Nicholas Kang

Evidences?

I just use stupid as an example. I won`t do that. I won`t that. It is just an example that shooked up my mind since I want to mention something negative as an example. There are other examples too, but I just talk about stupid. Dear Mr. Phi for All, You know I am just a student. Of course I don`t have much free time to look at the SFN rules and sorry to say that/do that. Could you tell me I had violated which law of the SFN? I am willing to hear. Thanks. Ok, I agree with you, Arete. I am too rush. So, I will take some time and let`s see how, is that ok? You are right, it is social ethics. But, what about those who don`t follow? What about those who are immature? Why I disapprove one`s post? Of course people would want to know why. So, we should explain to people and of course explaning can be his/her topic is/was wrong or inaccurate scientific theory or inappropriate useage of words. People would learn from us. That is good. Of course discussion of feelings must be minimized.

You know, I don`t mean to bomb my own school. That is just my own expression. I mean angry, very angry but not exceeding the limit, how can you say that I want.would bomb my own school. For your information, my current school is where I started to expose to Science, and is the reason why I am here, in the SFN. I really feel sad and upset and full of dissapointment with your reply. This might be just a case in which misunderstanding of words occurs. Maybe you don`t understand what I mean or I should reword my English. By the way, your reply is really upsetting. Shame on me? That is fine, as long as that I am still I. I won`t change because I know I won`t bomb my own school, no matter how angry I am.

Ok, sorry.

How can you be so sure that using words as a means of approval and disapproval will, by definition, not be on the topic under discussion? It shouldn`t be wrong to use words to show your disapproval and if there is reasonable reason. For example, if I say you are stupid. And instead of voting me-1, you can reply me why you say I am stupid. Do you have evidences? If yes, then you should think of what`s wrong with you. If no, simply report the moderator/administrator. Then, I will disappear from you and this forum. Of course, saying you are stupid may make you angry, so I am wrong at first, then you can simply report me to the moderator. And this prove that from words, you can simply/easily know my character and terminate me to prevent further trouble. Then you should think of it now.

Dear ajb, I don`t understand why you quote my reply and answer something that is not related to my reply but Deepak Kapur`s?

So, invalid speculation? Useless speculation?

Yes, I strongly agree. Totally no objections. Anyway, the school should understand that fixing mechanical correction tapes are not easy jobs. And no more further arguments. So, just have to follow school rules. I mean I just have to admit the fact that I should think of the school not only myself. But, you know maybe other students also face this problem but they just don`t want to say aloud.

You didn`t answer my question, ajb. I did ask you what is your opinion about limiting negative posters membership period. So, until certain limits, their membership will be terminated then the argument ends.

Thanks, ajb. Quantum fluctuation of space? I like it, a new vision of space. Just like my earlier space speculation hypothesis. I am looking forward to this thread.

So, you mean I should think of others as well? Ok, good advice and I will hear it. New lesson today. But, you know I am really "feel like bombing the school" when everytime I found out my mechanical correction tape just get stuck and I always have to fix it. Using mechanical objects is a thousand times troublesome compared to chemical correction liquid. Anyway, teachers in my school are allowed to use correction liquid.

Sorry I suspect it wrongly. Actually, I did read before Einstein`s book about Lorentz Transform and something very/totally similiar to your formula. What is the difference between factor and the transform?

You mean Lorentz Transform, I got it. Thanks.

Ok, I loss again. So, no argument. Wait a minute, you mean these people are annoying in the forum? Since they just do those jobs that are as unnecessary as what you have mentioned, then why don`t just set a limit for them. For example, maximum -5 points. If more than -5, then their membership will be automatically being disqualified. Then, the job is done. So, no worries of cases like you have mentioned above, and we are all happy. I am still young. So, instead of asking nonsenses, I will opt for learning. I did learn something new through this forum, especially Science(Physics) and English as well. Famous mentors including you ajb, Mordred, Sato, Phi for All, Ophiolite, Endy0816, Delta1212 and Bignose. You are all my mentors and in the future I welcome all of you to continue to be my mentor and I wish to learn more from all of you.

Actually, I haven`t raise this problem in the school yet, so the possibility of getting not welcomed is low, anyway. But no matter what replies have been made, it is still unfair. That is life? Life is unfair, mostly unfair. Often the way rules work? Then rules would be unfair and then why follow rules if so. Anyway, don`t have to worry if I won`t follow rules. I will follow until a stage where I win(this argument).

Mass-shell condition? 3-momentum? What are they? p has something to do with momenergy?

I mean we can use words to disapprove or approve or agree with somone`s idea. The words can show that you are not angry/rude.dislike the poster when you reply him/her. So, the poster might not feel upset and willing to accept your comment and the truth. If you use a red-1 sign, somehow the poster feels sad /upset and loss confidences in her life/science carrier and more serious one can lead to suicide, who knows? We shouldn`t just look things from one perspective, but we should look through the whole situation. Dear Mr. Phi for All, we want to abolish reputation system because other ways are better than the current reputation system. Yes, it is an issue where I am not satisfy with this forum`s current reputation system. The data available is more than enough. My 2 weeks experience tells me to fight for those posters` who have their post(s) beeing voted down. I am not satisfy, so, I won`t just sit in front of this computer and just replying/posting new topics. I want changes to be made, so everyone is happy. (Maybe Mr. Phi For All won`t happy ) Dear Mr. Endy0816, You mean this forum is not democratic at all? Ok, yeah, you are right because only administrators and moderators have the right to control the post contents and the status of posters. My right stops when I had finished posting and the resident experts right rises when they comment over your post. Both rights stops when moderators and administrators control/take action of your post. So, finally, it seems that only moderators and administrators right will always rise and never fall. (They do fall after controlling one`s post but soon another will take over)

So, a universe with no begining and no end is the best option? Since if A causes Big Bang, then you may ask what causes A? Then if B causes Big Bang, you may continue to ask what causes B and so on, till infinity.

Energy=mass times speed of light in vacuum squared, i.e. E=mc2 Energy and mass are conserved by Einstein`s formula.

I don`t mean school banning correction fluid is violating international human right law. It seems like you had misunderstood my meaning. I just take the UN H.R.law as an example. Banning correction liquid has nothing to do with human right, anyway. I just mean it is unfair but it doesn`t violate human right. People have the right to band you form using correction liquid but you also have right to simply abandon his/her rules. Now, I am talking about the school rules make no sense and us unfair to most of us(the good and well-behaved students)

Unanswered question means not a stable theory or not yet perfect.

In conclusion, Humour have a place on SFN in every corner of your screen, you can decide whether humour or not, it is up to you. Neither anyone will force you to be humour but if you take it, don`t misuse it or you will irritate others.

How do you know/can you say this forum is not democratic? We speak at least through words but I dislike reputations. This forum is democratic in the sense that you are allowed to speak through words/express your opinions and together with reputations but my suggestion is to shut down the reputation system and continue with replying system because no problem with democratic but emotions. We should take others` emotion into account too.

I think I should be able to speculate my own future. Yes, I maybe will have children in the future but I am not sure maybe my children would think in the same way with what I think now during his/her age. I will be sympathy of my teachers? No, I don`t think so. You see, I am talking about fundamental law`s prinsip. School rules are law too, just with a limitation on how far/wide the law can be implemented. So, the prinsip of law shouldn`t change no despite where/how wide the range is, as long as it is part of law or it is law. I mean why law in school doesn`t behave in the same manner with laws involving nation issues or national law, and even international laws like the UN Human Right Declare. The Declare state that you must not simply abondon human right. Yes, in this context, I admit that the declare did stop you form bullying people before taking actions but this case is too serious and involve too many people, unlike the school rules which just involve school students. And most importantly the prinsip behind them. School laws 1. Obvious meaning: Warn student not to do wrong behaviors 2. Non-obvious meaning: If someone is violating the law, then punishment will be given Laws-Nationwide, Worldwide 1. Obvious meaning: Punish someone who is wrong. 2. Non-obvious meaning: Warn someone not to repeat mistake UN Human Right`s Declare 1. Obvious meaning: Tells you human right and tells you you must obey it. 2. Non-obvious meaning: If violated, then you will be punished by UN law. It seems that the UN Human Right`s Declare is the same as the school rules but this declare covers a wide range of people, form adults, women, children, slaves, and leaders around the world, there is mix culture and mix geopolitics issues. Nevermind, I can still accept that. So, no arguement on that issue. The most important part is the prohibited items, especially tissues and correction liquid. I don`t agree with this fact. You see, it is very very unfair for most of us to not be allowed to use correction liquids and tissue, especially for the those who need them, like me, (I had bronchitis). I did apply for lettter and is approved but I am still not satisfy with the school administration and feel like unfair for my friends. They don`t have bronchitis but they need it when they have wounds/bleeding, wasing hands, hygienic purposes and wipe their face or parts of body during sweating under the hot sun. Handkerchief comes close in this case but it is not hygienic to use one handkerchief for multi-purpose, like sneeze and wipe blood with the same handkerchief but a pack of tissues is more suitable. Correction liquid? It is unfair to most of us that won`t damage the tables or chairs. I/We have brains, there is no benefits to get form spoiling chairs and tables/vandalism. So, why? I am not crazy and naughty. Why sacrifice the majority while minority are only responsible for that case. And why don`t just do some counselling activities, maybe that could help out and this law would not be implemented.?

How do you know my speculation is unlikelt to happen, books like Micio Kaku`s The Future of The Mind did speculate this and that book provides a lot of evidences, and including scientific prooves, so how is it unlikely to happen in this context?