yahya515

every system like the planets around the sun will result in centripetal force towards the centre, due to the combination of both the rotation around the centre and the rotation around the axis , in the planets we have extra centripetal force in addition to the gravitational force between the planet and the sun, the force is inversely proportional to the radius of the rotation ®, let say the mass is (m) the linear velocity around the sun is (V) the velocity around the axis is (v), then the force F will be: F= ( m*v*V)/r for the earth : F= (5.9e24*30000*465.1)/149e9 = 5.5e20 newtons the gravitational force is 3.51 e22 newtons , the force due to motion is : F=mv^2/r = 3.56 e22 adding my force to the gravitional force will be: 5.5e20 + 3.51e22 = 3.56 e22 newtons !! so the force coming from my effect + the gravitional force = the force due to the motion (mv^2/r) I have tried an experiment with a ball hang by string the other side of the string is fixed to a rotating motor, when the motor moves the string moves around to move the ball in a rotaional motion , when moving the ball a round at a particular radius the system will have a centripetal force!! i.e the ball will rotate around its axis and around the radius continuously. the force is coming from the combination of the two spinning motions the one around the axis and the one around the circle, as a rsult that there is not work done for this force , i.e the radius is always constant , the force acting towards the centre without making any work , as a result of that the system creates the centripetal force without an external work done that why I call it self-consistent centripetal force.

I apologise , I understood you saying "you will take your chances" as neglecting religion and see how God will do with you then. it does not need from you to take chances, the justice definition has been announced by God, and who represents law is God himself.

how that is difficult ?! for me to avoid taking risk I may walk in streets naked carrying a big cross !! or perhaps traveling to isreal the promise land and live there in great fear !! or even make a dirty big beard!! all these people who do these things are afraid of and avoiding taking risks, you see them carrying crosses , being persecuted for being jewish , and you say they are fool !! yes they make themselves be fool to avoid taking risk.

how is he composite of real people who existed ? who are those people ? what is the connection between them? how they met ? if he was made up , who made him up ? why ? what is mentality of that inventor ? was he a writter ? a philosopher? an inventor? why this person who made him up did not refer all this glory to himself? how others accepted this invented stroy? many questions refer to lack of knowledge, in this time you beg the answer!!

it depends on the definition of justice and who represents it, for the judge there is someone who is higher than the judge, who will punish him , for God there is not anyone who is higher than God to punish him.

saying this exact last word for the judge will be enough to send you to prison, it is not enough to just be good also to respect the judge who represent law.

I think the reason is not they do not want to shock us instead their nature is different, they can not communicate with us , they are higher than us, because they are from a different universe they are different, the only way is to travel to them in their universe and see them , while our nature is different from that universe we should first die to be created again to be capable to meet them in their universe, the entities are angels , their King is God.

death is not the future , it is the end of the future, death is not part of life, it is the end of life, the life which is beautiful and good will not last forever , there are two bad posibilities whether you die and you do not come back again which is bad or you die and wake up in afterlife to be punished, I am surprised of the idea of being content !! for a human who will die and will not come back again, have not you ever dreamt of afterlife ? suppose it is not true , it is not logical I think you have been fooled a lot by someone who told you for example : if you buy this candy it has a lottery to win a million dollars, or going that way will lead you to pretty girls, no one will never prove that religion is completely wrong , so live the dream of a perfect afterlife and enjoy life being continous forever , I would like also to comment about that religion prevent us from living , that is wrong , feeling the hope of afterlife is great.

for this example look quickly to see the beauty with some caution. this is real life and not pure one.

Life is not just beauty.a very Pessimistic person is wrong and a very Optimistic person is also wrong.

I quote " A lucid dream is any dream in which one is aware that one is dreaming " it is a kind of dream called lucid dream. so not all dreams are lucid including nightmares, I quote " hence there is an increased amount of activity in the parietal lobes making lucid dreaming a conscious process" lucid dream is a conscious process. it is far from the unconscious process of sleeping. I quote " Skeptics of the phenomenon suggest that it is not a state of sleep" so you are refering to something controversial.

are you serious ? can you avoid nightmares ? I can at some extent avoid being hit by a car .

Excuse me !! night dreams !! the time when you are sleeping , similar to a diferent life that you can not control. the similarity also that sleeping is similar to death, you are away from reality, living another life i.e , night dreams.

you can not control your dream, however you can control life, is the thing which is capale to be controled will come first or will come later ? dream can not be controled , reality can be controled, life can be controled , afterlife can not be controled, you first live reality then dream about it , you first live life and then be judged about it, you are always wise Mike. you first investigate yourself being blind then investigate if the wall is invisible or not, if you are blind then the wall being invisible or not is meaningless , just follow that person who is not blind and thinks the wall is invisible, if you are not blind determine by yourself whether the wall is invisible or not, it is easier to investigate whether a person is blind or not about his beliefs, if you think yourself being blind , by not being able to see beyond death, then follow others blindly, if you are not blind by being able to see beyond death , then determine whether afterlife is true or false.

if it does I may go to hell!! imagine that you are blind , this will prevent you living normally, you do not have the choise to avoid being blind or perhaps being disabled, you are content being blind you will not enter paradise by being blind, but you are content , now being blind came from another authority , you did not cause yourself being blind , life itself did , the same for religion it came from another authority , being blind is much much worse than being religious, why blind people are content and religious ones are not ? here comes the role of the devil . I will loose nothing , this life will end whether I enjoyed it or not, I will not remember any joy being dead.

how I will get knowledge of being and death ? what kind of science will provide me with such knowledge ? while I will not be able to obtain any kind of knowledge about death and afterlife from any other sources l prefer to believe in religion , also what if afterlife matters much more than the life we live now?

there is a huge difference between animals and humans in death matters , an animal does not know about its future death, it is content for it does not know , when a person knows about death , he develops ideas whether they are true or false, they are the same as ancient thoughts of spirit and where it will go after death , like ancient egypt ones, ancient does not mean it is obsolete however it means the beginning thouthgts about death for humankind . the natural thing is to have ideas about the spirits of the dead ,and specifically about afterlife and destiny , as a result of scientific ideas or theories the human kind had to remove any other ideas that seem not logical even if humans need them due to the unsolved problem of death and destiny , religion is a kind of development for those ancient ideas.

so do I , according to my belief people will sleep after they die and wake up on the judgement day.

crush it !!

this statement is not capable to determine its truth value, if it is false then its true, if it is true then its false, I imagine it as sitting in in front of a mirror , saying " I am Yahya" , and the mirror replies "I am not Yahya", so truth value can be taken individually, i.e whether you consider yourself is true and the mirror is lying or there is some exact problem , that it always gives the negation of reality , or the mirror is true and somehow you are mistaken in saying the phrase. however if you did not make any mistakes in saying the phrase, then the statement " I am yahya" is always true , we take it from a single direction, and neglecting what it is image in the mirror. suppose we would like to the determine the truth value of this phrase " this statement is false", we just put in between parentheses ( ), in between there is our phrase , if we think about it as false, then the thing between parentheses is always false, we do not care about it , so it is not a statement, the statement refers to the word , "this ", which is not logical , imagine the statement is , "I am false" here the phrase itself made the decision of determining its truth value, it will directly be false, also "I am the statement which is false"however the word "this", makes the decision of making it true or false is up to the reader of this phrase, so the phrase says it is up to you I am meaningless , if you decide I am true then I am true , If you decide I am false then I am false , so it is not a statement , so this phrase has two possible truth values, if it is false , then thing between parentheses is always false , the negation of it is true, what is negation of " this statement is false "? it is " this statement is true" so this last statement is true and we stop there, however if the original statement is true , then the thing between parentheses is always true, its negation is false , which is this statement " this statement is true"

it is the same as standing in front of a mirror and you say" I am saying the truth" , and the mirror replies " I am saying the untruth", the statement is like a mirror, you say about it false it replies " I am true" you say it is true , the statement replies " I am false" so you are true and the mirror or the statement is false, when you say the statement is false then it is false do not care a bout it , it is just an imaginary mirror, right. I mean the statement is lying

nobody knows what death is , only dead people know that and they can not tell us, however here a philosophical method to know that: we know how death looks like and how life looks like, dead people do not talk, they do not move they do not eat etc. also we know what life is , the opposite of above, the golden key is to know what death is and also what life is to know the changing moment i.e the moment when a person change from the state of being alive to the state of being dead, and this moment is between , this moment everyone who is alive knows about it, it is the time when you are close to death and do not die, for example , having a car accident , there are some possibility for that: you have a car accident, you break your leg you suffer some pain and you are save. or have more damage to your body you suffer more pain and also you are safe. you have a severe injury you suffer a lot of pain and you loose consciousness at this time you are in the state which is similar to death , you will die only if your heart stops, when your heart stops you will not feel that because you are conscious, to prove that in medical operations , a doctor , may cut out part of your body including your heart without you feeling pain. conclusion : death is a state of loosing consciousness permanently whether by suffering pain , when you die while you are conscious or not suffering pain when are unconscious. below is my graph of time vs how much changes occur graph, it starts from point o which is beginning of life it continues to point a which the point of losing consciousness, the vertical line is how much changes occurred in your life, the horizontal line is time, from point o to point a is life and from point a and beyond is death no changes occur there .

science does not deal with truth, it deals with things that seem true, that what make science be science, if it defines truth this defintion will make science itself unvalid, because science according to the definition of truth , the current one, and I think science will not have a defintion more different than the current defintion, science will be unvalid, because science is not true, science seems true but it isn't, so if science defines truth and according to its defintion , science itself is considered to be untrue, it is like someone killing himself, and science will not kill itself , it is better to seek a religious defintion, or a moral one or even a philosiphical one, I think science does not accept the concept truth at all, and who makes science , they are people enjoy themselves , by observing and predicting , they do not want things to be easy , to be divided into true and untrue . things should have thier truth level. can we have a measurement for truth ? a level for truth, this concept is used in science , theories are half true , until another scientist change it to be of zero truth. so science uses the word truth in a very different way.

you tell me , what do you think about calculus failing to determine the instantanous velocity of an stationary object, while it is equal to zero, if you do not have an answer then your model fails, talking about scientists are great and doing hard work, and yahya uses a lot of philosophy and lack knowledge will not change the fact and will not help, attacking others will help only yourself , because it will give you an imaginary victory and imaginary feeling of changing the fact. great!!

OK, I understand. and I apologise. I did not overthrow anything, and I did not make any step in that, so it is a direct personal attack. and I think the reason is the post above about that calculus fails to determine the slope of a vertical line to PREDICT the instantanous velocity for an object at stationary