Mordred

Supersymmetry has proposed various other Higgs mass particles. Though they also predict other heavier particles as well. A heavier form of Higgs will allow fine tuning of the seesaw mechanism. There is numerous variations of the SO (10) MSSM model. Having more than one Higgs will support a double seesaw model instead of the current single seesaw. There are several multi seesaw models under SO (10) MSSM. However we haven't confirmed the spin statistics of this particle as far as I know. For a Higgs particle it must be spin zero

BINGO and we have a winner. The required mass is in the opposite direction. However acceleration increase in the opposite direction is wrong. The Net acceleration at any given radius must be approximately constant to have a constant velocity curve. Your also wrong about the spin of gravity. Gravity has spin 2 characteristics. This has been measured via gravity waves. By the way just how do you believe an increasing acceleration gives a constant velocity? BASIC math should tell you otherwise.

As far a what is meant by the terminology and geometry behind spacetime. The best answer is learn the calculations

roflmao. This forum gets woowoo in units of tons

You don't necessarily need to know why. If you can make predictions as to how something influences other dynamics.. For example we know how the cosmological constant influences expansion. We know its extremely constant. We don't know why its constant. That doesn't prevent us from understanding its influence. example two We know the universe exists. We don't know why it exists. example 3. We know the speed of interactions =c. We know nothing goes faster c. We don't know why.

well a planet can be tidally locked in the goldilocks zone. This could occur with red dwarf stars which potentially could support life. The problem here is having the right atmosphere to filter out the radiation. Particularly since the planet needs to be extremely close to the parent star. Though tidal influence and seasonal change are potential influences supporting life.

peddling woowoo. How much is a pound of woowoo? 🙄

the mass curve correlation plots an increasing mass density from the centre of a galaxy outward. This is due to the radius element enclosing a greater portion of mass. Distribution of a halo not an isothermal disk profile. That greater mass is the influence of Dark matters contribution to the gravitational potential. NOT 80% of the Universe Ever stop to wonder why the NFW profile is a double power law?

The field your describing contains energy density. Which correlates to mass. Which you have a greater flow toward a BH. The exact opposite to solving a galaxy rotation curve. You need that added acceleration in the OPPOSITE direction. Come on this is a simple relationship. Anyone can simulate greater inflow by increasing the mass of the BH. Thats precisely what f=ma states as a vector. Your problem is you need that force vector the opposite direction

I agree but Delcan has yet to formulate this change.

What does mirrors or observation influence have to do with rotation curves? We already account for observational redshift influence. Either way your missing mass is in the wrong direction. Why would a BH be any different than any other gravitational body.? How does a volume flow? Come on man we already showed the error in thinking spacetime flow. Your model shows none of these dynamics other than your misinterpreted data. How does a blackhole eat a volume? except for increasing its event horizon? You really need to go back and study. The terminology usage you use is horrendous.

welcome to forum rules. You can recommend a book provided its not your own.

you don't move a static field that already accounts for how particles move without adding energy. You aleady know the vacuum solution already correlates particle movement. You also know it already accounts for Time dilation and redshift. You know those same metrics do not solve the missing mass problem The Schwartzchild metric already accounts for infalling matter. (matter field) despite being a vacuum solution. adding more inflow just makes the Kepler problem even worse. That will be like adding greater mass at the BH. You need your additional mass in the OPPOSITE direction. Thats why your descriptives and equations still have a Kepler decline. You added to the WRONG vector.

did you derive that addition? If so please point out that equation. Ive looked for your added field in your papers. I couldn't find it. that last paper is even worse grr... time dilation is neglibible in galaxy rotation curves. Even if it wasn't we can already account for it. your added f brings us back to the problem of adding energy to the system. Which changes the metric tensor via the stress tensor.

then do so. So far you haven't. Your end equation in this paper certainly doesn't show a solution. your paper on SR only shows a vacuum solution of gravitational potential. It doesn't show any added dynamic. mathematically. Not verbally. Though mathematical wise you SR paper is decent. Your verbal descriptions in it is another matter lol (though we already covered some of that aspect this thread) lets put it in simple English. In order to maintain a constant velocity term. your sum of forces or gravitational accekeration must stay consistent as a function of radius from a point source. The BH itself. Now we both know this isnt the case in the Schwartchild metric. Which definetely has an increase in gravitational acceleration as you aproach it. However it is the case using the NFW profile with a halo dark matter distribution.

ok if a=v^2/r in order to keep v constant over r is to gradually increase mass as you increase radius. Based on point mass via shell theorem. Baryonic matter distrubution alone doesn't support a constant velocity curve. thats why the Keplarian curve is referred to as the missing mass problem

I quoted your formula in the last post. you tell me

that isn't what I'm saying at all. Without reading ANY of your papers. Nor any other post. If someone were to look at your formula. How can that person possibly use that formula to describe a system to the dynamics your describe? [latex]v=\frac {a^2}{r}[/latex] by the way why didn't you leave it in units of force or gravitational potential? the only detail shown is two scalar values. one for radius. the other is the acceleration. the dynamics you describe is increased acceleration closer to the BH. That means velocity will be greater closer to the BH. Not CONSTANT. Lastly based on baryonic matter distribution of ALL SPIRAL galaxies. The greatest mass concentration is the galactic bulge. The mass distribution of baryonic matter distribution tapers off as r increases. this includes M33. This is one reason why this equation doesn't work. [latex]v=\sqrt{\frac{GM}{r}}[/latex]. it works great for solar systems and even BHs until you need time dilation. Even without time dilation it gives the Keplar curve. However you want a Keplar curve for a solar system around a BH. OR star. But not for galaxies.

[latex]v=\frac {a^2}{r}[/latex] this equation cannot nor does not show a constant velocity as you increase r. Not unless your doing your math wrong.

This is the formula you give. [latex]v=\frac{a^2}{r}[/latex] [latex]v=\frac{GM}{r}[/latex] Your interpretation on galaxy curves doesn't match the model with dark matter. Nor does it match any verbal description you've given.

Thats another aspect that makes little sense in his model. [latex]f=ma[/latex] [latex]a_c=\frac{v^2}{R}[/latex] [latex]F=\frac{GMm}{R^2}[/latex] combining the above [latex]F=\frac{GMm}{R^2}=\frac{mv^2}{R}=ma[/latex] Gives [latex]v=\sqrt{\frac{GM}{R}}[/latex] The last formula is what gives the Keplar curve. With baryonic mass distribution in our system the curve is an inverted slope. As most of the mass is the sun. So velocity decreases the further from Sun you get. Now applying that same formula to galaxy curves. Most of the mass is in the galactic bulge (strictly baryonic mass,no dark matter). So once again you get the Keplarian curve. So lets isolate the mass component [latex]m=\frac{v^2R}{G}[/latex] This last formula tells us you require a uniform mass distribution to maintain a uniform curve. However visible baryonic matter mass distribution isn't uniform. So you end up with a Keplarian curve. The velocity formula already incorperates centripetal acceleration.

Absolutely correct.

Field as in particle field. The metrics has that already. Which brings up an earlier question I asked quite some time ago. If the the particle field or interstellar medium is already following those geodesics. What distinquishes your field from that dynamic. Without adding any energy/mass density? I would suggest studying a radiation solution and vacuum solution to GR. You need to learn the pressure relations. Aka equations of state. Pressure may increase gravity but exerts pressure opposing gravity in localized amistrophy regions.

You can seperate a medium mass flow by the term "Interstellar medium" Which is all your dust, particles etc. Now the solution you just studied won't work too well for BH dynamics. Now you need to goto the Scwartzchild metric. You'll also learn the stress tensor on that metric.

Cross edit see above I should rather note a geodesic is a type of worldline. The metric tensor contains the worldline metric