AB Hammer

LOL toy knife? that one is different. I agree that proof for perpetual motion of evidence is only a working device. What gets me it is the same for gain as in "you cant get more than you put into it". So I did a test of a device I made where that when I lifted one attached weight of the device and I carefully released by lifting a finger not pushing it and if it makes a full rotation back over the top there is a gain.Then it made a second round faster than the first. Then it made the third round and the other end the shift failed for it would shift earlier each round.then it rocked till it came to a stop.The point is that the gain should not have happened. The device is a mechanical wheel of death device. I am trying to get some time to finish the new device to correct the problem with to fast of shifting and I will see again. If it works? I will post in on my youtube, forums and take it to LSU for other conformations. Max Planck's statement is self explanatory and is one of his famous quotes. My argument is we tend to be to fast to say impossible due to the over confidence in our knowledge as we learned it. Take religion for example. how many different religions and they all say they are right. There has never been a perfect man and the writings from man is not perfect but it is the best we have when it come to science. Look up wheel of death on youtube and you will see some of my inspiration.

Yes physics does work. But do we truly know everything about physics? We can only make asumtions on what made Bessler's wheel do work, and how it was done, and we need to ask though. Has Bessler found a loophole in how we understand physics? Below is another statement from Max Plank that leave the posibility open, despite so many failers but how many of those where trying the same approach as the others. There has to be another approach that has not been tried. I tend to look at this quest as it is not always the end result but what you learn on the way. >>“We have no right to assume that any physical laws exist, or if they have existed up until now, that they will continue to exist in a similar manner in the future.”<< Quote By Max Planck father of Quantum physics 1858 - 1947

As one who has played with the attempts to manipuate in a device to use gravitaional forces for over 8 years, as a hobby of course. You have to overcome the same force to lift as what makes the other side drop. LOL To work from this point is only a learning curve at best. To use a combination of other energy sorces to get more out of gravity is a fair direction to go. From my work as a blacksmith gravity use is used even with the simple yet not so simple swing of a hammer. The average person swings a hammer as hard as they can and it supplies X amout of force to the item being hammered. As a smith you learn to manipulate by sertain actions with your arm to hand pivoting mainly from the shoulder and you can create 5 times the amount of force to the item being hammered. Not to mention not getting nearly as tired from the physical work. To look at this from a micancal standpoint or the adition of adding magnitisum in the system to find the extra actions needed to gain advantage to get more out of gravity. Is this possible today? It was reported done in the early 18th century by a many called Bessler and was supported by many as true but there where some that did not support Bessler as the displayed machine did work and passed longanjevity test. but some non supporters even tried to get Bessler to show the inside of his machine without paying for the device in court by calling him a fraud and had false whineses as Bessler was not convitted. The loss is, we don't have his design to see how he did it, nore can we prove he didn't do it either. So those who feel it can be done have some historic value to say it can.be done.