IsiacTorres

What are those fields supposed to be made up of, or what are they waves in?

It was brought to my attention that electromagnetic waves do not act as particles. If so, (and the same applies to atoms/quarks etc) the smaller and smaller the level of measurement you look, you will keep finding space bordered by mass. If that is true, what if the particles/waves we see aren't actually physical items, but waves or ripples in the environment.This would apply to the idea that light can travel through a vacuum; maybe it's not actually traveling through nothingness, but is a reaction of another dimension that is unnoticeable by the equipment we have so far.

A photon is made up of electro and magnetic waves, and with the idea that everything is always made up of something smaller, could we recreate this in a much larger scale? And if so could we possibly unlock the incredible velocity of light, or atleast some form of propulsion?

I would disagree on the part that you say "science isn't in the business of proving things right. It just proves that some things can't be right." Science is the idea that you should question everything and create new hypothesis from the observable universe. Though with that may come trying to prove things wrong, it is much too broad to assume it only has one purpose. I love your approach to the idea, instead of trying to shoot it down you stated that it does not clearly match the evidence we have.

This may seem really "deep", but if you think about it time and everything we know had to have a point when it didn't exist. If there was a point when existence and logic didn't exist, then there was a point when everything existed simply because nothing said it cant. But doesn't this leave us with a paradox? But everything can't just suddenly change into nothing again, because we have already experienced something. But this is philosophy.

When you think about it, if everything is always made up of some smaller unit of matter, then at the smallest level wouldn't ALL forces be Kinetic energy? Now it might not seem so, but to primitive civilizations fire and the power of movement were two completely different things. Now we know that Fire is really kinetic vibrations at the atomic level. You see were i am going?

As you probably know, inside of a nebula gas particles attract each other and start to clump up. The larger the clumps get the higher the gravitational pull of the whole, until eventually the pressure in the core is so great fusion starts to take place, lighting it up like a spherical candle. After the star has lived and expanded into a giant star it dies out and explodes or implodes, possibly making another nebula or forming a neutron star. Well i was thinking about this while coming up with a name for my film production (irrelevant), and i began to think about how the universe is still expanding. What if our universe does the same thing? It seems as though everything in our observable universe goes through cycles, so don't you think it would be logical that energy did the same? I apologize if my grammar is bad or my question is mixed up, my mind is currently fried for other reasons.