Jump to content

nullus

Senior Members
  • Posts

    35
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by nullus

  1. see? you can do it more simple way
  2. I think we have to understand the question about this way: does it was registered observable collision of two non spiral galaxies?
  3. in a physics we can have a hole in a wall..... ( damn i hate this name.. ) nobody knows maybe black holes even can't produce a photon.. if singularity is already reached in a center of each black hole ( following big bang theory ) I think it is already supposed to give some effect.. no strange I do not have any evidence of this. this is just my prediction.
  4. are you talking about dark energy allso? can you write my just simple formula of negative, positive and matter energy in once??? swan come here and explain yourself !
  5. Then just a BIG BIG BIG BIG Thank you all.
  6. Can I give you something for such an incredibly huge help for me ??? I just do not know how to show my respect to all of you..
  7. ok thank you all, and what I shell give you for that? I was understand the lesson.
  8. yes, maybe I was supposed to say that I'm happy with yours answers. probably I'm burn some processors to lift up this question here..
  9. say YES and THANK YOU for teachers Does this help?
  10. no.. it is supposed to be better explanation for that, for me it is not enough only this, thanks anyway.
  11. yes, that's correct, thank you. but I mean the moment of explosion , isn't was supposed to be the blink of light ( if i can say so ) exactly in a moment, i mean something like nuclear explosion first light after what has happened.. can you explain me this? I not really understand it...
  12. hello. sorry about this question here, but so which direction we have to look to see the moment of BB of our universe?
  13. what possibilities do we have to stop the wars in earth?? answer 100% ( I can repeat it in a words ) ONE HUNDRED PERCENTS !!!! we easily can reverse things - understand that ours enemy is not us, but danger from nature danger from space powers and etc.. in a laws of nature we are here not to destroy ourselves, but continue survive and give a chance for our kids to live on this planet and to give a chance for us to hope to be the happy grandfather's.. we have most wonderful space ship ( earth ) with ours own star and infinite possibilities about what we can ever dream ! we can put a guards of resource balance, we can can put a guards of overpopulation to gently slow down the population with control of birth of new users and don't have catastrophic results, and do many many nice to us works... we are living in terrible time - we nearly destroy the planet, we scared that someone is want control all planet and we dont know what they are thinking, I don't think they want to leave destroyed planet for them own kids, but in a steps of evolution we have no chance to escape the mind and fact that we have to be come one big family.. I did my crazy calculus on it, and dont even ask how I did it ( I'm not standard model ) and I know it. we have so many peoples who want to work exactly on this direction, even on politics side and what we do? we do not turning our minds other way........ THIS IS NOT OUR WORLD ANY MORE THIS WORLD BELONGS FOR OUR SONS AND DAUGHTERS, AND WE HAVE TO MAKE FOR THEM POSSIBILITIES TO LIVE HERE AND LEARN THEM HOW TO DO IT FOR OUR GRANDCHILD'S. we are free to do it in our minds also, we are free to fix the world inside us. somebody have do the first step and start this discussion anyway - like a man and young father I just have to release this my minds of the deeps of my hard.. think and do what you want about this... I know we can - I know science can... strange stuff.. feel shame to say that.. feel shame becouse Im trying to think clear....
  14. ok I can take last 3 steps. 1. this is my garbage. 2. you throw on me positive black hole. 3. after first two I will decide if I want to take this discussion. 4. this is not my topic, we can't do it here. continue yours discussion about dark matter, Upon your request I will go - have some jobs to do. sorry if I waste yours time.
  15. if nobody here do not understand nothing here, see no reason to continue with this ( I do not think you are able to think and put attention on written words ) thank you anyway...
  16. thank you for understanding that I have problems with explanation. is it not him was lift up this hypothesis? I don't remember where I read this sorry.. please do not mix evidence with hypothesis and theories, they have to follow after. this is an execution.. okay I'll try to help you execute me quickly... look we have two different types of energy and matter ( I think we have evidence that they are ), they have same powers but working in opposite directions. we have evidence on this two energies -----> one is positive energy second negative energy if we place it in space ( vacuum ) -----> dark energy is positive black hole is negative then we have particles and antiparticles ( and evidence of them existing ) if u place it here -----> antiparticles particles and then what I call at this moment clear matter and clear antimatter -----> clear antimatter clear matter ( clear anti gravity ) ( clear gravity ) what is plus energy? -----> + energy is = + matter what is minus energy? - energy = - matter energy cannot exist without matter friction they are exchangeable. connection of those two powers = BANG and then everything mix together again... -----> positives and negatives are mixed.. what I want to say - so that those damn mixed positives and negatives it is everything but not a -----> dark energy and black hole and etc.. first of all this scale request for help to be fixed and correct named. second: dark mater it is still mixed those two + and - ( bastar... ) in very small scales do we have to call it Intergalactic "SUSHI" or somehow else I don't know. hope you understand what I'm talking about now?
  17. I think you're right, we can not call it antimatter and we cannot call it matter, if we follow Stephen Hawking hypothesis - clear antimatter must be produced by the "black hole" and dark matter what we are talking about ( if we talking about same ) it is still something what was left from BB, even if we want to keep a name as a dark matter after that supposed to go at least simple explanation, I dont know - at this moment I'm calling it just still mixed positives and negatives which ones can go to infinitely small scales, I agree we have to work on correct naming of everything like that and then we will have correct answers.
  18. ask moderators, they know with way my logic is builded. I dont want to make them angry with throw in same link everywhere...
  19. I maybe would agree, that in a moment of explosion each single particle of positive antimatter and negative matter reaching zero point, but not in a view that in a beginning was some small point, and something happens and its explode... NO ! ( just my logic )
  20. o yes it is, you can marry them only this way ( + ) + ( - ) = ( +- ) I think this literature we have to write we selves, I don't think we can find this somewhere else. I know you saw that video what I put in other topic.
  21. thank you thank you thank you.. optic is equals momentum of time, i hope you agree with that.
  22. thank you. at least for repeating everything i know. in my view, the answer must be given from optiks specialists and great engineers ( I'm not hope on the quick answer ).
  23. hi I'm specialize on very and very very global stuff even to infinity... - as rule I'm dump in other places... so me question is how possibilities do we have to observe the sky to 135 billion light years ( in money and waist of earth resources ) I do my calculus and I know we have other closest universes in 60 billions light ears, but I don't know in what conditions they are ( small plasma ball, or small dining "black hole" and etc.. ) to have free observation and do free calculations I think we have to observate 135 billion light years. I hope on yours sirius answers, thank you.
  24. I'm sure this is antimatter maybe not very clear. but is not supposed to named as dark matter, we have to rename it - not because it is easy but because it is hard ( I like this context of the words )
  25. how i remember dark is not exist.. or did I miss something ? NOT EXIST EXIST dark bright ( or not enough bright ) nothing everything not vacuous vacuous silence noise ( or not enough noise ) no etc etc correct me if I'm wrong. just try to name dark matter to clear positive antimatter, black hole to cluster of clear negative particles, and you will get levitation of mixed positives and negatives ( stars - galaxies - us ) in a middle, and answer why light is bent over massive object. is it clear antimatter is Sterile Neutrino? I think it is to early answer at least for me.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.