kitakaze

The following is the 1967 Patterson-Gimlin Film showing what is either an undiscovered bipedal primate walking along a creek bed in Bluff Creek, California or a man in a suit... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5e-8FeEEo-8 I'm interested in asking members, particularly those with training in physical anthropology and/or anatomy, their opinions on the subject of the film. 1) Do you think the film looks realistic or like a man in a suit? 2) Do you think the subject has normal proportions or proportions explainable by a man in a suit or anything that would qualify as inhuman proportions? The following graphic was made to demonstrate that the subject has an inhumanly long humerus... The following gif purports to show a bulging calf muscle... This shows a bending hand which is said to be impossible without mechanical hand extensions... This is supposed to demonstrate a moving brow not possible with a mask... The following is a paper by Jeff Meldrum, Professor of Anthropology at Idaho State University, and retired effects makeup artist Bill Munns making the argument that the subject is real and shows adipose tissue not possible with a man in a suit... http://www.isu.edu/rhi/pdf/Munns-%20...al%20draft.pdf I am not intending a debate on the existence of Bigfoot, only looking for opinions on the film subject from an anthropological/anatomical perspective.