Mordred

Keep in mind GR is a coordinate metric. Look at the Minkowskii metrics to understand it. The SR book I linked has the appropriate metrics to explain that image

The tools are to be used and read by you. After all you need to become the programmer recall one of my earlier posts on model development? That model is an accurate 3d coordinate map of GR.

Lol no one's perfect. I've been looking for simple lie algebra covering the symmetry groups. I never could latex the matrix particularly from a phone with auto correct that doesn't recognize science terms. Grr

If you think about it I supplied you the tools to develop your model. Aka all those links and references. Lol

Here is one of the better GUT articles. Of key note Is the running of the gauge constants. (Strength of each force). As you raise the temperature the 3 forces reach a state of thermal equilibrium. Forming the electroweak force. At 246 Gev the universe reaches the VeV. The coupling occurs prior to this I can't recall what FeB offhand. If I recall roughly 168 GeV. Now the Higgs denotes the vacuum expectation value. However if you continue raising the temperature the seesaw mechanism kicks in roughly 10^16 GeV. Coincidentally this is close to the temperature when inflation occurs. This mechanism is also involved in giving the quarks and leptons mass. Just a quick and dirty GUT explanation. Think of it this way define space time foam? Is this a form of aether? If that's the case there was a recent thread showing the problem with an aether. Lol coincidentally he also had foam in his descriptive. http://www.scienceforums.net/topic/81656-the-universe-is-a-continuum-of-matter/ By the way I never get offended. I enjoy helping others learn. However I teach what's in the textbooks. New ideas are great but one needs to learn what those models teach correctly before developing new models. How else can you test your model if you don't compare them to the existing?

Opinions are always relative lol. Those conservation rules are important to consider when involving gluon interactions. As well as quark interactions.

If the contributors causing expansion and the contributors causing gravity was equal and opposite precisely there would be no expansion. The universe would be static. It's not. Neither is there just one contributor to expansion. As Strange already mentioned.

No prob I just found this handy reference in lie algebra. I just glanced at it looks handy. Note the lorentz group page 26. http://arxiv.org/abs/math-ph/0005032 The O(3.1) is part of this group as. 3*3 matrix with 1 positive rotation.

The book recommends grade 12 calculus. It deals with the SO(5) model and teaches how to read the feyman diagrams as well as lie algrebra basics It's the first book I studied on particle physics.

There is also different conservation rules involved. Conservation of Lepton number Conservation of charge Conservation of flavor Conservation of isospin Conservation of color Conservation of momentum Conservation of energy What you posted wasn't a new model it's an understanding of the current one with misconceptions. Key one being space as a fabric (latex)

The mechanism are in the lie algebra reprentations. To describe it all would be an entire course. Here is a good lie algrebra text http://www.google.ca/url?sa=t&source=web&cd=3&ved=0CCIQFjAC&url=http%3A%2F%2Fphyweb.lbl.gov%2F~rncahn%2Fwww%2Fliealgebras%2Ftexall.pdf&rct=j&q=lie%20algebra%20representation&ei=bPCtVLiENdO2yATNzoLwBw&usg=AFQjCNHBYxv20i8oJmr5yNIKSgVwAANYgw&sig2=RmH0KMhZEUythhh0ECYp7g&bvm=bv.83134100,d.aWw

In a sense yes. You have to be careful in that statement. It would be accurate to say different classes of particles have different rules due to their interactions. Not all particles interact with the strong force, bosons specifically have limited interactions compared to fermions. It would be good to look at the interactions of each boson. Then lookup what properties define a particle. This will help with understanding their unique differences. Then consider the difference between inertial mass and rest mass. I'll post a GUT article for you. However without understanding the lie algebra involved in the different groups much of it won't make sense. The best beginner textbook is Griffiths "Introductory to particle physics" that I've studied taught me a ton. I mentioned before geometry is used in particle physics the O(3.1) group is an example. That is mentioned in the Sean Carroll General relativity article I posted on this thread If you want to prove your theory you mentioned your going to need considerable study. Including particle physics and calculus and differential geometry. The lie algebra uses differtial geometry in its symmetry groups. http://arxiv.org/abs/0812.0295 Here is a quantum geometrodynamic article.

It's easy to think the strong force and gravity go hand in hand. After all the mass of particles other than neutrinos and leptons is due to the strong force. Mass being a resistance to inertia. However once you start looking into GUT theories although we can predict the properties of the graviton we have never been able to produce or measure the graviton. Hence the debate is gravity a force which requires a boson. Or is gravity a property of space time geometry. Hence the name of the field quantum geometrodynamics.

When we say the universe expansion is accelerating it is the entire observable universe. However as mentioned the rate of expansion per Mpc is the same everywhere. It is the recessive velocity that is accelerating. This value depends on seperation distance. I posted how that works earlier in this thread. Now thermodynamics is specifically at a moment in time. To determine a specific thermodynamic state one must measure samples from the same moment in time.

If you can then yes. Good luck on that though.

Well there have been numerous attempts to unify the four forces. We can for every force except gravity. The three unified forces is the electroweak force.

Oops lol wife was yapping at me

Gluons is the force carrier for the weak force. The weak force applies to radiation. Gluons is the force carrier for the weak force. The weak force applies to radiation. Not that I'm aware of on the last paragraph

Ah but I did ask you questions. If you look at them they all encouraged you to define what types of compression

If I just gave you the answer right away would you have learned as much as you did? Would you have started learning calculus ?

Ps good luck drawing that image with rotational frame dragging due to the Earths rotation

Yes I knew about that image that was why I tried explaining aspects where compression can be an accurate descriptive. However I wanted you to also relate compression to energy/mass density As well as being clear on what is compressing. Ie space time coordinates. Or wavelengths of light that the observer measures

+1 I'll hunt down some good study aids. There is a series of YouTube lectures on GR with math. I'll look for it.

What is an image? Any image is merely a representative tool to aid in understanding. Any image can be described by mathematics. Those mathematical details is where the discoveries are often found. Take for example the rubber sheet 2d coordinate image used for gravity. How many misconceptions does it cause?

I found the best sources for how the Higgs behaves in geometric terms is via looking at the SO(10) Model. Good articles include the SO(10) GUT models. Keep in mind though the Higgs sector is full of speculation. This speculation is specifically related to how many Higgs bosons are there? We have found and confirmed the 126 Gev Higgs. There is supersymmetry predictions of others of different masses. The Higgs also has a metastability at high temperature that affects its field strength in a Mexican hat potential. This is the seesaw mechanism. This is exciting as this seesaw mechanism may explain inflation, dark energy and dark matter. Without adding exotic particles such as the inflaton. Earlier in the thread I already posted the related articles. Unfortunately they are tricky to read as they include lie algebra. I'm still hunting for good instructional articles on lie algebra to add to my site. Just a side note all particle interactions are described involving a form of geometry. If you can afford a textbook. One of my favourites for taking the complexity out of the geometry is "Roads to Reality" by Sir Roger Penrose. He covers a wide range of models in Cosmology string theory and particle physics fields such as QCD QED QFD. and quantum geometrodynamics (gravity specific) Not too many ppl are familiar with quantum flavor dynamics. QFD. The four fields cover the four forces. Collectively they are all part of QFT. I point out the above to make you aware just how large the field is on describing particle interactions. No one can claim to understand every aspect of particle physics.