Nicholas Kang

Physics is restricted to Mathematics. Is it possible to go for faster-than-light travelling/moving? Or this is impossble because Maths again? I understand statement b) but still suspicious towards statement a)

What do you mean?

I am always eager to have a microscope in my house. Have you checked any leakage in the cup, or look up the respiration rate/breathing rate/metabolism rate of a mosquito? Maybe that can help you?

Ah?! Why we don`t need new Physics? I thought scientists will face problems when dealing with faster-than-light speed calculations in theoretical physics.

i am advised not to discuss about sex since young. Please, don`t ever change my mind. sex, is just a matter of future, when I am a man later not now. Addendum: let`s talk about religion and science, not using sex as an anology, please, science and religion, please. Thanks. Reference; Addendum writting style based on Sato`s style. Thanks, again, stop using sex as an anology in dicsussing science and religion. Thanks. Regards, Nicholas Kang Finally, you are coming, Essay. Welcome. and a good start with a fact-filled passage. I appreciate that, Thanks.

So, we need new physics. Who is going to develop them? Maybe I am interested in it? My ambition is to be a scientist.

Split the thread. No hijacking.

Thanks, I got it.

Ok, why it isn`t a valid reference frame?

The speed of light is constant and it is a very specific reference frame.

Aren`t they know that the trillion-dollar fossil fuel industry will one day shut down due to lack of resource. They just see the money in a short period of time? Aren`t sucessful businessmen good in anticipating the foreseeable future?

I mean I am suspicious about Janus`s post and her meaning. Not to mean you, dear Mr. Ophiolite. Nothing wrong with you, Mr.Ophiolite.

Thanks.

Oh, now I know why. Sorry to say, I enjoy reading his books. Have you read his book(s) before? List some examples please.

Your personal idea or others think of this also?

What do you mean?

I just posted until where I had known. Refer to Michio Kaku`s The Future of The Mind. Maybe I misunderstood his meanings. Or try Google first. I am sorry for not doing my homework well before posting this topic. I thought of learning something new about Caveman Principle, but instead, I learnt a moral lesson first. Thanks.

Thanks for your explanation. I am a bit suspicious.

They think of I am a sily teenager? Or they think that I shouldn`t exist in this world?

What about if most populations of the countr(y/ies) are living near mountain areas? They rely on tourism industry of agriculture industry to live and survive.

Crisis, to me, means critical. Of course, we need to seek for opportunities. So, looking towards green industries would be a good choice. Develop solar, tidal, wave, hydrielectric, wind, biomass and geothermal energy would be ok. So, we don`t need need lightning yet currently and probably the future too.

then, correct my conclusion. Do we have energy crisis now?

You are just attracting attention but not everyone will take you seriously. Emphasize can be done in various ways

Frankly, I don`t support anthropic principle. That is just a speculation of the unseens like assuming aliens would be the same as human. I learnt this principle from Michio Kaku`s book including The Future of the Mind and Hyperspace.

Then, topic ended. Conclusion: 1. Not need to worry about energy crisis now. 2. It is not economical to develop lightning as a source of energy. Thanks. Speculation is never a waste. It teaches you new things and clears out the impossibilities. Regards, Nicholas Kang