Tony

If you can remember this is my original post, You see satellites and the space station using solar panels to fuel themselves. Is it not possible to generate electricity in space. Knowing that if you spin something in space it spins forever unlike earth where it takes a force to move something. and a conductor cutting the flux in a magnet produces current. Unless I am missing some information, it should be real easy to produce a great deal electricity in space. So why do they use monster size expensive solar panels instead? Sorry to everyone that disagrees, Fact: NASA in conjunction with the Italians have done an experiment in space, similar to what I am suggesting and it proved successful. I am right you are all wrong. Proof: http://www1.msfc.nasa.gov/NEWSROOM/...996/96-009.html Read it and weep! Losers!!! The tether experiment is way cheaper than solar panel, and can produce far more electricity than solar panels. You people are absolute morons, concede defeat - Read the article.

Sorry to everyone that disagrees, Fact: NASA in conjunction with the Europeans have done an experiment in space, similar to what I am suggesting and it proved successful. I am right you are all wrong. Proof: http://www1.msfc.nasa.gov/NEWSROOM/news/releases/1996/96-009.html Read it and weep! To all those who oppose well.

As for the radio waves I was talking about. David Edward Hughes. Marconi was an innovator. Watson & Crick 1953

Understand this, let's not fight. When a wire moves through a magnetic field, a voltage is induced, and by Faraday's law, the amount of induced voltage is propotional to the number of loops in the wire and the rate at which the wire moves with respect to the magnetic field. Lenz's Law defines the polarity of the induced voltage. This is fundamentally how electricity is generated. On earth it take energy to move something, in space it takes initial energy to move something. The difference is that in space it will not stop moving unless something stops it moving. If resistances in the generator fuelling the sateliite cause the generator to slow down beyond a point where not enough voltage is generated to power the satellite. The amount of electricity produced at that stage would be so great, that energy stored in fuel cells would reset the generator to say 3,000 rpm, detach, and then refuel themsleves. So what's the problem with that?

You're talking crap.The only thing stopping electricity being produced on earth is motion. Motion is the key, hydro plants use water, gravity, and pressure to spin a turbine and produce electricity. The pressure produced by burning fuels produce gases are also used in this way. In space what goes up does not come down. Your rules do not not apply. If you spin something in *SPACE*. WAKE UP JACK IT WILL NOT STOP. Thus you get to spin the turbine depicted in the above example without needing to constantly use a force like on earth. You know I am right. Stop trying to stifle science.

Are you hearing things, no there just radio waves. That's perliminary physics, da. If you spin something in space, it spins forever unless something stops it. So if I put a simple generator in space, initially spin the magent at about 10million rps, it will spin a very long time. Copper is a conductor but is not attacted to magnets. Thus the copper will not stop the magnet spinning, more so if you use superconductor new superconductive wire. can you finish this for me?

Not so, science is still relatively new.

http://www.freewebs.com/gemco/

O.K but what should it be. 1) Should it be a language where you program new computer applications such as C++ using genetic code are the rule setter. So instead of compiling, linking and building a program writtem in C++, you instead, generate DNS fragments, join it to a carrier module and them introduce it to the host cell for amplification. or 2) Should it be a language where you can create new organisms based on typing AGCT which are latter put into classess. I think the latter. We could probably then put all the new organisms in an aquariem and create a screensaver

Stick and stones may break my bones but words can never harm me. On earth it takes constant force to move something. If you take a look at a hydro power station, water is used to spin a turbine. The water tide, gravity is also used as well as added pressurized pipes. When the water stops the turbine quickly comes to a halt. In space things are totally different. When you initially move something in space it does not slow down. But keeps moving. The only resistances you are talking about are the load on the circuit.

First of all you have never been to space. I had to say that. e.g you could re-spin it mechanically, if it slows down. say you're the generator is spinning at 10,000 rpm, over time due to resistances it may slow down, it so you then mechanically re-spin the gen back to 10,000rpm. I am thinking you would get much more energy out of the generator, some of that energy could then be used at given time used to keep the rpms up.

I think that's a matter of design.

check this article I posted, should help you. File Input/Output ckick here

I have an idea to create the Genetic Engineering Programming Language. In the hope it would help biologists understand microscopic organisms. The language could allow biologists to build organisms in a computing environment using the sohpisticated language. What are your ideas? & What does the Genetic Engineering Programming Language mean to you.

Great, congratulations. This will you time to review the subject and clarify things you may not have grasped. by the Geek from hell.