Jeremymfs

fredrik, This was the only discussion I have read with you in the loop. I was speculating based on what little information you wrote above. I would agree that I got a bit off topic. I will open a new discussion if that is the proper thing to do now. My comments were simply to give credit and appreciation for your mindset. I find it refreshing. Jeremy

Directed to fredrik (molecule) Pertaining to your overall views represented above, I would like to comment. Your perspectives appear to communicate an overall sense and acceptance of the potentially ambiguous nature of Reality; possibly allowing for an answer void of meaning or understanding. In this way, you seem deeply rooted in your commitment to yourself to remain objectively grounded in the face of probability being at the root of all existence. From this posture I sense a "freedom from fear" attitude that is probably at the core of your understanding that the universe has and will operate in the absence of "human perception" and ideas. I believe that this freedom from fear is essential if one is to delve into the realm of physics because "Reality's Truth" must be more important to find than to not be proven wrong. Correct me if I am wrong, but you appear to have the general understanding that Reality does not require your cooperation or understanding to exist. This is also why I speculate that you reject Quantum Theory's dependence on the observer. I admire your courage and commitment to this mindset. You are simply trying to narrow the gap between you and your understanding of Reality; knowing the entire time that you will never arrive at your goal. I think this can also be categorized as insanity...but you are proof that it does not have to be painful. Good day, Jeremymfs