"How could time be nonexistent? Something may not be happening on the perceivable scale, but even something solid is going to be moving. The molecules that constitute a table are going to be constantly bumping into each other despite the appearance that the table is solid. The movement of atoms is dependent on what we know as time. Without time to separate each individual moment, they would all happen and appear at once. Say, for example, we were to trap a single Hydrogen atom in a container and within this container time didn't exist, we would see that the single Hydrogen atom fills the entirety of it because it is occupying all possible points within the box at all possible times.
Obviously we don't have the technology to be able to remove time, but my assumption is that we would see something similar to what I stated above. " - Byron.
Iam talking of the time before Big bang therefore , most probable assumption is that there was only negative energy before that , there was no solid, if according to you molecules were already there then big bang will not be considered as beginning of our universe???/!!!!You may consider the flow of energy waves as a happening but i dont thing so that negative energy has any
waves. till now the best assumption is there was nothing before before big bang ,if some one says that there was a parallel or multiple universes then the question of beginning of everything and beginning of our universe will not reaming same . will both have different answers?