Ant Sinclair

The post swansont is on this thread - Earths Atmospheric Oxygen Content, and as such phytoplankton produce O2 , therefore as such would have a bearing on O2 production and earths atmospheric Oxygen content, if ultra violet radiation kills phytoplankton as would Cesium137 too then this affects the earths O2 volumes. Iam sorry if in My logic in this isn't correct assumption. Strange I havn't found that exact NASA quote My self but will look later, if phytoplankton is being damaged by Fukushima and other enviromental issues, on top of that We have deforrestation etc then when as I read a while ago that at one point China was commissioning a coal fired power station at the rate of one a week, wouldn't all these issues work in synergetic way in lowering Earths Atmospheric Oxygen Content?

This was an article in the Guardian News Paper as regards falling O2 levels on Earth and a couple of excerpts from it, the link at the bottom of page is to the article; Much of this recent, accelerated change is down to human activity, notably the industrial revolution and the burning of fossil fuels. The Professor of Geological Sciences at Notre Dame University in Indiana, J Keith Rigby, was quoted in 1993-1994 as saying: "In the 20th century, humanity has pumped increasing amounts of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere by burning the carbon stored in coal, petroleum and natural gas. In the process, we've also been consuming oxygen and destroying plant life cutting down forests at an alarming rate and thereby short-circuiting the cycle's natural rebound. We're artificially slowing down one process and speeding up another, forcing a change in the atmosphere " Very interesting. But does this decline in oxygen matter? Are there any practical consequences that we ought to be concerned about? What is the effect of lower oxygen levels on the human body? Does it disrupt and impair our immune systems and therefore make us more prone to cancer and degenerative diseases? Surprisingly, no significant research has been done, perhaps on the following presumption: the decline in oxygen levels has taken place over millions of years of our planet's existence. The changes during the shorter period of human life have also been slow and incremental until the last two centuries of rapid urbanisation and industrialisation. Surely, this mostly gradual decline has allowed the human body to evolve and adapt to lower concentrations of oxygen? Maybe, maybe not. The story at sea is much the same. Nasa reports that in the north Pacific ocean oxygen-producing phytoplankton concentrations are 30% lower today, compared to the 1980s. This is a huge drop in just three decades. The argument for divesting from fossil fuels is becoming overwhelming. http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2008/aug/13/carbonemissions.climatechange I don't know the date when NASA had alledgedly stated that Phytoplankton had been reuced by 30% but if it was pre - Fukushima as UV Rays kill Phytoplankton wouldn't Fukushimas' contiued radio - active pollution do the same?

And so would it follow that if a family/families of psychopaths that were horrible and cruel took control of the world and stayed in control, cruel and horrible happenings would go on forever until these families were relieved of their control? When We are growing up and We are taught to be kind, courteous etc, aren't these kind of teachings meant to lead us away from animal like behaviour and make Us into Human Beings?

Point taken Phi for all and split to Ethics.

Iam most proud of anything I have ever done in My life in the fact that I have saved six lives all at different times and all from drowning, one of these people even bullied Me when were young and I still pulled Him out of the water. If there are only Human Beings on this planet how can other Human Beings be so cruel to others and treat them like they do. Absolutely every problem on this planet could be corrected in a better way by scientists and science rather than by belligerance and those that seem to like it. I honestly can't comprehend that Man-Kind alone could become so "Evil". I realise there are many amazing minds on here so please explain to Me why all the terrible things that happen do if there is no outside influence.

Iam most proud of anything I have ever done in My life in the fact that I have saved six lives all at different times and all from drowning, one of these people even bullied Me when were young and I still pulled Him out of the water. If there are only Human Beings on this planet how can other Human Beings be so cruel to others and treat them like they do. Absolutely every problem on this planet could be corrected in a better way by scientists and science rather than by belligerance and those that seem to like it. I honestly can't comprehend that Man-Kind alone could become so "Evil". I realise there are many amazing minds on here so please explain to Me why all the terrible things that happen do if there is no outside influence.

Because one of them is the ex-Canadian Minister of Defence and the other two are former Astronauts maybe? " <sigh>"

https://m.youtube.co...h?v=nqe1dgpoUtA Are these Three Fine Gentlemen not corroborating each other?

1) I do not believe anything that certain famous people say. 2) As stated before witness statements do count, even in a court of law. 3) We are not done as there is a lot more to follow!

So what. They have no evidence. (This is getting tedious.) You are correct!

My point is they are Fine Outstanding Gentlemen of International Renown!

Ok, if there was a dead body and blood, and it was in an American Court Room with those two Outstanding Gentlemen ?

And so would it follow that if Edgar Mitchell and Gordon Cooper were the only witnesses to a murder but had no video footage that a judge wouldn't take them seriously from the dock?

Does evidence in a court not come from witness statements?

All I'm asking is that it is given consideration, You seem to have jumped into a massive defensive stance, why?, when You haven't even had time to even watch the videos?

Who the Astronauts, Paul Hellyer or Phil Schneider ? There are more well known names to come yet Strange - will they all be "fantasists" ? I didn't bring David Icke up Strange You just did, whether the Royals are Baby Eaters I don't know because I've never had lunch with them.

What about the two former astronauts Strange? How can You make an appraisal after only about a minute looking at this?

Below is a link to a web page, in this page there is a video with Phil Schneider, it is claimed that Phils' Father was a Captain in the US Military, it is also claimed Phil worked for the US Military as a Geologist. Is He another wing-nut or telling the truth? http://beforeitsnews.com/strange/2013/09/us-military-reptilian-symbolism-2451612.html Below is a video of Dr Edgar Mitchell a former Astronaut discussing aliens on CNN, also in this video is another former Astronaut Gordon Cooper stating He'd seen UFOs. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nqe1dgpoUtA

I see where You are coming from Phi for all on this and these question marks/exclamation marks were not for that reason just as I deliberately put Iam and not I am and also why in quoting Max Planck the "existance" was spelt wrong because of the faith I have. None of these were done to belittle any members as after working on large engineering projects in the UK have come across many intelligent minds and have respect for such minds in their efforts to have gained their knowledge, like with Bignose I have taken Your words on board.

Thank You Bignose I have "listened" to You on this issue and will conduct My posts accordingly in future!

Strange Scientist Senior Members4, 242 postsLocation 他国 Posted 13 October 2014 - 08:01 PM Ant Sinclair, on 13 Oct 2014 - 7:59 PM, said: Please Strange look over the thread again, this is a speculation that has a different take on atomic make up! But it is giving the wrong results. It is as simple as that. Shouldn't you have abandoned it as soon as you discovered that? quote name="Strange" post="858568" timestamp="1426683284"] Maybe a significant number of other people thought your reaction was unreasonable. If those new ideas are not based on evidence then deterring them is a Good Thing. I do Bignose and after the exchange with Strange in Canadians & Aliens told Myself "I will not get caught out like that again", but I do feel I have been unfairly treated and wanted to state that!, and the accumulating -ve Rep points over one issue do not fully represent My contributions to SF.net!

I believe this kind of "carry-on" will deter new ideas from coming to Science Forums.net!

Again a -1Rep point for this post, can You not see how this would be perceived as "bullying"?, I think this is a very sad advertisement for Science Forums.net!!! !

In My oppinion I believe I have been targeted/unfairly treated, lets see what the other members oppinions are as they read the latest posts on this thread! And again I call for both +ve & -ve Rep points to be shown on a memebers profile to better indicate the value of their posts! !!!

?