Correct me if I'm wrong, but the common conception of the reality of gravity is that all objects that have mass/density generate an attraction. Objects of higher density/mass will have more attraction than objects of smaller density/mass but every object of density/mass does exert attraction.
There are considered three other forces attributed to the cause of motion. The strong force (the reason for atomic particle motion), weak force (the reason for radiation) and electro-magnetism.
Gluons, Bosons and Photons are said to be the particles that carry the force that explain the strong,weak and electro-magnetic forces.
I understand there is a thought that it will most likely be discovered that gravity also has a particle that carries the force to explain how gravity works.
My question considering the reality of gravity is as follows: if we consider that particles carry a force that makes gravity function, must we not also ask ourselves how specifically does this force do what we give it credit for doing?
Is it possible that there is no reality to gravity? That the activity in the universe that we are attributing to gravity as it is presently defined, which is, and I will quote the start of this post "that all objects that have mass/density generate an attraction".
Should we be on the look out for another reason for why things move as they do without utilizing the theory of gravity? I understand that this is not the area for people to speculate on new theories. This is not what I am seeking. Rather I am hoping someone can give me an understanding as to what gravity is and how it works.
