cameron marical

when i said sattelite, i meant whatever the cable would be attached to that is in space. like the space elavator. Merged post follows: Consecutive posts mergedand again, wouldnt it just fall out of space and come crashing down to earth?

klaynos, how did you come up with those answers?

well, ouch.

could you have something like a fan, wich the propellers were connected to small generators, and theres also mini windmills on the blow-side wich take in energy from there too. would it make more than it used? it uses 2 energy supplies to make it, the mechanical energy of the fan blades moving, and the wind energy from the moving air. i think it might help if it was all in an airtight "shell" too. and if it could work then it could also be used in bigger curcamstances.

thanks man ill get to work.

have you tried sleeping at someone elses? or at a hotel? just to see if its something other than an external person. maybe stay at a freinds and have them stay up and watch or something.

or you can do somthing on biodynamic ecosystems, theyre interesting to me, they might be cool for you too. good luck man.

oh ok. cool cool. thanks man.

ohh.:doh:my bad

really? thats pretty cool. what is this metamaterial made of? do you know?

oh, then how do we actually move our arms and legs? its not like we have small motors in our joints.

if i were to launch a rocket out my backyard when would it have to be if it was to get to the moon. i know it would blast me and my neghborhood to bits:doh: but i just want an equation and an answer. lets say i live in new york. the rocket goes 17,000 mph, straight, no stoping till the moon. it has just enough fuel to reach the moon. it weighed 1.5 tons. (if that matters) please, if you can, i want an equation with the answer so i can play with this for a while. and if im missing anything about the imagenary rocket or setup, just make something up and list it. thanks, if your cool enough to do it.

oh ok. so our movements are pretty much just twitches caused by electricity?

f1=3mph power1=(3mph*20m)/10 min so power1=6something. f2=4mph power2=(3mph+4mph)*20min/10min so power2=14something d1=20m t1=10min

ya, im gonna have to agree with padren on that i consider immortality as an unending continuity of consciousness. but i do understand the idea of what your saying. but to tell you the truth, id prefer some form of immortality as something way cooler, like us downloading our conscioussness's into robots wich then become our bodys. or becoming a vampire.

active potential, way cool. where does this all happen at?

i know right, what made the energy that made us?

wouldnt just one small tug on this cable send the satellite crashing down back to earth?

i believe in some form of god. i definitely beleive in some form of karma. who knows, maybe with the creation of life on earth through eveloution and the right ingrediants came another "being" thats just not on our radar somehow, and just happens to be everywhere, so [{he/she} dont want to say it}] is kind of "all knowing". anyways, i am a scientific person and i think that through the evidence of just my experinces have close to proven that theres some form of karma for me at least. im not getting all spiritual or hippi either.

i like that idea.

ya, but this requires more energy to power the machines, and, like what swansont said, you then have to worry about that stuff wearing out. but i think that tech is actually that way to go rather than biodynamic ecosytems, even though it is a little less inventive and different than having a jungle as a spaceship. but i think that there should be algea of course, and some sort of replineshable food source too. and one super recycler that litterally recycles everything, so in a way, you kind of have a mechanicall biodynamic ecosystem.

no, i think it would be wise to build it in space rather than on earth, instead you could use multiple trips and keep the equipment at somewhere like the iss and when you get all the supplys in space you can make it. it might be harder, but take a lot less energy and be less harmfull. ive heard of ideas for achiving propulsion through nuclear fission in space too, the Fusion Ramjet. it works by "scooping" in hydrogen from deep space and uses that and the fission process to accelerate. but is hydrogen really just in space occasionally? other than radiation and a tiny amount of elements caused by meteors and others, i thought that space is pretty much just a vaccum, and you need to mosly rely on inner sources to accelerate{unless your in a meteor shower, wich i strongly dont recomend, or near a star, wich arent really near here, other than our own.

oh, and its artificially intelligent and has a british humor.

oh, okay, i was wondering how people got 42, like of the hitchhikers guide to the galaxy. but, how are they applicable to the real world? im not really much of a mathmetician, engineering is more my kind of thing. and physics. oh, ok, i do now see the problem. whats your best guess, Mr. The Tree?

oh, could this charge-parity be used in something like this?