Sharanjeet Singh Mand

May be big bang its a cycle processes, after some time when the force emitted during big bang will finish or the kinetic will turn fully in potential then universe may again start contracting to the singularity .i know this is some thing new but i feel it make sense because a static universe is a dead universe , untill there is a flow of energy!!!but the question is that how every where is a center of universe(it is probably a obstacle -assumption )but if there is some center the celestials or matter must be denser at center or at edges.if it is that means it will contract if the push of big bang stops (due to imbalanced gravitation, it will choose its center automatically .possibly energy serves as the space or surface to the expansion of matter.

reading all you discussion i feel you are not able to understand the question is that , was there something before big-bang?let us say it was a universe contracted to a size of sub-atomic particle , then where it came from, if one can answer ?except stupid religious theories!!!!well matter came into existence after big bang as famous equation of Einstein proves.Dear Byron, "bigbang is considered as creation or beginning of universe not expansion of very small dense universe ". well what was here at the point between Nothing and creation of universe.i know its still unknown. but if anybody can help upgrade my knowledge ?

"How could time be nonexistent? Something may not be happening on the perceivable scale, but even something solid is going to be moving. The molecules that constitute a table are going to be constantly bumping into each other despite the appearance that the table is solid. The movement of atoms is dependent on what we know as time. Without time to separate each individual moment, they would all happen and appear at once. Say, for example, we were to trap a single Hydrogen atom in a container and within this container time didn't exist, we would see that the single Hydrogen atom fills the entirety of it because it is occupying all possible points within the box at all possible times. Obviously we don't have the technology to be able to remove time, but my assumption is that we would see something similar to what I stated above. " - Byron. Iam talking of the time before Big bang therefore , most probable assumption is that there was only negative energy before that , there was no solid, if according to you molecules were already there then big bang will not be considered as beginning of our universe???/!!!!You may consider the flow of energy waves as a happening but i dont thing so that negative energy has any waves. till now the best assumption is there was nothing before before big bang ,if some one says that there was a parallel or multiple universes then the question of beginning of everything and beginning of our universe will not reaming same . will both have different answers?

Haw can this alleged start of time occur when there wasn't any time before time in which it would start? Time is merely a measurement of some sort of difference between two happenings so you may consider time as forth dimension.but as stated above time cannot exist until some thing happens , we are not very sure if there was some thing before bigbang or not. Einstein some where tried to prove that energy is subjective to time and matter is subjective to energy so time would have been the first thing to come in existence.But both are contradictory !!iam not sure of any dimension called hypertime but i feel there can be many more but hyper time will be a extraordinary measure of time only.