serious issue for long term usage of such engine. I had 250 mL bottle of brine year ago, leaved it alone, and now crystals have up to 4 cm size around it.. But he is using battery - clearly visible on video. To split water to Hydrogen and Oxygen. He didn't mention how often he needs to charge battery.. f.e. Bosch S5 S5007 12V 74Ah accumulator, fully charged, would be enough for doing electrolysis of 200 grams of water.. and then empty..

IMHO it's easy by looking to what velocity given energy is accelerating particle. If I have free electron at rest, and give it f.e. 100 eV, it'll be accelerated to v=5931000 m/s. Electron accelerated to 0.866c has double it's mass! Half from invariant mass-energy, and half from kinetic energy. Such electrons are clearly visible in Cloud Chamber, as long thin traces.. They're ionizing medium they're flying by (and losing kinetic energy, slowing down). If they slowed down in CC to our frame, then how can they *still* travel at speed of light, inside of some nucleus.. ? Now look what energies are needed to ionize elements. Last electron ionization energy (when element has Z protons, and 1 electron only) E=13.6*Z^2 for Z=1, E=13.6 eV (Hydrogen) for Z=2, E=13.6*2^2 = 54.4 eV (Helium) .... for Z=118, E=13.6 eV * 118^2 = ~190 keV (just approximation) This pattern is easy visible in this table: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ionization_energies_of_the_elements_(data_page) It's nowhere near 511 keV kinetic energy for v=0.866c, not to mention higher values.. If Uranium traveling near speed of light will decay, products it will emit will be f.e. blue shifted and observer at rest will notice even more powerful particles than he would expect from Uranium at rest. Otherwise energy conservation would be violated.. Another thing: when something is traveling fast, photons are blue (red) shifted (depending on direction), so shouldn't the same be with MBR? If we have Deuterium traveling so fast that MBR (not to mention visible light from stars) is blue shifted to E=2.2+ MeV then it's enough energy for photo disintegration of nucleus, and splitting it to proton and neutron, yes? no? (to blue shift 2.33 eV green photon to 2.3 MeV there is needed 1 mln blue shift... quite extreme situation, and even more for MBR->2.2+ MeV)

Such "lab ethanol", "industrial ethanol" is often made using some chemical reaction in factory, not by yeast and distillation. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Industrial_ethanol Fractions of reactants used to make it are still in product.

Slightly off-topic: forgot Edward Snowden and Chelsea Manning cases? Attack on, arrest and prosecution of pro-democratic defenders.. ?! Forgot Alexander Litvinenko case? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poisoning_of_Alexander_Litvinenko Yeah, right, "everybody" has access to polonium-210 "around corner". Similar like any terrorist goes to shop "around corner" to get rocket launcher vehicle and tank... There is one way to stop such people. Permanent way.

After many days of distillation I finally finished distilling 4 kg of sugar + 16 L water + yeast + feed + raisins set up (started 19 January). And presenting you detailed results of each stage. Including amount of energy needed for running hot plate, time (both from watt meter) and water for cooling and costs. Setting this up cost around $5.08 (price of sugar + yeast + feed + raisins). So, total $5.08 + $4.77 = $9.85 needed to produce 1786 mL of ethanol ($5.515/L). Percentages of ethanol are so good after 1st stage because it's distillation in water bath (so there is needed to cook 800 mL + 2-3 L of bath). Without water bath typical results were average 50%.

On Earth it's radioactive alpha decay of heavier elements.

No. Helium-4 is not the easiest particle to accelerate to near speed of light. The easiest is to accelerate electron/positron (CRT televisors were doing it billions of billions times per second, pixel on screen is emitting R,G,B just because millions of electrons hit it and gave it their kinetic energy, which was converted to photons and emitted by screen to us), then proton, then deuterium, then Helium-3 nucleus. then Tritium nucleus, then alpha (Helium-4 nucleus) (assuming we're talking about stable particles, or near stable T) The heavier particle, the harder is to accelerate it (the more energy have to be spend on acceleration). Proton/antiproton is 1836.15 times more massive than electron/positron. And Helium-4 is near 4 times as heavy as proton. Compare speed of sound of gas Hydrogen (H2) and Helium-4 (He) with the same room temperature. Hydrogen has 1310 m/s, while Helium has 972 m/s.

Look at this video on YouTube This is exactly about subject you're talking about showed in OpenOffice SpreadSheet. Which you can download for free from http://www.openoffice.org

But you are not.. Electrons don't travel around nucleus with speed close to speed of light..

Please notice that signed short is differently extended to short int, than unsigned short to unsigned int, Unsigned are extended by clearing upper bits 31-16. Signed are extended by populating 15th bit of short. Like I showed in post #24. After extending 16 bit -> 32 bit (or 64 bit) it would work. Extension might be in code (like in Motorola we were using EXT.L (16->32), or EXT.W (8->16)), or made by CPU internally (so offset is real signed short, it's just different interpretation of 15th bit).

Boris Nemtsov, critic of putin, has been killed 27-Feb-2015 Wiki: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boris_Nemtsov "Close to midnight on 27 February 2015 in Moscow, Nemtsov was shot four times in the chest as he was walking near the Kremlin with a female companion. He was on the Bolshoi Zamoskvoretsky Bridge when "several people" got out of a white car and shot him in the back, according to the Russian media." BBC source: http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-31669061 "A leading Russian opposition politician, former Deputy Prime Minister Boris Nemtsov, has been shot dead in Moscow, Russian officials say." "In a recent interview, he had said he feared Russian President Vladimir Putin would have him killed because of his opposition to the war in Ukraine."

Terrorist's attack in Ukraine on Sunday 22 February 2015 recorded on video, 4 people dead: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DhyNs3xXheA It was paid $10k by russian's gru according to counter-terrorists that caught men who did it on order from moscov: Mine was radio wave controlled. Caught men (according to Ukrainians counter-terrorists forces): Source on Ukrainian's gov website http://www.sbu.gov.ua/sbu/control/uk/publish/article;jsessionid=A73CAF12B4A4EBFD161E80EC50F3B375.app1?art_id=138430&cat_id=39574