Nicholas Kang

You mean UP is derived from SWE?

Ok, I get what you mean. Quasiparticles are derived to explain phenomena-many-body problem. They are not particles but phenomena of simplifying complex solid particles motion.

I mean you don`t realize the importance of religion because that`s you-yourself.

I found a similar article on the web-a recent one to proof that this case is not an old one. What is lol? http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2672092/Was-Einstein-wrong-Controversial-theory-suggests-speed-light-SLOWER-thought.html I really learnt a lof of thing from your PDF good and it seemed like you have read a lot of online science PDFs

You need maths to solve physics questions.

Maybe I can send your copy to the newspaper company and show them that they were wrong and their report was misleading. Sorry for the grammatical errors. I have edited it. Edit: I mean the grammatical errors in the post #22 i.e. this post. I am not a native English speaker. I don`t understand why this post can be voted down. Is it wrong for a person to write to the newspaper company and just to inform them that their articles were misleading? I can choose not to but can I simply ignore it and let the people in my country continue being misled by the news? No. Impossible. I must tell to prevent those outside the scientific community from continuous failure to learn and understand true Science.

For the first time I knew that quantum mechanics can have application on birds. http://guardianlv.com/2014/06/birds-that-use-quantum-mechanics-to-migrate/

What is the magnitude of your work? Very interesting in it/halfway to it/just know and understand a little stuff is enough? Many factors cause someone to change religions though. Some may be influenced by parents, friends and other possible sources. Some may learn by themselves Some may change due to relationships and sacrifices. Slight and brief understanding about other religions is enough. In my opinion, this is not converting religion. This is respecting others` religion.

I think it should be air particles, heat around the air, and microorganisms. Please tell me what is your experiment/homework. Are there any variables?

So, the newspaper was wrong. Thanks. Do you have articles showing that this particular Supernova explosion measurement was wrong instead of showing me related news?

Personally I don`t like looking at the screen for hours long just to read one book. I opt for traditional paperback and hardback books. I like the taste of holding a book on my hand and that is even good if it was a science book!

Einstein Relatively Simple by Ira Mark Egdall The Future of the Mind by Michio Kaku Hyperspace by Michio Kaku

Michio Kaku`s The Future of The Mind A good book relating consciousness and the world.

Is virtual particles also known as quasiparticles and dropletron is one of the examples? @Infinityloop I think Michio Kaku`s book Hyperspace would also explain your answer about string theory. I think you should read it. There is even superstring theory and its history in his book, but that was an old book around 20 years ago and yet still worth to read.

OK. So, there is no need of using lightning as a mean of electricity source. Am I right? Just develop green energy industry would be better than developing ways to generate electricity through lightning.

Just read the book and your doubts are solved. But I shall remind you that most examples given are on experiment basis and not widely used, yet. So, it is still a far cry to control matter through consciousness.

Your body reacts 300 milliseconds earlier than your brain. How do you relate consciousness with time?

If I am not mistaken, there was a new hypothesis made by a university in the USA regarding the new calculation about the speed of light. This hypothesis explains why the light from SN 1987 A delays for 4.7 hours upon arriving on Earth. The neutrino should come first in 3 hours time then followed by light beam. But the light beam took 7.7 hours upon reaching Earth. So, maybe Einstein was wrong.

What do you mean by be a student of comparative religion for a few months? Are you atheism? I don`t think of religion as being too important. I am just a student, not a professor in religion. So, why continue talking about it? I am just asking is it possible to unite religion and science. If they are both incompatible. Then simply tell me it is incompatible and that`s all. What do you mean by religion is entirely speculation? I do like some speculations but not all the time and in every contexts. Religion, as I would say, is nothing more than believe. You believe it, it exists. You don`t believe it, that`s your problem. But there is one thing you should always remember, You have a religion. Always have. Must have. And that is you.

Yes, I think so. Schrodinger`s Wave Equation must obey Heisenberg`s Uncertainty Principle.

To avoid obstacles, you must first know that there is obstacles. You observe obstacles, that`s why you avoid it. And when you observe obstacles. You will definitely know what it is. If it is a huge stone, maybe several meters across, you have to flip your tires more to avoid it. If it is just a small stone, maybe 30-70 cm across, you just have to flip your tires less to avoid it. If it is very tiny, simply ignore it and still no harm to your car.

My point: Science is objective, Religion is subjective. Science is constant. Einstein`s Theory is universal. Christian, Islam, Buddhism, Taoism, Sikh and Hinduism are relative and varies among people. Science explains. Religion tells. Science shows. Religion speculates. I do reject religion when I first fall in love with Science but soon I found out that I was wrong. Minor religion believe is a must for everyone and this is basic philosophy. I opt for Science but I couldn`t give up religion. I tried to quit religion before. I failed.

Thanks again.

So, time has to be calculated for but not to be defined? JUst calculate time but no argument over what is time?

Read Michio Kaku`s book-The Future of The Mind