Mitch Bass

I'm asking members of this society this question although its been almost a year since I last was active...i assure you...what i was getting at has been streamlined and revamped...I am goibg to stop this because i realize i am not following protocol so...

so a source tells me about Velocity x Vector x Volume as something to do with an explanaton for all activity from the macro to the micro...I'm hearing that this explanation allows for easily repicable working models and utilizes not gravity, nor any of the other three forces but yet can mimic all known activity ....comparing the quantum world and relativistic stop making sense as both are considered moving for the same reasons but with only apparent, but not actual, difference in terms of consequential activity. I tried incorporating the VxVxV into a post offering an explanation as to the "erratic " movement of a towel let go. i do not want to be accussed of hijacking the topic but i I doubt my contribution to that post allowed for a greater understanding. Really, all i am requesting, is if anyone knows about the potential legitimacy of the name of this post i started being an equation that is a central part to a cutting edge understanding of the universe or am I getting compeletly false intell?

Had i known people still cared about the first code i would have started with the reality that one person cracked the code. This being said the first clue to the code was not properly worded and was two contain the idea that the last two out of three words were a result of pressure...The first word and third word are considered by humans materials to be adorned, the second word "makes cars go"... All three considered amongst the highest valued items. So to continue where i left off so many months ago...G.O.D. is the code and now you have my clues to cracking the code worded as they were supposed to have neen worded. I apoligize painfully for messing up the way in which i worded the clues in the first place. As far as knowing puzzle folk ...i consider myself within this group although perhaps also a " renegade from the human race" i am so maybe i am an atypical puzzle enthusiast and perhaps i dont know puzzle folk as well as i would have guessed considering "solving puzzles" is essentially what I "do" for a "living". This being said, when i think about it, i whole heartedly agree with the responses to my saying to start with a fresh code. Phi for All thank you for reminding me that a true puzzle enthusiast would rather me clear up the broken clues than begin with a new code. Simple code inspired by you. P4A But if there are really puzzle enthusiasts let me perhaps throw out a few codes with the knowledge that i will be quick to respond to any "attempts" swiftly at least for the next three months five days and sixteen hours , more or less R.A.D./S.A.D. This is one code to be cracked First clue...incorporating R.A.D. and understanding S.A.D. are both almost always vital to any corporations potential sucesss. From pharmaceutical companies to toy manufactures to sellers of any and all things A code that might take months or maybe minutes to crack is: TTHCTWSTTOMT/OSOSOCWOCAK/AWTSIBHAWPHW First clue: TTHCTWS2TOMT/OSOSOCWOCAK/AWTSIBHAWPHW Another code : TDTHLATBOH Clue: ThDo2HeLiAtThBoOfHe

my educated guess is that the seeming duality can be explained by undestanding the objective reality of what light is

I know to the senior mentor who wrote about misunderstanding conclusions to double slit eXPERMENT. But this knowledge comes from only personal obsrvarions leading to what seems so insanely relative theories to Ll universal motion rheories

just now having watched a "physics documentary" called "the Universe" final episode of final season (on Netflix currently) called the microscopic universe. The widely reknown "double slit" experiment was discussed or as they called it "double hole" experiment. This documentary was made in 2007. Let me ask first...does the notion of the consquequnces of the experiment still produce the idea that a particle could exist in two places at once due to the "strange" "against common sense" "spooky" world of "quantum physics". Let me ask second...has all the technical understanding of why the experiment results are dependent upon whether or not the experiment was being observed?

i've been a way for awhile and now the gameshow is my main priorotity. Let me start with a fresh code. W.B.W. first clue B.R.B.

THE more intrigued you are the more chance I will invite you to help me wih production I give codes to participants if no one cracks the Code clues are given G.O.D. first clue all valueABLE and pressure

you say this matter has been dealt with. what was the conclusion why has the post before mine asking a question that you said hAS BEEN DEalt I stared this post in response to the post which is asking the question am I right r wrong does time have motion /\? \\

there is a rule when two objects of equal energy collide head to head to the two objects cancel each other

time is a means to measure matter in motion

interestingly enough in the Evolution of Consciousness, what you are indicating about parts of the brain being hardwired for all the possible sounds that languages contain (they "can"contain of hard wire limitations) is exactly the point of the idea the author talks about being true. While I am sure you are correct about the same areas of the brain being used for language, same area is where all the potential pathways exist at first of which most are shut down.

WHen you wrote "as time passes from t=0"....is this meaning the same thing as saying "as things occur from a point in the past to the future than well...regardless the simple answer to your question is that if a system does become more chaotic than it will be more difficult to predict. This being said let us examine how you phrased your question keeping in mind that I am not attempting a conflict based on semantics. You wrote "In chaos theory, as time passes from t=0, does a system become more chaotic, thus more difficult to predict?" Breaking this down we have to begin with In chaos theory, as time passes from t=0, does a system become more chaotic, thus more difficult to predict? If you are suggesting that chaos theory causes systems to become more chaotic then already a problem becomes evident. Many systems as time "passes from t=0" become less chaotic. The pathway towards user friendly computers is an example of how systems can go from greater to lesser chaos. Easier to operate, understand. Computers that were unreliable and often unpredictable evetually evolved to the point where a person can use a computer now without ever learning a computer language or even an instruction book. The essence of chaos theory constitutes the concept that greater amounts of variables generates a system that is not random but rather chaotic. So, my question to anyone reading this, should you choose to attempt to answer is: How is chaos differentiated from randomness?

I think the book is called the Evolution of Consciousness. I am hoping someone who has read this book or has come across similar knowledge that this book seems to indicate, can help me to either affirm or deny the rumors that have or have not been told as a result of such a large part of our brain being inactive. A movie just came out that centered on the possibility that if a person could have access to the full brain than that person might develop amazing abilities. From what I have read the opposite seems to be true. An infant has access to just about the full brain and as the baby matures parts of the brain are shut down to allow for learning. The best example I seem to remember is that of learning a language. An infant will begin its life making sounds like gurgling that span the types of sounds from all languages. At this point a portion of the baby's neural pathways begin to shutdown in the areas that would allow for the sounds not utilized by the child's native language to become inactive.The name of this phenomenon if I have it right is "hedging". From what I have come to understand but could be mistaken concerning, if the brain did not go through this hedging process, it would be like a city of streets with traffic lights that were all green all the time.

Perhaps the best place to examine for the best evidence of evolution is the same place that inspired darwin. The Galapagos islands ended up in a location far enough from any other land mass that land animals were isolated. darwin noticed the existence of ANIMALS THat were unlike that existed elsewhere because of the specialization of features these animals had which were essential for survival on one of the most remote places in all the world. I have heard that a developing human fetus goes through transformations that is inclusive of less complex forms of life. I seem to remember being told that at some point a developing fetus has gills for a short period. does this sound familiar to anyone else?