cameron marical

he. i was fooled by it myself. i got it all up to that, why wouldnt they be traveling at the same speeds no matter what direction they whent? how does east and west change their speeds? ya the guy going against the earths rotation would seem to go faster, but like you said, the earths not an inertial referance frame.{im not trying to challenge you, i know im wrong, i just dont know why.}

it sounds to me like something that could be considered to be like this antigravity could be the end of a wormhole. it brings things out of what seems to be nothing. like antigravity would do. except not bringing things out, just kind of bending space in the opposite direction. it couldnt have mass then, could it?

nice.

does anybody know the extra 7 other dimensions proposed by the superstring theory?

wouldnt it be 0.3? {as the square root of nine} wouldnt that mean the square root of 10 is 1?

ya, its called the hafele-keating experiment. a couple atomic clocks and 2 commercial jet flights around the world twice. then compared with the u.s clocks naval observatorie. it worked too. like nanoseconds of pure relativity prediction. dang it! you must have posted right before mine inow. blast.

is it possible that the mass of an object bending space supplie the energy used in gravity? maybe the constant force against it is doing something like knocking electrons off of it wich in turn fuel the energy needs for gravity? just a guess.

still working on that one...

sorry about the misspelling. wont happen again. i understand the need for algrebra and the others before calculus. i meant something that teaches it from algebra up, to calculus.

hey, im probably one of the first ones to say that im totally against mumbo jumbo crap, and i have a very scientific based mind. so i was wondering if anyone knows about any experements actually trying to varify the existence of god, or the explanation of how karma could work? im actually thinking about doing some myself right now if no one has. i mean, im not spiritual or anything like that, but i do notice many things that suggest the existence of karma, or god in some way, wich could be coincidenses, but the odds are high. so, id like to have an already done opinion free test. like, back in middle school, i remember running away, well, prior to that it was stormy and snow up to our waists, stopping the trip, but we went anyways. needless to say we had to turn back, and once back home, the sun came out all of the sudden, birds chirping and all that. or when i have a good question, alot of times, its answered by something totally abstract, like a comercial or something. or whenever i do something bad in my book it really does always seem to come back and bite me, accordingly.and same thing flipped over, when i do something good, i get rewarded in some way, like i win or do really good in a meet or something. {im a swimmer} coincidence? and i know its really selfish to suggest that some higher being did this for me, but im just writing some data already been personally recorded, and looking at possible answers. what does anyone else think? any one agree or think im just scyzophrinic?

hey, im a freshman in highschool, so im barely educated in too much complex math, but i want to learn it all{ i know, big statement}. im in an algebra 1 class right now. any good book suggestions teaching this to calculas math? or anything higher than calculas? thanks.

are you sure there? maybe nothing weve come across, but it seems that all the data other than the amount directly containing what weve tooken from space regarding this idea seems to suggest there should be. maybe its just undetectable so far.

id probably say the library would truly be your best bet. at least for me it seems to be. i find it really hard to pay alot of attention when trying to learn things online, im also in high school{freshman} and i like to learn as much as i can about these things. library has good stuff. im going tomorrow to try and learn some higher math courses in fact.

just for a pendulum, because theres different gravity farther up or lower down. not for things like atomic clocks, or us.{timewise, though im sure different gravity would change your body, but not the same way as the twins paradox}

teleportation, yes. i came up with a similar theoretical design for this. but, really, unless you destroy the original copy, its cloning. but destroying the original copy is bad. its not transporting, its copy and pasting. still a good idea though. probably what theyll use to clone in the future, or something similiar. {if they do}

i think that the box is moving, and of course their in it, but their seperate referance frames in the box themselves also, so the light can move at normal predicted speeds because their referance frames are not directly traveling at the speed of light, the box their in is.

there is no proof of either and no nay-say proof of either. no ones right, no ones wrong. yet.

why not? it may seem more simpleminded and easy to do that, more art than thought, but thats still engineering. engineering is making things right?, so, why would that not be considered engineering? and architectual engineering is more than just drawing on a peice of paper anyways...

in all the diagrams ive seen with photons involved, it shows that photons are spherical shapes, is this just because of the fact that thats the easiest way to show it?, or are they really like that? if so, then why? photons have no mass, right? wrong? either way, i dont think that theyed come out spherical, theyed just be whatever wouldnt they? nothing pushing against them, like bubbles, is there? or maybe the speed that there going would stretch them out in a sense, so there more cyndrical. any one know?

oh really.

well, if any one is familiar with the show the big bang theory, the bigining song is great for this. its called the big bang theory by the bare naked ladies. another great "sciency" artist is tim minchin. hes an english comedy singer who has some great scientific rants. its awsome. {not recomended for religious fanatics}

either way, 200 hiroshimas would screw us up.

ouch. well, i cant support that, because i am interested. i just found this post. first of all. i think that the whole digital physics veiw is pretty interesting, and pretty viable too. but, in a universe like ours, anything is possible. the concept of reality is very interesting indeed.

one dimensiononal objects. dots. you can add them together all you want. just take some dots on a paper and add new ones in. connect the dots, and what do you get. the highest its going to get is 3 dimensional.{though i know, it would only be 2d if on your paper} what what.

so, this may be really wrong, but, do electrons make up a magnetic feild, or photons? whatever it is, does it ionize particles, and thats why things are attracted?