iRock

1 acre of grassland soak 2300 lbs Co2 per year . Tree soak 1 lbs Co2 is for " Example " , for easy & faster to explain . Sorry

To build a building on an area which grow grass , bush , tree we have to destroy the plants . After finishing , we never replant the same kind of these destroyed plants at others places . In reality , the environmental standard , LEED current version of all the countries on the world never force us to grow these plants again at others places . We can get LEED certificate of Green Buildings , ISO 14000 - Environmental Management certificate or meet US EPA environmental standards even we never replant destroyed plants . Our environmental standards were wrong , only focus on air , water , energy & forget destroyed plants . People need to know this issue . If we look at 1 top view image of a city , that is a set of errors , which each building , house , supermarket , police station , ......... is a sign of error of lost ecosystem which have CO2 sequestration ability . This error decrease legally CO2 sequestration ability of Earth . Urban planners don't know lost ecosystems . Every city , house , building got this problem . This is a hugest problem that we ever know . Example : to build a build we have to destroy 100 trees which can absorb 100 lbs CO2 , if we don't replant 100 trees , we lost 100 trees & we decrease CO2 sequestration ability of our country 100lbs We need a policy for destroyed plants to make Co2 sequestration of Earth bigger than CO2 emission , after soak all CO2 at Earth , it begin to soak CO2 of atmosphere . If we solve this issue globally by planting destroyed plants , may be we can solve Climate Change , pls sign it . If people & governemtns deserve to know this issue , pls sign it : https://www.change.org/p/new-york-times-stop-serious-wrong-environmental-standard Thank you .

I'm back for a petition : I found a global environmental problem: To build a building on an area which grow grass , bush , tree we have to destroy the plants . After finishing , we never replant the same kind of these destroyed plants at others places . In reality , the environmental standard , LEED current version of all the countries on the world never force us to grow these plants again at others places . We can get LEED certificate of Green Buildings , ISO 14000 - Environmental Management certificate or meet US EPA environmental standards even we never replant destroyed plants . Our environmental standards were wrong , only focus on air , water , energy & forget destroyed plants . People need to know this issue . If we solve this issue globally by planting destroyed plants , may be we can solve Climate Change , pls sign to stop this issue . How bad the wrong environmental standards damage our countries : Climate Change is attacking our countries ( snow storm ? ) , action pls . Pls sign & share: https://www.change.org/p/tom-harris-stop-serious-wrong-environmental-standard

Thank you for told me about : Abstract . Abstract : Do we protect environment good or not ? Example we design our city with 90% area is plants and 10% area is buildings . Is it correct 100% ?No , it’s not correct . Example before we build constructions , the area which wild plants , trees absorb 1 million lbs CO2 , and then we build some buildings , the area which trees , grassland only absorb 900 000 lbs CO2 . So we damage environment , we lost 100 000 lbs CO2 should absorbed by trees , plants , right ? And our environmental law allow that , or legislator , environmental scientists absolutely don’t have knowledge about conservation of absorbing CO2 , creating O2 , absorb water in urban design , ……. And in Climate Change , it’s really not good , when environment which we restore absorb less CO2 than environment of the past , right ? Scientist need to know about this problem . Do we build our cities , towns without comparing value of absorbing CO2 , before and after we build city , town …. 100% around the world ? Yes . Is that a global serious errors of design , yes . All the scientific forum I posted my topic , they're all biology expert , physics expert , ...... but all of them almost silent when read my topic, no one can confirm I was wrong . There is a hope : : MIT ClimateCoLab , James Greyson - Climate Rescue , both follow me : https://twitter.com/HuynhPhuDat http://www.climatecolab.org/web/guest/plans/-/plans/contestId/1300210 . Thank you for some questions members here ask me , it make my project better . Thank you !!!

The abstract of this topic : show people problem of urban design or any name of this problem . Because when we learn about environment at university , perhap no one teach us about calculate how much CO2 is absorbed before we build a building and after we build a building , is it equal or not , and what will happen if CO2 is absorbed smaller than the past . ANd this topic is also show people even a building with green standard can have a problem . Thank you .

Before I post my topic on this forum , I have some topics with same info on some others forums : http://www.scienceagogo.com/forum/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Number=50828&page=2 http://www.climate-debate.com/forum/report-climate-change-and-global-serious-errors-of-designing-technology--d6-e283.php http://philosophychatforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=26468 3 environmental sub-forums add 2 forums which delete my topic add this forums = 6 scientific forum . http://www.thescienceforum.com/ , this forum is protected by blocked software , even I use best hide IP software , I couldn’t join this forum to warn members here . I try my best , I don’t have a lot of choice . “The best you could hope for currently, is to write a "letter to the editor" of some magazines, and even newspapers; and hope somebody will print your information, observations, and recommendations. And making it short and easy-to-understand is key to getting anything accepted for general publication. You might do best by just copying quotes from other sources, that also see the same solutions, and then arrange them into a short and simple thesis “ My friend , no one talk about this problem before . So how can I find any quote ? I’m HELPLESS . http://philosophychatforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=26468 is the last topic about this problem . I will finish it in the future . After that , I will finish some important things . God give me conscience and I tried . Human and their governments , even they know or don’t know about this problem is not my problem anymore . Conscience make me feel really bad , if I can’t suffering anymore , the last chance is suicide . Very simple . Everyday I think about it .

With all Will all of my respect , that forum - Envirolink.org - delete both of my acc and my topic , Johnny Electriglide . I need someone help me with the manuscript , I'm just a poor man try my best to make my consience can feel better . I'm still have a long post will coming .

If someone help me edit this manuscript better , teach me about manuscript ( he / she become a co author of this manuscript too ) than I send to a scientific magazine , than they publish it . Reporters read article Climate Change and Global serious Errors of Design , than they go to US EPA , ask the representations of US EPA and they can ask all US EPA employees about the problem in the article , all of them can not comment anything . US EPA’s prestige is down . But reporters and communications systems will not focus on US EPA only , next target is all US government’s buildings . And communication systems focus on all governement and their buildings around the world . If government don’t fix the errors of the buildings , they can stop tell us protect the environment . Law maker will have to fix the problem in law system . You help me , you will become famous because it’s a world scandal , the biggest scandal in human history . Do you disagree with me ? Or US EPA and US don’t fix the problem so they face vox populi ? Can they ? And other governments too , can they face vox populi of their countries ? I think they can’t . Law system of the world must change , that is a history . I need 1 person help me , hep the world when all of you understand the problem clearly . But if all government , and all school , universities can face vox populi and don’t plant trees , plants at somewhere for their buildings , and all law maker don’t fix the problem of the protecting environment law , they can stop teach people protect the environment if they have shame . If they don’t have shame can continue teach people protect environment , people will smile into their face . If a magazine use this manuscript , publish it , I finish my wish , tell people the risk of environmental law , ........ . My consicence can relaxed because I tell people the risk . Time to talk about money . About University of Texas at Dallas , first academic building in Texas to receive LEED Platinum status. This is the area of University of Texas at Dallas : The wild grass area = 14.6 acres can absorb 58152712 kg CO2 * 2.2 = 127935966.4 lbs O2 . 1 tree absorb average 45 lbs CO2 per year so to restore the environment , we need : : 127935966 / 45 = 2843021 trees . To much trees , right ? But according to http://www.everything71.com/2012/02/10-type-of-trees-most-carbon-dioxide.html 10 type of trees : 1. Trembesi (Samanea saman) : Carbon dioxide is absorbed reaches 28.488,39 kg/year. 2. Bamboo (Bambuseae) : Carbon dioxide that absorbed by bamboo still do not know for sure, but it is estimated 14 tons/year. 3. Cassia (Cassia sp) : Carbon dioxide is absorbed reaches 5.295,47 kg/year. 4. Cananga/Kenanga (Canangium odoratum) : Carbon dioxide is absorbed reaches 756,59 kg/year. 5. Pingku (Dysoxylum excelsum) : Carbon dioxide is absorbed reaches 720,49 kg/year. 6. Banyan/Beringin (Ficus benyamina) : Carbon dioxide is absorbed reaches 535,90 kg/year. 7. Krey Payung (Fellicium decipiens) : Carbon dioxide is absorbed reaches 404,83 kg/year. 8. Matoa (Pometia pinnata) : Carbon dioxide is absorbed reaches 329,76 kg/year. 9. Mahogany (Swettiana mahagoni) : Carbon dioxide is absorbed reaches 295,73 kg/year. 10. Saga (Adenanthera pavonina) : Carbon dioxide is absorbed reaches 221,18 kg/year. Trembesi Wiki : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albizia_saman If University of Texas want to restore the environment and we use Trembesi to absorb CO2 : 58152712 kg CO2 / 28488 = 2042 Trembesi trees . University of Texas at Dallas : http://www.utdallas.edu/news/2011/9/20-12831_Nearly-33-of-UT-Dallas-Students-Are-New-to-Campus_article.html If plant 1 trees need 5 USD so plant 2042 trees need 5 * 2042 = 10210 USD . UTD has 19000 students , if all student and all emplyees of UTD donate 1 USD per , we can have 4084 Trembesi trees easily . And every year , all people donate 1 USD is enough to take care 4084 Trembesi trees ( We make a better environment when we make environment absorb more CO2 than the past , perhaps ) NOAA Center for Weather and Climate Prediction : Absorb 415200 lbs CO2 = 188727 lbs CO2 . We use Trembesi : 188727 lbs CO2 / 28488 lbs CO2 = 6 trees NOAA CWCP have 800 employees so all 800 employees of NOAA CWCP should plant 800 trees for a better environment . Dear God , please let 1 person here give me a little help . I wait too long . Just 1 manuscript about conservation of absorb CO2 , create O2 .

Thank you for your work , Essay . For me , you're a good teacher even you never teach at a school . Thank you again , my friend and teacher . :-) Let see some examples : This is Google Earth image of United States Environmental Protection Agency Region 4 Science and Ecosystem Support Division , 980 College Station Road Athens, Georgia 30605-2720 (SESD ). Left picture use Google data , date 1993 . Right picture , date 2012 Total facility area : 66,201 gross square feet ( GSF ) . To build United States Environmental Protection Agency Region 4 Science and Ecosystem Support Division need 66,201 gross square feet of forest .I use Google and with dense density of forest here , I estimate 1 acre tree here have 300 trees per acre . 1 acre = 43560 square feet . So 66201 gross square feet / 43560 = 1.5 so in the past here we had : 300* 1.5 = 450 trees . "A single mature tree can absorb carbon dioxide at a rate of 48 lbs per year- McAliney, Mike. Arguments for Land Conservation: Documentation and Information Sources for Land Resources Protection, Trust for Public Land, Sacramento, CA, December, 1993 On average, one tree produces nearly 260 pounds of oxygen each year. Two mature trees can provide enough oxygen for a family of four. Environment Canada, Canada's national environmental agency So in 1 year 450 trees of 66,201 gross square feet can absorb CO2 : 48 * 450 = 21600 lbs CO2 . In 1 year 450 trees here create O2 : 260 * 450 = 117000 lbs O2 . According to United States Environmental Protection Agency ‘s website , http://www.epa.gov/region4/sesd/sesd.html http://www.epa.gov/region4/sesd/about.html http://www.epa.gov/oaintrnt/facilities/athens-sesd.htm And 2011 report of US EPA : http://www.epa.gov/region4/ej/Jacksonville_EJ_FINAL.pdf United States Environmental Protection Agency doesn’t have a plan to re - plant 450 trees for overcome the environmental damage here in Climate Change . If we think about conservation of absorbing CO2 , and creating O2 , Earth today lost : 21600 lbs CO2 of absorbing and 117000 lbs of creating in Climate Change age , when we really need to increase absorbing CO2 of plants . Or Earth today absorb CO2 smaller than Earth of the past 21600 lbs CO2 and creating O2 smaller Earth of the past 117000 lbs CO2 because of United States Environmental Protection Agency Region 4 Science and Ecosystem Support Division , 980 College Station Road Athens, Georgia 30605-2720 (SESD ). This is a parking area at United States Environmental Protection Agency Region 5 , Cleveland Office , 25089 Center Ridge Road Westlake , OH 44145 – 4170 , USA . Date of left picture is 1994 , right is 2014 I use Google Earth measure the areaand have a result : 108900 gross square feet . To increase the size of parking area , US destroy a 108900 square feet of forest . Forest here has a dense density so I choose 1 acre have 300 trees so 108900 square feet have : 108900 / 43560 = 2.5 so total trees here in 1994 is 750 trees . So in 1 year 750 trees 108900 square feetcan absorb CO2 : 48 * 750 = 36000 lbs CO2 . In 1 year 450 trees here create O2 : 260 * 750 = 195000 lbs O2 . According to United States Environmental Protection Agency’s website : http://www2.epa.gov/aboutepa/epa-region-5 US EPA Region 5 , Cleveland Office don’t have a plan to re – create 750 trees after they destroy environment of this area to build the parking area . So about conservation of CO2 and O2 , the 2014 Earth absorb CO2 less than the Earth 1994 36000 lbs CO2 and the 2014 Earth create O2 less than the Earth 1994 195000 lbs O2 because of parking area at United States Environmental Protection Agency Region 5 , Cleveland Office , 25089 Center Ridge Road Westlake , OH 44145 – 4170 , USA . Because I only can choose what Google Earth have and the historical image of Google Earth only can move to the past 1994 , if I can move farer , I can prove the whole truth United States Environmental Protection Agency Region 5 , Cleveland Office , 25089 Center Ridge Road Westlake , OH 44145 – 4170 , USA Green building – LEED green standard are followed by Argentina Green Building Council , Green Building Council of Australia , Green Building Council Brasil , Peru Green Building Council , Canada Green Building Council Dutch Green Building Council , Emirates Green Building Council , France Green Building Council , German Sustainable Building Council , Indian Green Building Council Italy Green Building Council , Japan Green Building Consortium , Korea Green Building Council , Mexico Green Building Council New Zealand Green Building Council , Green Building Council of South Africa ,Sweden Green Building Council , Taiwan Green Building Council , Romania Green Building Council , United Kingdom Green Building , Council U.S. Green Building Council Vietnam Green Building Council and World Green Building Council , all are correct if we focus on conservation all environmental index ? Because all Climate summit focus on how can we decrease high CO2 level of atmosphere so on this article , we only analyzing absorbing CO2 value , creating O2 value of the environment of the past and the present of some buildings . I will analyze this green standard is good or not . According to Wikipedia and US Green Building Council : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leadership_in_Energy_and_Environmental_Design http://www.usgbc.org/articles/qa-university-texas-dallas-vice-president-business-affairs-discusses-innovation-green-build I will analyze University of Texas at Dallas , first academic building in Texas to receive LEED Platinum status. This is the area of University of Texas at Dallas : I use Google Earth , date of image on the left : 2001 , date on the right : 2013 . The wild grass area = 14.6 acres . Mature grasslands sequester 2400 - 3600 lbsCO2 per acre each year – Technical Assessment of the Carbon Sequestration Potential of Managed Turfgrass in the United State ,Dr . RanajitSahu , 2008 at the request of the Outdoor Power Equipment Institute . It is estimated that a 50 by 50 foot lawn (2,500 square feet), releases enough oxygen for a family of four, while absorbing carbon dioxide, hydrogen fluoride and perosyacetyle nitrate This means that one square foot of grass will produce approximately half a kilogram of oxygen a day . I choose this type of grassland absorb lowest CO2 value : 2400 lbs CO2 per year . Because wild grass doesn’t cover 100 % percent of this area and I estimate 50 % percent of this area in 2001 cover by wild grass so In 1 year 14.6 acres with 50% cover by wild grass absorb : 14.6 * 2400 * 50% = 17520 lbs CO2 per year . In 1 year 14.6 acres with 50% cover by wild grass create : 43560 * 0.5 * 14.6 * 365 * 50% = 58152712 kg O2 . 1 kg = 2.2 lbs so 58152712 kg O2 * 2.2 = 127935966.4 lbs O2 . University of Texas at Dallas doesn’t have a plan to re –create palnts can absorb 17520 lbs CO2 and create 58152712 lbs O2 . Because of University of Texas at Dallas - LEED Platinum certificate , Earth today lost 17520 lbs of absorbing CO2 , 58152712 lbs O2 of creating O2 . We build a lot of roads . And a road go through a wild grass area , bush trees , a forests , …. Roads decrease of absorbing CO2 , water , creating O2 value of wild grass area , forest , …… of all countries . And all countries don’t have conservative rule to re – create plants in replace for all plants area turn into roads area . Have you ever see airport ? A really large area without plants . If we destroy all plants for airport’s area to build airport . We should find a empty place , and plant any kind plants , to make it replace absorbing CO2 , water , creating O2 value = value of absorbing CO2 , water , creating O2 of the airport’s environment ( plants) in the past . Even your city , town design with 70 % for plants and 30 % for building , house , it's not correct because conservation of CO2 , O2 , water need more 30 % of plants and this area of plants must absorb CO2 , water , create O2 value at least equal with absorb CO2 , water , create O2 value of 30 % of the past . Before I write this article , none of any architecture know about conservation of CO2 , O2 even they design our city , town , ……. world thousand years ago . So the design problems of conservation of CO2 , O appear some thousand years ago . According to Wiki : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Green_building Reducing environmental impact : Green building practices aim to reduce the environmental impact of building. The first rule is that the greenest building is the building that doesn't get built. Since construction almost always degrades a building site, not building at all is preferable to green building, in terms of reducing environmental impact. The second rule is that every building should be as small as possible. The third rule is not to contribute to sprawl, even if the most energy-efficient, environmentally sound methods are used in design and construction. Urban infill sites are preferable to suburban "greenfield" sites . The green building standard and our green standard have a serious mistake about conservation of CO2 , O2 because before people build the building , the area for a building usually have plants , trees , bush trees , wild grass , …. After we build the building , plants , trees , bush trees , wild grass , …. ( which absorb CO2 , water , create O2 ) replace by building ( which doesn’t absorb CO2 , water , create O2 ) . After we build the building , compare between the past and the present , the area of the building lost a value of absorbing CO2 , water and creating O2 . According to conservation of CO2 , O2 , water of the past , for the conservation of the Earth at the present , we must find another area doesn’t have plants , than plant trees or any kind of plants to restore the absorbing CO2 and creating O2 ( in replace for plants of the past of building’s area ) value for the present . Green building standard are followed by 19 countries around this world don’t force the owners of buildings re – create the environment of the past to re – archive absorbing CO2 value and creating O2 value after they build the building . All other protecting environmental definition , law systems don’t talk about conservation of absorbing CO2 , creating O2 : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sustainable_architecture http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Environmental_design http://green.wikia.com/wiki/LEED_Certification http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leadership_in_Energy_and_Environmental_Design International Environmental Law : https://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=132294 United States Environmental Protection : http://www2.epa.gov/laws-regulations Australia: Nabers / Green Star / BASIX (in NSW only) Brazil: AQUA / LEED Brasil Canada: LEED Canada / Green Globes / Built Green Canada China: GBAS Finland: PromisE France: HQE Germany: DGNB / CEPHEUS Hong Kong: BEAM Plus India: Indian Green Building Council (IGBC)/ GBCIndia (Green Building Construction India)/ GRIHA Indonesia: Green Building Council Indonesia (GBCI) / Greenship Italy: Protocollo Itaca / Green Building Council Italia Japan: CASBEE Jordan: Jordan Green Building Council Korea, Republic of: Green Building Certification Criteria / Korea Green Building Council Malaysia: GBI Malaysia Mexico: LEED Mexico Netherlands: BREEAM Netherlands New Zealand: Green Star NZ Pakistan: Pakistan Green Building Council Philippines: BERDE / Philippine Green Building Council Portugal: Lider A / SBToolPT® Qatar: Qatar Sustainability Assessment System (QSAS) Republic of China (Taiwan): Green Building Label Singapore: Green Mark South Africa: Green Star SA Spain: VERDE Switzerland: Minergie United States: LEED / Living Building Challenge / Green Globes / Build it Green / NAHB NGBS / International Green Construction Code (IGCC) / ENERGY STAR United Kingdom: BREEAM United Arab Emirates: Estidama Turkey : CEDBİK Thailand : TREES Vietnam: LOTUS Rating Tools Czech Republic: SBToolCZ The protecting environmental laws system , green standard help to decrease absorbing CO2 value and decrease creating O2 value of the Earth today . Our Earth have Global Serious Errors of Design . To all members of this forum can read this message , John Cuthber , Endy0816 , Ophiolite , imatfaal , ,...... ..... , all Journalists who are reading this topic : My name is Huynh Phu Dat , a graphic designer , a amateur scientist . When Climate Change’s disasters attacked my country 3 or 4 years ago and than I knew not only my country but a lot of countries have the same problem , I cried several times . Than I focus on Climate Change . I used to go to park and I ask myself why choose to many grassland areas but not plant as much trees as possible ? Than I focus on buildings and ask myself why after re –create the environment , the environment always worse if compare with environment with the past about CO2 , O , water . Than I have the fomular . In Climate Change , it’s a BURDEN of CONSCIENCE because if I know about the truth and can’t warn people , sin’s complex will follow me until I die . And even when I’m a soul , sin’s complex will never disappear if I can continue to see human kind decreasing CO2 but number of Climate Change ‘s disaster only increase & more direful . I need to warn 7 billions people and their goverments . I submit some manuscripts to Nature Climate , but they didn’t publish them . I think I have problem about language barrier and the way I explain about Global Serious Errors of design was not good and I don’t have a real scientific language like a scientist . If I re –create my manuscript to warn peole and send to Nature or any scientific magazine , can you help me ? Can you help me ? I really need help to warn people ? Just 1 manuscript . I don’t ask you for help with a conduct of a graphic designer or scientist , I ask you with a conduct of 1 human being ask others human being for help because all of you and me can feel the pain when your countries and mine , your citizens and mine are attacked by Climate Change’s disasters . I think all of you just want to stop Climate Change , and me too . I know a little about design and all of you have knowledge and scientific language . Can some members here help me with my warning manuscript ? I need someone teach me or work with me , if you work with me with this manuscript , you are co – author of this manuscript . Thank you . p/s : about plants : many scientists and civil engineers, they all think that any carbon absorbed by the biosphere is just recycled back into the atmosphere within the next year or so ...as that biomass dies and decomposes into methane or carbon dioxide and water. If you think that , I think you're bad at protecting environment . It’s just make me think that all these people protect environment really bad at effect or they’re not at effective at all . If plant 100 trees and 1 tree die after 1 or 2 years or even 10 tens trees die , yes I can accept that but with all 100 trees die or here all scientists and civil engineers think 100 % percent tree die . so fire all people work to keep trees , plants alive when they can’t do their work good , actually , if 30 % plants die is enough to consider about the effect of their work . If we earn money by keeping trees , plants alive , we only can continue our work and earn money if we can keep them alive . Plants have many different type , some are good at against hot weather or cold weather , some can against bugs , some can absorb huge CO2 , value , we should choose the best in our opinions . All kind of plants some day will die . But more day they can live , more CO2 can be absorb . So if we plant more plants , and more plants only alive in 10 years , and in 10 years , it make absorbing CO2 of Earth bigger than emitting CO2 of Earth so that is 10 years we decrease CO2 of atmosphere . And ten years Earth’s weather become stable and 10 years less Climate Change ‘s disasters . Before they die or we should never let they die ( ^ ^ ) , they already absorb a lot of CO2 of atmosphere . And before they die , we have time for a next generation of plants will grow to continue absorb CO2 . And when the plants of this generation die , we need value of next generation plants bigger or can absorb bigger CO2 value than emitting CO2 value of dead plants of this generation . Considering about Earth of the past , perhaps the Climate is stable because even trees , plants still die everyday , but living trees are large enough to absorb all emitting CO2 of dead trees , plants .

I send you a manuscript , and at the end at final part of the manuscript , I confirm protecting environmental law systems , LEED , or any protecting definations help the word decreae absorbing CO2 and decrease creating O2 , base on the buildings , roads , .......... . Too bad if we know about conservation of CO2 , O2 . I read a lot environmental law systems and I understand that truth . Broken heart , really sad .

Wow , with a reply like that I think you have another keyboard , right ? And to many books to read , ....

Update Time The CO2 of atmosphere is increasing because of emitting CO2 value of cars , bus , human , …. Bigger than absorbing CO2 value of plants , lands , ocean , ……. Compare time : Decreasing CO2 solution until this solution can absorb CO2 of atmosphere : Here only Red go down Decreasing Co2 and increasing CO2 absorbing at the same time make the absorbing CO2 of atmosphere Process begin faster . When both Red move down and Green move up , the process will faster than just only Red go down – or we only choose decreasing CO2 . This is a present for my friend , Sam A . Mitchell - Essay . Happy Birthday !!!!

My name is Huynh Phu Dat , a graphic designer . This is an abstract about how to solve CO2 by a view of a amateur scientist : ( Please correct me if I was wrong ) ( Our forefathers , ancestors should know this truth thousand years ago , ..... sadly ) A Earth before human kind appear is fresh by large amount of plants around the Earth . Human appear( 1 ) . We change the Earth , build house , road , building , airport , stadium , ............ exploit wood ( 2 ) . And we , our cars , bus , plane , gas , oil .....create CO2 ( 3 ) . Here , just focus on O2 , CO2 , water of area : ( 1 ) This is a environment before human appear : Plants and roots . We mainly choose to build society near a place have water , rivers and that place will have plants . Or original Earth , original area have plants . Or original Earth , original area create O2 , absorbs CO2 / water . Than we build our society : ( 2 ) No plants , no roots . Ex : we use 100 square acres for a building , 50 acres for a building , 50 ACRES FOR GRASSLAND . 100 acres in the past have adult trees , wild grass . So if we restore the environment after build the building , we MUST MAKE 50 ACRES IN PRESENT ABSORB CO2 VALUE = CO2 ABSORBING VALUE OF 100 ACRES OF TREES + WILD GRASS IN THE PAST . It’s meant about value of CO2 , O2 , water , after human use this area , it’s doesn’t change . It’s equal between past and present . Human don’t decrease absorbing CO2 , water , creating O2 value of that area . If after human restore the 50 acres and absorbing CO2 / water , creating O2 value less than 100 acres of the past , so we must find another area and create plants that absorb CO2 / water , create O2 in supply for the absorbing CO2 / water, creating O2 that we need , want . CONSERVATION OF CO2 , WATER , O2 . Have you ever stand in front of a row of trees ,on the left are some skyscrapers , on the right is a road . Just imagine the environment in the past of area of all building’s size , the floor and the environment of the road . So the question is : The value of absorbing CO2/ water value , creating O2 value will equal with value of absorbing CO2 /water , creating O2 of the area of all skyscrapers ( left area ) add with the area of the row of trees in the past , what was here ( between ) add with value of absorbing CO2 , water , creating O2 of the environment of the road in the past ( right ) . Think about CONSERVATION OF CO2 , WATER , O2 . We build a lot of roads . And a road go through a wild grass area , bush trees , a forest . Roads decrease of absorbing CO2 , water , creating O2 value of wild grass area , forest , …… We don’t have a CONSERVATION OF CO2 , WATER , O2 . Have you ever see aairport ? No plants at landing field .If we destroy all plants for airport . We should find a empty place , and plant any kind plants , to make it replace absorbing CO2 , water , creating O2 value = value of absorbing CO2 , water , creating O2 of the airport’s environment ( plants )in the past . And many things more , ……… All the process is 100 % comparison of absorbing CO2 , water , creating O2 value of the past and the present , for CONSERVATION OF CO2 , WATER , O2 . All CONSERVATION OF CO2 , WATER , O2 of buildings , roads , house …. Add with CONSERVATION OF CO2 , WATER , O2 of forest we destroy , exploit for wood . CONSERVATION OF CO2 , WATER , O2 of buildings , roads , house , forests , ….. => CONSERVATION OF CO2 , WATER , O2 of town , city , state , ……. => CONSERVATION OF CO2 , WATER , O2 of country => CONSERVATION OF CO2 , WATER , O2 of Earth’s plants . After we have CONSERVATION OF CO2 , WATER , O2 of Earth’s plants . ( original Earth ) Add with : (3) We know cars , bus , ship , plane absorb O2 , create CO2 , CO2 of fossil fuel , gas , …….. So we must have area of plants for of absorbing CO2 , creating O2 if we don’t want CO2 from these things are our problem . The architecture don’t know about CONSERVATION OF CO2 , WATER , no one know it before . And no one can confirm land , soil in a city , town which under asphalt , rock , boardwalk , …. Will absorb , store CO2 equal with natural land , soil before we build city , town ( plants have root , root make land become good quality , and which asphalt , boardwalk , stone , brick above , no plant’s roots under it ) Just walk into town , city , university , museum , ...... , look around and calculate . Even your city , town design with 70 % for plants and 30 % for building , house , it's not correct . Even how large average plants size per each person you have , it's not base on CO2 , O2 , water . Plants have different type , some absorb a lot of CO2 , some are just for fun . So things are not simple .

I wish it just simple like your comment . Please give me some day because today I'm working with graphic detail .

I will need a little time because it will need some graphic jobs . " If you are a foreign citizen and you do know what you are talking about then feel free. I just don't approve of people railing against my country without having all or even most of the facts." You know , I live in Vietnam , even if I bring a story about a building , not 1 building but a lot , about CO2 pollution of people everyday go there by car and the plants in front of the building , tell scientists in Vietnam . They will tell me " crazy , stupid " even Vietnam have a lot of Climate Change's disaster . The story about the building I can post on architectural forum and sciencetific forum . I choose scientific forum because I use scientific data . I search the answers . 100 gigaton CO2 atmostphere . If US emit 50 million tons CO2 , and US intend to reduce 1 lbs CO2 of the atmostphere so lands , sea , plants of US , ..... must absorb 50 millions and 1 lbs CO2 . I don't against any country when I bring a CO2 , O2 formula here . this thing cost a lot of time . I don't against any country if on my blogpost , I use a lot of images of of many building around the world . But because of Google Earth historical image , I only can choose what I can find , most of them only allow me come back to 1994 or 2002 , 2000 even I need to check the original area , before human use this land or that land to confirm they did good or bad . The main architectual rule of almost goverment's buildings will choose grassland in front of building if they have space even CO2 pollution of building's cars is huge . That is feeling , not science at all . And I only focus on buildings . I only hope 1 person here can understand me . I'm alone . I work with this project because I want to help our scientists . Lonely , darkness , no one understand me . Am I a stupid man when I pay attention on CO2 of people go to work , of the building everyday ?. I feel sad . really sad day by day . I'm only wish I finish my work . I will need somedays for an abstract . Thank you . P/S : I have a question : when I use Google search for land absorb CO2 . I can't find the land , type , soil , ..... under the cement , the floor , the stone , sidewalk , asphalt , .... or under skyscraper , can them absorb CO2 like before they built every thing above them ? It's not like natural soil , things we can plant every kind of plants . And cement , the floor , the stones , bricks , sidewalk , asphalt , ...... all things we use to create the surface of a city , can it absorb CO2 ? Thank you .