Nicholas Kang

One of the things one must learn in life is how to deal with criticism. Good philosophy statement. I like that. Since most of you had agree and moderators had come up to speak, I don`t think we shall continue, frankly speaking. Yet, I feel like not very suitable for reputation to be used and implemented in forum, maybe there are more pros than cons, I agree with that fact, but something uncomfortable is still in my mind, I don`t think we like down votes, why not just come up with an up vote-based reputation system, maybe that sounds better than the current reputation system? Are you sure that there is no any other alternatives but only (the current)reputation system?

Ok, thanks. Dear Cap'n Refsmmat, You say you have godlike powers? May I ask you how many Watts? (I am just joking)

Mr.Ophiolite, you see, I am trying my best not to misunderstand your words. I try not to let you down. So, this time, no sorry, no sorry. I won`t apologize, and I think you should be satisfy, shouldn`t you? Anyway, thanks for your comment. I will try it, but it is not every time I have the opportunity to see my principal.

It shouldn`t be wrong to speculate future, should it? I am just thinking of the future, maybe these technologies can become true and widely used? Who knows?

Ok, done. End this topic. No more replies. Dear Mr. Phi for All, Good, great, well. I like your post. Dear Arete, Good comment on pros and cons but I think there should be more. By the way, you have try your best. Thanks. So, I think let`s just continue with reputation system.

Yes, since CSF has a lot of similarities with blood.

Quicklime is cheap and easily available? Do you think your idea is economical?

It is great to see you, imatfaal. Thanks for your answer. But how can you control a vast amount of threads with a few moderators?

Ok, but how can you control those who are not serious and take reputation as a joke and simply hit the up/down button? Ignore them? Ask help from the moderator team?

My book is Michio Kaku`s book-The Future of The Mind. Actually, I mean and I am talking about the future.

Ok, even if CSF don`t flow through your heart, why CSF cannot be blood?

We follow laws all over the world. I am a secondary school student. In my school, the discipline unit listed a few prohibited items that should not be brought to school. Students should follow them. In the true world, we have international laws and protocols. Laws have their functions. I classify them into clear/obvious and non-obvious. It is very obvious that the international laws and protocols have a obvious meaning of punishing those who are wrong. The non-obvious meaning is teaching us lessons and warning us not to repeat mistakes. However, the school laws are the opposite. For example, prohibited items are mostly dangerous items like knife, guns, weapons and so on. But, is it fair if I say liquid correction fluid and tissues are prohibited items? I did ask my principal, he told me the following reasons. Correction fluid: It may be used by students that opt for vandalism and use that to draw tables and spoil chairs. Tissues: It might be used by students that use them and throw it into the sink in the Science Lab and thus clogging the sink. How unfair it is. You must understand that not all school students do vandalism and misuse tissues. Law punish people after they did something wrong. But prohibited items like those that I have mentioned above shouldn`t be prohibited items. Prohibited items are under strict school law control. Law in school, on the other way, obviously wants to teach you lesson and not repeat and only if you do it then you will be punished, the opposite of international, national laws and protocols. This way of punishment brings to me a lot of disadvantages. What does law means? Fair? Unfair?

Too much of them and lack of moderators?

What about if there are too many of them?

There is always pros and cons in every subject and matter. If you say the pros, what about the cons? You think there are more pros than cons? Can you list all the pros and cons?

I have to violate Mr.Ophiolite`s rule. Sorry. It is my fault. Actually, I didn`t look throughout his statement carefully. I had edited my post.

Knowledge is infinite? It is just an illusion. In the future, when one day, problems related to the origin and end of the universe are being solved, then knowledge would be finite because everything will just revolved around the universe and not beyond it, unless there is multiverse.

Mr. StringJunky, your pseudonym is very special. It is nice to meet you. We do need some humour. As long as it is not irritating, that would be fine. What about if someone is always humour and can`t control himself/herself?

Not bad. Good idea. So, you think reputation function should be removed or continued?

And almost every time Science do experiments on what religion tells us, Science prove them fail and/or do not exist.

I am young and there is a lot of thing to learn. I agree with this fact.

Ok, ok, no objections. At least in the forum no one will see how you feel after being hurt by someone else, we should think of the bright side. Every hurt has its meaning, but do remember not to use foul words.

You can be humour but it depends on the context. It depends on the surrounding situation. Therefore, you must be wise enough to think of when should I be humour and when it is not suitable.

The quality of post is based on the moderators and administrators and resident experts` selections. So, I think, if given a chance of tolerance, I will urge the moderators, administrators and resident experts to be the only group that can have the choice to vote, not simply give chances to culprits and those who tend to avenge others` comment, suggestion and explanation.

Science influence greater than human feelings? Because Science, you can can simply ignore how someone feels? You are right, this is a science forum. It is Science that matters but not excluding feelings. It doesn`t mean you can simply say anything without taking others reaction into account. This is unfair to them, isn`t it?