DeathShallWait

I guess he is talking about music or other type of media. There is iTunes software to move such files from Pc to iPhone, you can use third party softwares which can be risky or maleware.

If that happened to you after you killed someone or in that case my father , people would consider it as a punishment to you by nature or the god or whatever the force beyond us and it would still give me some degree of satisfaction. But in any case justice is not served by death of a person. It only stops them or stops others from doing the same crime.

Killing someone because they killed someone isn't the right justice. Because if you killed my father, your death is a mere satisfaction to me, it doesn't serve the right justice to me. Because regardless of your death my life is going to be the same, the feeling of missing my father or anyone in particular going to be the same. Death sentence is just a punishment in my opinion. If death was the punishment for a crime, people would refrain from doing that crime is that all. So if you were killed, or die by an accident it simply means you have received the punishment.

I guess he wants to know about "how" he can achieve time travel, by what means. At least that’s how I understood. If that was the question you want to travel in the future or to the past? www.bibliotecapleyades.net/ciencia/time_travel/esp_ciencia_timetravel25.htm http://science.howstuffworks.com/science-vs-myth/everyday-myths/time-travel.htm Read those stuffs. There are various ways to achieve time travel (all imaginary or in theoretically of course). Wormholes, black holes, cosmic strings are the things you need to know about. If you would develope a machine for time travel, it should travel faster than light because the theory goes like this. If you could travel faster than light, time slows down. Wormholes and blackholes allows instance travels. Read more on the website and create some ideas. If you have more doubts, people here will be glad to help you out.

This is the first time I come across the term "Binding energy" so I did some reading as I was interested. So I wouldn't know if this is right or wrong, you are very welcome to criticize as it gives me a better idea. The order you did is correct, but you shouldn't do it by electronegativity (or I do no clearly). The binding energy is calculated by atomic mass. http://www.chem.purdue.edu/gchelp/howtosolveit/Nuclear/nuclear_binding_energy.htm#Energyequivalent

I wouldn't say the mouse doesn't have the mental capacity it’s more like it doesn't think or should I say the way we humans think. Human brain is still a mystery and no one knows the potential of it. It’s like comparing similar ages of people and saying the human race just do not have the potential judging with the least intelligent of the compared people. Come on we have come far from a stone wheel to this modern era. Brain size did not change but the way we see things have changed in a large scale. So I am very positive humans have the potential for all the mysteries.

Its not about being in kept in the seat, its about the air resistance at higher speed. When you travel at higher speeds in open space, the air molecules at higher velocity impacts with your body. The higher the speed, the higher the resistance. At 300 Mph, your skin could be ripped off or atleast face some minor damage. To reduce the friction however you could use the aerodynamic shapes, like the car manufacturers use to reduce air resistance. If the area is higher the air molecules reacting with the surface is higher too, so usually narrowed shapes reduces air resistance.

I failed in Engineering Thermodynamics thrice in a row. So i don't clearly get this question, this is either too simple or too complicated. But i guess the solution would be Heat gained by ice = Heat lost by water. So at some point the mixture will reach equilibrium ( unless you mean something like ice being solid and still absorbing heat which isn't even possible as far as i know). The heat gained from converting ice from about -1 C or 30 F to Ice at 0C. Then converting Ice at 0 C to water at 0 C which is latent heat of ice. Then upto the equilibrium state. So the total heat gained by the ice is calculated and when it is equated with the heat lost by the hot water i guess the equilibrium state will be achieved? Heat lost by the ice can be calculated when it's mass is multiplied with the specific heat of ice which is 2000 J/(kg °C). And the latent heat of ice is 3 x 105 J/kg which can be used to calculate energy gained from 0 C to 0 C water by multiplying the mass of ice with latent heat of ice. Then the gained by 0C water to the equilibrium state. So something like (Mass of ice * specific heat of ice* temp difference which is -1 c to 0 c) +( Mass of ice * latent heat of ice) + (Mass of water* specific heat of water * temp difference which is Te Equilibrium temperature - 0 C) = (Mass of water * specific heat of water * temp difference which is about 15C - Te) Like i said i failed in Thermodynamics thrice, not kidding. So correct me if i am wrong.

I don't know if that is true because wiki says 1 kg is enough for such an amount of energy. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antimatter#Fuel And creating 5kg of antimatter is like..You don't even want to calculate the costs involving in.