Nicholas Kang

Good, and this means a new step towards renewable energy source and the rise of the green industry.

This reminds me of how to clear the "overwhelming" number of space junks in space. Should we develop reuseable satelites and rockets?

Yes, not to forget about Strange too. Do tell Strange not to feel sad, I appreciate his point of view too. And thanks for your advice. stringjunky. And finally, we seemed to have hijacked this thread. Time to split this thread.

Thanks, xyzt. It is nice to meet you. (I should have said this when I first posted a topic regarding your post). And Thanks for your link. I would definitely enjoy it. Goodnight everyone, I am going to hit the sack now. It is 12:44 AM in Malaysia. Thanks xyzt and stringjunky.

Oh, I have heard it about it before and I will read it. Do you have the website? I will read it after learning calculus.

Nope, that would be in form 4 and form 5. I still have a few months to go. So, no problem if you recommend me now. Linear algebra, yes. Some simple ones. Calculus, definitely no.

I am Form 3, 15 years old. I study all 3 fields, Biology, Chemistry and Physics. And most interested in Physics. In Malaysia, we are back of time, so I hate Malaysian syllabus. I moved a step ahead by studying the 3 fields first before I am 16. In Malaysia, all science are combined into one textbook, Science from Form 1 to form 3 then when approaching Form 4, we are given choice to choose either science stream or linguistic stream. I will definitely opt for science stream. So, I prepare them well and I always have arguments with my teacher because I have studied Form 4 but they teach Form 3.

My real name is Kang Zheng Tien. English is my second Language. I love English and Science.

I WILL BE a real or fake scientist? Which part I haven`t done? Thanks.

You mean I will be a real scientist or a fake scientist? I hope my earlier post didn`t hurt you. What are Sagnac and MMX?

Edit: Add the word IF

Or maybe that is my problem. Statement understood

But you don`t get it. I seek for explanation, not (to me) sacrastic praising, I am very sad after seeing your praise.

So, that was my mistake. I will be a fake scientist and I won`t know why without an explanation. So, you are/might be/will be a real scientist and I will be a fake scientist, living on the edge of Science until one day I found a new theory and change the world, that was my dream but definitely seemed ridiculous to you because I am a fake scientist, so, fake dream.

what do you mean?

Never perfect knowledge, so this means we can`t reveal all of the secrets of Nature forever. So, we seek explanations, endless explanations and very unfair to those who passed away before knowing the emerging new theories, like those who study Classical Physics and were dead before Modern Physics emerge. We are living on Earth, so how abstraction works, in detail please. To me, there is no absolute stationary, so, experiments if accurate, must be in stationary standard, this means the experiment must not be on a moving object, and a space that is expanding.

First paragraph: So, we observe nature, we form a hypothesis that shows that we speculate nature, developing experiments to test nature and to show how they behave, observe nature after we test it, getting others to check nature again to make sure nature behaves like that all the time and so on. Second paragraph: When can we found a true finite statement because if we knew nature and its behaviour then one theory should last forever but not new observations take over them and if so this means we still don`t understand nature. Yes, you are right, if something goes wrong, then we should start over again but how many times? Every time? How often? Theories emerge and being replaced, is it fair to those who learnt Newtonian dynamics and passed away before learning Einstein`s Theory of Relativity? They know gravity is a force, but Einstein simply tells you it is just a curvature of spacetime geometry. So, endless explanation and being replaced over and over again, so when would it stop or it won`t stop, maybe? Nature hides the secret forever and you won`t ever know it? When you do experiment on Earth, you simply state that it is stationary because you and the lab isn`t moving, but Earth does. You use Maths to add in the earth rotation, but don`t forget that Solar Syatem (SS) is moving, and Milky Way and Local Cluster and space expansion too. The questions that elude and tantalize us and couldn`t be repeated on Earth, like the origin of the Universe and the end of the Universe.

Include the sentence before it and add the word YOU and finally read the Edit section.

Clean Air, Pure Water, Sunshine? Does it existYes, it would exist when humans are not destroying the Earth or simply humans do not exist on Earth.

How can we know this is how nature behaves? We don`t create nature. We know them by exploring them, something like nature archaeologist. But when these eternal questions can be solved is something interesting. We can toss equations that well describe experiments but what about the origin of universe and the end of the universe? You can simply say we are stationary while standing, but the Earth is moving. YOU Assume the Earth is not moving, the Solar System is revolving around the Milky Way. Assume that the Solar System isn`t moving, the Milky Way galaxy is heading towards Andromeda M31 at 110km/second. Assume that galaxies, clusters and superclusters aren`t moving, but then space is expanding, thus eternal question. Edit: I mean we simply say we are not moving when we stand on Earth but the Earth move. And you must take other factors into account, this includes The moving of solar system, Milky Way Galaxy, Local Cluster and the expansion of space itself.

They take up more processing powers?

I think there is a problem with my computer, I shall apologise because you are posting a link but not the one I saw on my screen just now. Thanks for sharing that link. I mean it is not a figurative meaning at all.

Please clarify your statement. I am a bit confused. You mean that Mathematics can take over old Maths, so new Maths will replace the current assumed Maths formula and simply makes faster-than light-travel possible?

Sorry, I really don`t get what you mean. I am not good at figuring figurative meanings.

What do you mean?