Ant Sinclair

We know that there are countless radioactive decays taking place at any one time on the Earth and elswhere, Have there ever been any studies to determine if they are 'beating'(decaying) in time together? Is there a common clock to all these decays?

In Earth terms it's a large mass, in Universal terms(the Milkyway has a much larger mass) the mass is minor. If magnetic fields are not playing a part in keeping G constant everywhere, what is causing it to be so?

I'm not sure if I'm doing this correctly but for an approximation is it good? If the radius of the universe is 46.9e9LY, can I then use 4/3 pi r3 formula for the calculation? This works out at approximately 4.321e32 - so would there be 4.321e32KG?

A 'tiny' amount of mass ....... mmmm Below is from the Royal Society regarding the left-hand cosmological magnetic field strange! https://www.ras.org.uk/news-and-press/2635-left-handed-cosmic-magnetic-field-could-explain-missing-antimatter

The properties/contents of a magnetic field - if theres energy/particles/waves there, through E=MC2 shouldn't there be an equivalent mass of the magnetic fields in the Universe?

Whatever the magnetic fields components/properties are, could they be related to mass in any way?

I could or I could which I already have, mailed such experts supplying a link to said post, so thanks for Your tip strange

So then strange as We know these days there are magnetic fields Universe-Wide, what constitutes a magnetic-field? - are these fields fields of nothing or do they contain forms of energy, all this energy can be related to mass through Alberts' work, do the magnetic fields relate to a substantial mass?

Iam patient ;-)

Strange the last line in Your post quoted above beginning (*) - can You explain what it means please!

On that note strange Iam now 'parking' this thread untill such an expert shares his thoughts on Post No.12 of this thread!

There have been many helpful hints such as Hypers' about joining genealogy clubs, that way learning from other peoples' experience about the best way to search. The leg-work side of this kind of research is probably something I'd consider when I retire as We all can appreciate this kind of activity could be quite time consuming. Something We discovered recently is My Grandfathers Uncle is buried in a village here in North Yorkshire only 4 miles away using the utilities on Ancestry, We haven't popped by to find Him yet but intend to, when We say hello it'll probably the first time He's had a chat with a member of the family in a long time

Seeing as this thread is concerning H2O & OH Mega-Masers maybe a chemistry expert could come on thread and enlighten Us to the questions asked above.

I do agree that it is uniform, are magnetic fields a part of the reason the G Constant is the same every where?

Of the two types of fusion reactor the reactions are initiated differently, the older type by a fission explosion and the later type by lasers if I remember correctly. Either way these reactions are initiated by Energy! OH + H2O > H2O + OH with an Ion Exchange, is this correct? If this is correct so far then water and hydroxide moving at high velocities 60km/s+ and at high densities could be exchanging a 'decent ammount' of Ions - could this be correct?

Below strange is an extract and below it a link to the Astronomy Monthly News Letter, when this link is clicked it gives access to all their News Letters, click on No.272 the August 2015 Edition - this is this below. The current paradigm of star formation through accretion disks, and magnetohydrodynamically driven gas ejections, predicts the development of collimated outflows, rather than expansion without any preferential direction. We present radio continuum observations of the massive protostar W75N(B)-VLA 2, showing that it is a thermal, collimated ionized wind and that it has evolved in 18 years from a compact source into an elongated one. This is consistent with the evolution of the associated expanding water-vapor maser shell, which changed from a nearly circular morphology, tracing an almost isotropic outflow, to an elliptical one outlining collimated motions. We model this behavior in terms of an episodic, short-lived, originally isotropic, ionized wind whose morphology evolves as it moves within a toroidal density stratification. Accepted by Science (vol.348, p.114) http://arxiv.org/pdf/1507.05285 http://www.ifa.hawaii.edu/~reipurth/newsletter.htm We model this behavior in terms of an episodic, short-lived, originally isotropic, ionized wind whose morphology evolves as it moves within a toroidal density stratification. Ion Exchange has to be the Spark-Plug Firing Up The Star surely!

Below is an extract and below it the Link from where it came. Is the article correct concerning Uniform Gravity Across The Universe - is this what is currently accepted? Astronomers using the National Science Foundation's (NSF) Green Bank Telescope (GBT) in West Virginia and its Arecibo Observatory in Puerto Rico conducted a 21-year study to precisely measure the steady "tick-tick-tick" of a pulsar known as PSR J1713+0747. This painstaking research produced the best constraint ever of the gravitational constant measured outside of our Solar System. Pulsars are the rapidly spinning, superdense remains of massive stars that detonated as supernovas. They are detected from Earth by the beams of radio waves that emanate from their magnetic poles and sweep across space as the pulsar rotates. Since they are phenomenally dense and massive, yet comparatively small - a mere 20-25 kilometers across - some pulsars are able to maintain their rate of spin with a consistency that rivals the best atomic clocks on Earth. http://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog/2015/08/a-distant-pulsar-reveals-gravity-as-constant-throughout-the-universe.html

Can I Please Call On A Resident Expert To Clear This Up; What Exactly are the roles of Water & Hydroxide Mega-Masers - Are They A Key Process in Star-Formation and Could These Shock-Waves Be Caused By H2O/OH Ion Exchange?

You said You doubt there would be enough energy in the exchange of electrons Strange, WOULDN'T that depend quite a lot on the densities present?

Thanks for Your reply Captain, We have paid for copies of documents such as birth certificates etc here in the UK, I was maybe hoping by chance that some reading may have looked back into an Italian background but all tips/help are welcome.

Where do these shock-waves You mention originate from?, could it be beause of some kind of Ion exchange between the H2O & OH?

Below is an Harvard paper, in it it's mentioning H2O & OH Mega-Masers and also Star-Formation. Could the EXPERTS explain what they are meaning in this paper, is Water and Hydroxide actually present, are they meaning these two Mega-Masers are a component in Star-Formation, if there are more Water Masers to One Hydroxide Maser would this lead to the creation of a larger star etc? Link to paper; http://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-iarticle_query?bibcode=1993ApJ...402L..69M&db_key=AST&page_ind=1&plate_select=NO&data_type=GIF&type=SCREEN_GIF&classic=YES

Orion to those of Us here that don't have these math skills, it all looks so complex. How long time-wise would it take to do these calculations?

My Mum got to that certain point a few months ago and paid to use Ancestry.com in an attempt to find out where Her maternal line had come from and also the roots of where Her brown eyes had come from, I managed to trace the brown eyes using Ancestry and it turns out there was a marriage in the family to an Italian Gentleman from Como, Lake Lombardi in Italy, His name being Dominico Brentani, The Lady He married, Eliza Wall turned out to be interesting in that She descended from The Middletons - these were the ancestors of My Grandfather Henry on My Mums side of the family. My Mums Mum My Gran was a Jackson and We are still looking at all of this and have mailed folk in Italy to get further back down the roots of Dominico. Have any members any tips they can give for this kind of research, are there any better genealogy type sites like Ancestry out there or are they all similar?

Unless the comprehension of the construction of O was misundertood! I have no further use of this thread other than to say that it will now be integrating into the Energy Constants Model. Thanks for reading