Christophe

Comparing further research in finding what would be earths magnetic field in equilibrium I compared the following attached images. A magnet compared to a sphere compared to the earth, at first I thought the lines would take a path revolving around the earth but maybe it would simple flow through the earth itself from S to N, could there be another effect around these main paths that could revolve around the earth? I'm thinking like a double magnetic field? One S to N and then another revolving radially around them.

During one of Teslas moments in perfecting AC current he mentions in enlightenment to his discovery. "The magnet should rotate, just as the earth rotates around the sun" The movement and displacement of a magnet to create a magnetic field, in a similar ordinance to the natural displacement of the earth. The moon seems like an interesting subject all of a sudden...

Interesting, haven't seen any mention of that yet.

Essentially due to the perspective of the size of Earth I would argue that it is a pretty decent conductor, sure the resistivity of each individual material type within its grounds would provide such. The ratio of mass and potential through space seems to overcome its limitation on being "too resistive" to carry a flow within its matter. Conservation of mass played a big role in my understanding of this Thank you Lavoisier! well we have a combination of both correct? The magnetic field in respect to earths motion (in rotation, not in movement around the sun). As well as the changes in the Magnetic Field over time, sure its not a lot in our minuscule perspectives as people on earth, however in relation to the size and proportional relation it may simply be an overlooked aspect. (This would require some hefty mathematical breakdowns which. In complete understanding of the internals of the earth is only so limited by our technology to "See" through the earth with sonar scans and measuring of density by the length/angle of a waves return etc. Speculation must complete our observation of the internals of the Earth as we have no direct way of "dissecting" and observing for sure. I most certainly did, however i have observed that something attached to an object doesn't necessarily act AS the object, especially through experiments in observation of electrical charge distributed along a metallic sphere, I was simply stating the earth (or even below certain points of depth within the earth) have potentials that we don't completely justify yet since our observation of the inside is completed speculation as mentioned under the quote above this one. (this in itself is speculation of course) In the case of physical displacement in space, it change character as we dive deeper into the higher density and higher gravitation force towards the center (speculation once more, i mentioned a sphere spinning on a 2D plane) To speculate on the "part of Earth" What about inside? Again i feel that layers of shifting mass underneath the earth are indeed moving in respect to the Magnetic Field already as it is, hence the natural occurrence of natural dissasters. Seems there is a missing piece here. In part we know that the magnetic field already does conduct much of the internal movement and atmospheric movement of earth (correct?), So why couldn't we observe the Earth as already being a conductor in relation to such observation? If nothing was being stimulated (electrons within a tectonic plate) to force a movement in relation to the magnetic field within a 3D "cutout" of the inside of the earth, then we would not have mass moving underneath us and less dense mass moving above us. (one of the leading ideas behind the "Ether" movement back in the day). I have taken a look in and will add his ideas to the research as they seem directly relevant to the possible mechanics terrestrial conductivity, his observation of Aurorae seems also intriguing. Personally i believe we understand many concepts about the earth in separate relating factors (tectonic plates, weather patterns, aurorae), but i believe they all share a common source of manifestation and thus could be legitimately manipulated. I remember reading Tesla mention something about the conductivity within the earth is much different than what we use above its ground, there may be certain frequencies or certain observations that he has made in realizing a way to transfer such wireless power without the effects of such hefty resistivity (maybe a slight stimulation in the earth atmosphere to loosen the electrons? who knows). Sadly his tower was destroyed and his documents ceased by FBI official <enter conspiracy theory here>. My main question is always "why" but sometimes that question goes unanswered. Which is ok with me, I can let go of such troubling actions. The intriguing part is that they DID take down the tower and they DID confiscate his documents, those are intentions in my opinion. Intention such as these give off a peculiar direction towards his work and his understanding, like there is something we are overlooking. I have quite the arsenal of information from our conversation here, I will look further into many pieces and if i find something of interest I shall leave the trail here! Once again, I am much appreciative of our process through these subjects! Namaste

One could also consider to wonder what the total distance even is? We can travel half the distance to infinity and never reach that particular destination, but what if our perception of distance is that movement, what seems to be half that distance is from my room to the kitchen, and then another half would be my movement from the kitchen to the garage, and so forth. We may "see" we are traveling a complete path from point A to point B, but are we really fulfilling that particular path that we are restricted by in terms of time. Maybe we simply have incorporated a tolerance of this limitation in our physical dimension by "arbitrarily" defining what path A to path B will "look" like to us, but not in relation to time in its own dimension.

I genuinely appreciate your time and patience studiot! It has definitely helped in my understanding and a great set of new tools as I review more of Tesla's work. Reading your questions in reference to my questions actually brought a smile to my face! The true meaning of scholarly exchange of ideas! What do you think about Earth as the conductor? I have seen references of its mention, and as far as most observations we know that it is a at a neutral charge (thus being able to absorb excess electrons as a "grounding" system) What happens to the electrons as they disperse into the ground? Sure they do spread apart and distribute themselves evenly, but at some critical point electrons must escape this magnificent conductor in order to remain in equilibrium? In perspective of the magnetic field and its existence outside of the earth itself; the earth is spherical, and its physical motion makes a very small displacement as say if a cube was spinning in space, its corners would create a displacement. However a sphere may spin in any direction and still maintain no displacement in reference to its location in time and space. The moving factors again are the magnetic field from both the rotation around the sun moving in a radial motion, and the spin of the axis also moving in a radial motion, this is the observation of movement at an indefinitely small displacement from the surface of the earth. But the shape of the earth itself (if you picture a sphere spinning in a 2D plane) completely void of motion (other than the mass itself moving). Of course using the Earth as a natural conductor would pose a few ideas: The layers of the earth themselves and the materials and their individual conductivity The direct "Center" of the earth, we know that it is surrounded by a less dense "liquid" as opposed to the mass of the center, does the massive center also spin or remain stationary?

I do hope I am not causing any frustration with my questions, but I feel that questions are what pose the existence of ideas, and thus far in civilization many questions have concluded fantastic feats in science. As to the subject: I understand your explanation; I picture the experiment where a stationary coil of a certain radius, and a magnet being displaced inside the coil itself creating such stimulation of the electrons that already exist inside the coil to a moving current in respect to the direction of the magnet being displaced inside the coil. What about the idea that we (from the perspective of space) are already in motion? in a continuous revolution around a predictable path? This motion does not fulfill the first criteria where a source energy is supplied mechanically to move the magnet through space? We can imagine that the earth with its wobbly axis already moves through space. what about its direct location of the poles? The north and south pole, already may Abstractly resemble a large magnet moving through space? In this perspective wouldn't mechanical energy be already supplied on earth ("magnet") in such able to initiate automated source energy? I have no practical answers for such because I have only recently "imagined" if you will, this concept from my limited understanding of magnetic fields and the already existing one sourced by our planet. My ambitions seek either a complete connection to this hypothesis, or a direct rebuttal in order to be satisfied. If this hypothesis has any chance of being correct, this may mean an alternative source of energy from an existing source that we may have overlooked over the years of electronic development. I have read many works on tesla including his personal biography of his ambitions and he seemed to understand something about this connection between the planets Magnetic Field and its potential to power "wirelessly" devices across the world at any dynamically appeasing voltage. Many concluded that the tower that he has built would be the source of the power itself, traveling thousands of miles across the globe to provide such energy, I have observed that his words directly involve a part of the Earth as his source of energy, in what I am visioning the conversion (Transformer based device) between the existing potentials of the earths rotation through space as a form of harness-able power. If I am causing any issues with my observations please let me know and I shall try to take this elsewhere. The last thing I want to cause is any problems.

Just as a transformer, we purposely insulate transformers in their casing to prevent external interference with the internal system. This, to me, says that there is a particular affect from the natural Magnetic Current of the Earth or any other electronics in the vicinity. In conclusion, could we use a transformer ( or possibly a specialized version of a transformer catered to a more macro based interaction with an already existing magnetic field? Good call on the transformer direction, I couldn't quite put it in existing comparisons. Once again I pose the question: Could not the Magnetic Field of Earth be capable of creating currents in "Transformer" like devices that would stimulate a current of electrons and thus function as a giant "charging pad"? Again, if the answer is yes or no please do follow up with any direct references for further study.

It most certainly does direct me in the right direction! I do completely accept feedback in all forms as I personally am aware of my limitation and my aspiration in growth, I never claim to know more than what I can grasp and I am continuously looking to grasp more with personal development. In further research I would like to clarify what my hypothesis hopes to acknowledge In reference to the two methods a Magnetic Field Manifests in our reality: Electron with displacement over a distance Natural Existing Magnetic Fields (Earth) http://www.trifield.com/content/about-electromagnetism/ We know that the movement of an electron through time-space can create an electric field of attraction or repulsion, as well as a radial magnetic field (if displacement is through a wire with an existing current) ie, the displacement of the Electric fields produced by electrons stimulate a magnetic field The main question: Could not the Magnetic field of the earth serve as the potential for electrons to be stimulated to create a current? If yes or no please explain with ideas to references if possible. I really do appreciate this! [Add] Just as the "primary winding" in current wireless charging devices create a magnetic field for the "secondary winding" in the target charging device, could not the Earth already be creating this Primary winding?

Thank you for your insight and i shall dwell deeper on these subjects. My mentions of the relation between "Magnetic Fields" and "wind" is purely abstract and symbolizes no direct correlation in their conceptual manifestations. As far as your religious reference: Namaste: Indian gesture of greeting: a polite bow of greeting or farewell used by Hindus, made with the hands held at chest height and both palms pressed together One cannot use a polite gesture by its bare definition? I am sorry that this has caused confusion in subject of the matter. The concept is already present as we use wireless charging devices in a similar manner but on a lower scale, I may have worded my concept incorrectly but one cannot disagree that it has not already been developed through wireless charging devices in current day and age. I will refrain from using anything "religious" based vocabulary on the intent of politeness to refrain future confusion as I have no relation to eastern religion other than this one word. I do apologize for using such a stigmatic word in which has confused the subject matter, this concept is purely related to Physics.

Hello friends, I would like to introduce a concept that has been brought to my attention through my understanding of Magnetic Fields at the conceptual level. Firstly to introduce myself, I am a Computer Science student with passions in just about all subjects including but not limited to Astronomy and Physics. My experience in application is limited but my understanding of concepts is stable. Intro As we know Solar Winds particularly effect our atmosphere through spikes that affect electronic equipment through these surges of disturbance in the magnetic field of our home, Earth. This effect poses an interesting interaction between the Magnetic Fields on our planet and the electronic equipment that we use today. Definition: In such similarity of Magnetic fields (minus the magnitude comparison between the Suns Magnetic Field and the Earths natural Magnetic Field) I have dubbed the word "Magnetic Wind" in accordance with its flowing characteristics and invisible interaction by physical observation, just as wind itself. [Note: The comparison in mention of "Magentic Fields" and "Wind" is purely abstract and in no way combines conceptual manifestations of each individual definition as related to the other. This was simply an observation made to signify the definition of Magentic Wind as respect to the Earth, as Solar Wind relates to the Sun.] In current observation of Earths Magnetic Field (dubbed Magnetic Wind), research facilities have observed the flow and it presents itself like so: http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/image/0211/field_glatz_big.gif (attached is the image of this link) It is quite chaotic, as far as my conceptual understanding this sort of distorted field produces movement of tectonic plates in non-synchronized directions cause collisions and of course leading to Earthquakes and fault lines. In similar aspects our weather patterns are affected by the Magnetic Fields guidance of our atmospheric pressure. Concept: Using our definitions and understandings above, i would like to introduce a concept that may have already been understood by previous minds in history. If it is possible to stabilize and Harmonize the Magnetic Wind (i assume it would be a one directional motion around the earth) The second image attached is my interpretation of what this might conceptually look like. If this was the case, a consistent directional magnetic field could power induction based devices simply through its natural source. One could develop devices (such as Tesla's devices) to be powered by the natural flow of the Magnetic Wind. In other interpretation this could stabilize our atmosphere and reduce extremities in weather patterns. Outreach: My interest is hearing from my peers in similar or higher understanding of these concepts. Please leave any observation, inconsistencies, and other ideas below. Thank you for your feedback! Namaste. More than anything I would like to be proven wrong so that I may sleep again at night.