cameron marical

how is it debatable of the fact that we as life forms evolve without just random mutations but actually genetic differences to better fit there environment. things couldnt just be random like that. its alot like muscles, we need better ones, we develop better ones, we dont, we dont, right? arent humans a good example of that? our different skin pigments? lighter skin, come from a snowier place, wich white reflects sun, and also blends in. brown, from hotter places, like mexico, and alot of america, to not be as harmed by the sun by just getting darker instead of getting damaged. black, well im sure they have a reason too. alright maybe thats not a good one to use for an example. same thing, with different wolves. white for snow, dark for forest. and i know, it could just be random mutations wich just happen to fit the best for the present evironment, and those who dont mutate, die, wich forwards that one mutation to become common, but i just think that that sounds too far-fetched to belive that we are as we are by coincidence of gene abnormalities that just happen to be perfect for the environment we live in. what do you guys think?

i know that there are severall types of pathogens, but is one or more of them actually considered to be alive? if so, how? there so small, i thought that they can only be inconveniant shapes that get in the way. they have no mightocondria, and surely there too small to have any thought process that we know about{let alone any organs, or blood for that matter i beleive} so how could they be considered alive?

what is a charge in an electron or proton?

what exactly is mnemonics or whatever? is it where you just convert everything you experience into pictures? if so, id have to say im against that, well, kind of. i think that focusing on just one way to memorize something is as unhealthy for mental processes as not doing any at all. you should do others, like try to remeber things by smell, or taste, or all at once. then i think is when you can see a greater mental capacatie and abilites. or just do something like new like walk around with your eyes closes like voltmans link suggests. the way it describes how it works really does seem benificial.

why would it only exist for a small amount of time, just keep it in a vaccum, with no light getting to it, and it should be safe right? and i read about something about pair production, no lhc's involved in that.

but we scientists use math for experimentation. how does that connect?

how exactly do they make postitrons?

i know this is a reall general and broad question{and stupid/new to this world sounding}, im just wondering what kind of answers ill get. i love math, but when i ask myself this question, i seem to lack the answer.

nice reply jersicl, though i cant help but wonder about that ngst thing answering how it all began, how it will end, and energy creation. how? though i do like the shaman part. nice.

so what are the ways people are trying to force nuclei together? any new ones?

only if your traveling at 1 g.

so an electron and proton, is alot like matter and antimatter, am i right? one is equal to the other through opposite states, and they cancel each other out. is there such a thing as an quantum antimatter explanation? if so, whats the name? thanks.

hello.

how many tests have been done? does any one know? im sure that the iss and space lab conducted some. id like to see the results.

but not relative to your own. and besides, there off earth, and not connected with it at all, are they? so why would earth be included at all?

really, i hadnt heard about it. what was the name of it, do you know? id like to read up more on it.

ok cool thanks man.

so why dont photons just keep going through anything? they have no mass, so they arent changed or directed by electrons or protons, are they?

...i dont know if this was directed at me, i was asking for the location of this fancy math thing.

though it is impressive the amount of work you must have put into this ahmed. the others are right, you do need to test this and mathmetize this for it to become a real theory. so if you do that, then maybe it will be considered better. for now it is regretebly just speculation. wich theres nothing wrong with. speculation is the begining of everything.

sweet. so if you say ionize something to a great degree, say a wall, so there is little or no electrons around that wall, could we essentially walk through it? would it just dissentegrate?

where is it?

.09 damn. your right, my bad. must have missed that 0. thanks. as for the 3 year old thing, i just saw it at the top so i gave it a try.

what about electrons, when moving, i understand that they seem "jump" in and out of space. could it be that they accelerate temporarily past the speed of light making it unseen for a second, then slow down again. i wonder what would make them do that. maybe they have something orbiting them themselves.

wouldnt it be 1,-1=1,-1. not 1=1,-1. if a and b are the same thing, then they are, just we dont know what set they are. could be negatives, could be positives. p.s. how do you guys write real math on here? nothing like that is on my keyboard. thanks.