TJ McCaustland

BTW if this ever gets off the ground and turns into a theory I will credit all of you because you help to formulate the theory by pointing out stuff. So thanks. And since current Quantum mechanics is a little.... sparse to say. I do simply assume certain things. That's why this in speculation and not quantum physics. This is where every theory should start, and eventually graduate to quantum mechanics when its ready. BTW if you think this is bad check out the McCaustland theory, my biggest mistake. That thing was a result of a late night with too much root beer, and probably too many videogame hours, which caused my brain to spasm out like a fish on land.... Well this speculation should graduate to quantum mechanics eventually, not every theory. Speculation Not theory

Well thanks for taking the time to read my wild hypothesis, and please continue to poke holes in it, it's required for each hypothesis to grow into a theory. Just to make a point, with all of this taken into consideration I would be applying very special circumstances to many of these points.

Hello, I would like to apologize to everyone who read the "McCaustland Theory" it was poorly explained, and very unorganized. This is my second attempt to explain my own personal hypothesis on the universe. First of all I do believe that black holes are actually how the universe first began, this is due to the phenomena known as hawking radiation. This explains why singularities less than a nanometer across dissipate (Correct on measurement if necessary). Now this I believe is due to another still highly hypothetical phenomena I like to call ultra-high velocity ejection. In the hypothesis of ultra-high velocity ejection I believe that when matter reaches the singularity inside the black hole it is ejected at a velocity many times the speed of light. This explains hawking radiation, and the big bang. Now it is widely believed that dark matter pushes matter away from matter, and is the reason why the galaxies are speeding away from us rapidly. I personally believe that dark energy dissipates, and when all dark energy dissipates we get another big bang, the reason why? well as I explained earlier hawking radiation causes tiny black holes to dissipate, and therefore I conclude that a similar thing happens with extremely large ones. Now think back to the dark energy speculation, gravity would take over right? well all that matter would come to form a gigantic black hole with nothing stopping gravity, and the hawking radiation from that, not to mention the ultra-high-velocity ejection hypothesis would cause it to explode after receding to become incredibly small mass. a supernova on ultra steroids basically this would also theoretically create more dark energy. If you would bear with me, this also explains revelation, how the world is recreated. Please, do not for any reason jump onto the anti-Religion bandwagon, I understand, and respect that we all have our own beliefs, please do the same. TJ McCaustland P.S. Think of light like a barrier, once it's hit it gets pushed backwards, not simply a speed limit to be obeyed.

Crap didn't mean to post that. Ah, that makes sense, but after the accretion disk dissipates there are still residual particals being emitted. Not saying you're not right on the accretion disk it's just the residual. Also on the equation it has use in this case because I am thinking of black holes in a way that has never been thought of before, or at least not to my knowledge

this is not only not right, it is not even wrong. such is quantum physics. Actually that equation does have use in calculating this instance because this is thinking of a black hole in a way that has never been done before, or at least not to my knowledge. And fiveworlds, that video does support evidence of my hypothesis, because if not even light can escape a black hole then these particle are travelling faster than light. *particles Because gravity remains the same under any circumstance so long as there is the same amount of mass. Because Black holes contradict all laws of physics, and can break them.

Please correct me if this is non-cohesive with special relativity and quantum mechanics. Alright any atom out of the periodic table, this is supposed to be a *Hypothesis with a wide view that accounts for all possible circumstances. But I will admit that you do have me on Theory. Very well (A)V=∞ UD=EEDC (Atom's velocity is infinite due to nearly infinite gravity *Meant to put that is post* Universal drag equals Energy times Energy density times the universal constant.)

Yes, I know that tachyons are INDEED theoretical but there is strong evidence of their existence, but I would also like to make the point that if a particle has no mass, it has no drag allowing it to achieve theoretically infinite velocity. hence the word THEORY. BTW unless you want an my theory in mathematical this is not word salad, it is theory in word.

Wtheck man? even though in quantum physics that could be true and false it is the most random video ever. *also infinite velocity is technically possible so long as the particle has a tiny mass, or none at all. Hence Tachyons.

Hello I am TJ McCaustland, now I obviously do not hold a PHD in Quantum physics, but I would like to propose a new theory that I have. This theory is that atoms when they enter the singularity of a black hole are given a technically infinite velocity due to the nearly infinte density and nearly gravity of a black hole, and all energy (Except kinetic of course) is removed from the atoms, which causes everything except the binding atomic energy (which is tiny) to be lost. Therefore allowing these particles to take on an amplified form of a tachyon effect, all except losing the kinetic energy over time because of the atomic binding energy. Now the interesting thing is you would not be able to see, nor detect such a phenomenon because the particles would be travelling faster than photons, and therefore would be invisible to detection through a tiny light emission. Now because the particles have no energy (except of course binding energy) there would be no energy emission whatsoever from the particles. Now If I am correct (Which I may not be on the lightspeed part) this is cohesive with the laws of physics, and special relativity (Correct me if I am not, Thanks ). Equation (A)V=∞ UD=EEDC (Atom's velocity is infinite) (Universal drag equals Energy times energy density times the universal constant)