Hi, yet at school I was thinking about several questions which so far have not found a satisfactory answer. Probably not once one has it erected. Perhaps here is a good opportunity to clarify these issues?
1. Centre of the Universe:
We observe far objects rushing away from us in any direction we do the observations what suggests, the move away from each other and consequently from some alleged center i.e. area or point the matter was concentrated earlier. On the other hand, the further the objects we observe the closer to the beginning of the Universe we are. The most distant observations are dated back 14 billion years, which is relatively close (100 million years as ) to the hypothetical Big Bang as I remember. The paradox is that our observation in any direction - especially in the opposite ones - brings us to the same starting point from which on the other hand objects are moving away. All this points on the edge of the observable Universe are the same starting point?
2. The accelerated expansion of the Universe :
Observations indicate that the further the objects are observed the bigger speed they move with away. However, this also means that the sooner after the beginning of Universe was the speed was higher and the later, the speed becomes lower. This observation suggests the matter slows down and not accelerates as it is said, doesn`t it?
3. Age of the Universe and our position:
We are observing most distant objects from about 14 trillion years of light what also is estimated at a little less than the age of the Universe. The speed of light is the largest and - as assumeed - impassable. However, in order to observe the most distant objects spaced 14 trillion years of, the first we (i.e. the matter we are built of) had to depart from them. How could the matter we are built of be able to travel the distance light travels in 14 trillion years, which is almost the assumed age of the universe since the speed of matter can only be a little fraction of the speed of light?
